bluecheesemon

Non-partisan advocate for protecting democracy, fighting climate change, promoting diversity & gun control for the good of us all now & for future generations.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@BarbMcQuade @CapehartJ @MSNOWNews Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@CNNPolitics Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@ABC Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@RepGwenMoore Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@GMA Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@TheDemCoalition Yes, SCOTUS justices should be impeached! They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@mjfree Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@nytimes Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@MeidasTouch Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@MichaelSteele Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@WalshFreedom @MichaelSteele Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@SenSchumer Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@NormOrnstein Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@chkbal @gtconway3d Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@RepRobertGarcia Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@SeanCasten Can SCOTUS justices be impeached? They are clearly biased in favor of the current POTUS, and spend most of their time on so many cases involving POTUS, including trivial & frivolous ones.

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

@BarbMcQuade Does SCOTUS do anything anymore besides cases involving POTUS? What % is on POTUS related cases?

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

CREEPY & THE CREEP!

[Ari K @arikuschnir]

AS THE WORLD BURNS (EXTENDED EDITION)

[bluecheesemon @bluecheesemon]

The end?

[George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸 @gtconway3d]

This is absolutely the last stop in the road in the case in which @realDonaldTrump had to pay @ejeancarroll $5,000,000 plus interest on a unanimous jury verdict for what the esteemed trial judge explained was, in common parlance, rape, and for defaming E. Jean by accusing her of lying about the rape.

Trump’s Supreme Court petition in the remaining case (involving a second $83.3 million verdict) contests the non-application of presidential and statutory official immunity. The resolution of those issues cannot in any way affect the now-permanent factual determinations underlying liability in the $5 million case.

In other words, Trump will never, ever be able to undo or challenge the fact that he is now, and forever more, an adjudicated rapist.

[George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸 @gtconway3d]

This is absolutely the last stop in the road in the case in which @realDonaldTrump had to pay @ejeancarroll $5,000,000 plus interest on a unanimous jury verdict for what the esteemed trial judge explained was, in common parlance, rape, and for defaming E. Jean by accusing her of lying about the rape.

Trump’s Supreme Court petition in the remaining case (involving a second $83.3 million verdict) contests the non-application of presidential and statutory official immunity. The resolution of those issues cannot in any way affect the now-permanent factual determinations underlying liability in the $5 million case.

In other words, Trump will never, ever be able to undo or challenge the fact that he is now, and forever more, an adjudicated rapist.