Bobby

[Major Richard Sharpe @takeitbackUK]

In Lahore the segregation has gotten to the point where they make women and men queue on different sides of the supermarket.

Only kidding this is Romford, Essex.

[Mel Gibson @MelGibson_04]

Women and girls are the first victims of Islam ☪️ 👿 🧕 🕌

Women and girls deserve freedom, dignity, and protection. No faith or culture should be used to justify oppression, abuse, or the denial of basic human rights. Stand for truth. Stand for the innocent.” ✝️

[Bobby @Bobby_elfhire]

@HeadWarriorTWM Oh dear

[Mel Gibson⭐ @MelGibsonxvyv]

If this doesn’t wake you up
You’re dead inside 👀

[Bobby @Bobby_elfhire]

Ex-NHS gender clinic leader: 'Pseudo-medicine' - castrating people without evidence or follow-up. @NHS @rcgp @RCSnews

[Nick Wallis @nickwallis]

First interview with a clinician who worked as a team leader in an NHS gender clinic:

"It's pseudo-medicine... the NHS is castrating people as a treatment option... the whole thing is wrong."

https://t.co/PaJVcCVuTv

[Nick Wallis @nickwallis]

First interview with a clinician who worked as a team leader in an NHS gender clinic:

"It's pseudo-medicine... the NHS is castrating people as a treatment option... the whole thing is wrong."

https://t.co/PaJVcCVuTv

[Jennifer Thetford-Kay @JenKteach]

*LAST DAY* DfE Shaping the future of early years teaching... The Early Years QTS consultation closes tonight at 23:59.

If you work in early years, teach, have young children, or simply care what 0–5s are taught, this is the moment to speak.
Raising early years teachers to Qualified Teacher Status is welcome. Status without substance is not.
What sits inside the new professional knowledge base will shape training, practice and safeguarding for years.
▶️What will “evidence-based” and “age-appropriate” actually mean?
▶️How firmly will it be rooted in child development, SEND, careful observation and developmental science rather than contested claims?

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

The opposite of multiculturalism

[Andrew Doyle @andrewdoyle_com]

Andy Burnham announces a new “National Centre for Information Defence”.

Yet another initiative that sounds as though it came straight out of Orwell…

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

Ofcom, the media regulator, has been accused of covering up data showing that GB News is more trusted by its viewers than the BBC.

Ofcom’s latest news consumption survey found that GB News viewers rated the channel more highly for trustworthiness than viewers of the BBC, Sky News, ITV and Channel 4 rated those broadcasters.

GB News was also ranked by its viewers above every other UK-based broadcaster for the range of views on offer, and tied with Sky News for first place on impartiality.

In previous years, Ofcom published these figures alongside a press release summarising the findings. This year, however, the figures were omitted from the survey published last week and only released online after a request from GB News.

This raises serious questions for Ofcom. Did it deliberately seek to suppress the true scale of GB News’s popularity among its viewers?

Conveniently, Ofcom has blamed the omission on “an administrative error”.

This is a damning story for the Government, coming at the same time as Lisa Nandy has drawn up proposals that would force social media platforms to prioritise “trustworthy” news sources approved by the Government — such as publicly funded broadcasters like the BBC — while demoting more critical outlets such as GB News.

How can the Government continue to claim that the BBC, ITV and Channel 4 are “trustworthy”, while excluding GB News when the evidence is so clear?

Read more below in @Telegraph 👇

[Bobby @Bobby_elfhire]

@IfindRetards 😬FFS

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

The minister doth protest too much, @wesstreeting.

It is clear that this new quango will be used to silence members of the British public who wish to disagree with the Government, criticise its inability to grasp the key issues of the day or reject the prevailing progressive orthodoxies.

Where are the assurances that it will be used only to counter hostile and malign foreign actors — and not against British citizens?

Its censorious intentions have been clearly telegraphed. This is chilling, sinister and Orwellian.

[dave @dave110111]

@OliLondonTV

[Liz Parker aka not1fish @not1fish]

@JenKteach

[Steven Barrett @SBarrettBar]

We need criminal investigations of the money wasted on this.

[Bobby @Bobby_elfhire]

@RonniNicole1 Unions are captured by small cliques of extreme-left/communist activists on their executive committees. These minorities set the agenda and drive policy that serves ideology over the interests of the broader membership.

[Ronni Nicole #KPSS @RonniNicole1]

"Sandie Peggie latest: Hero nurse tells tribunal her union 'took trans doctor's side'

Veteran A&E nurse says her Royal College of Nursing rep thought she had 'been disciplined because I had done something wrong' when she complained about a man in the female changing rooms"
https://t.co/VF4PRG1ZPt

[spiked @spikedonline]

Why are so many comedians silent about the Islamist hounding of John Cleese? They defended Monty Python’s right to mock Christian dogma but not Cleese’s right to make fun of Islam. What a bunch of treacherous cowards, says Brendan O’Neill
https://t.co/NdkvdRxBIN

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

Andy Burnham has announced at the UN a new ‘National Centre for Information Defence’ to wage war against ‘untrue narratives’. He claims that “everything we hold dear” is under attack from so-called “misinformation”. This might be the most censorious thing a modern British Government has done.

We already have NSOIT, the Government Communication Service, the Media Monitoring Unit, RICU, the Defending Democracy Taskforce, the Joint Election Security and Preparedness Unit, the FCDO’s Information Threats and Influence Directorate, 77th Brigade, NCSC/GCHQ, the National Cyber Force and the Social Cohesion Taskforce.

Is that not enough? How do we know this new body won’t be weaponised to silence dissent and chill free speech?
Will it reprimand the Government itself? FSU Director of Policy and Research @DavidRoseUK's new briefing argues that the Government has itself been spreading misinformation about misinformation — exaggerating the scale of the threat it poses.

The Culture Secretary, Lisa Nandy, flounced off X, citing the spread of misinformation as a threat to democracy. If government ministers genuinely care about tackling mis- and disinformation, they should stay, debate and challenge falsehoods with more information — not less.

It is vital that the UK defends our democracy against hostile actors such as Russia. But safeguards are essential to prevent bodies established for that purpose from expanding their remit to domestic dissent and policing the social media posts of British citizens who criticise government policy.

We should remember that more than 62,000 people have reportedly been arrested for “speech offences” in Britain over the past five years — including social media posts.

Meanwhile, under its media green paper, Watch This Space, the Labour Government is already proposing measures intended to promote “trustworthy” news sources. The concern is that this could favour established outlets such as the BBC while disadvantaging more critical outlets such as GB News and independent journalism.

The Government needs to explain exactly what powers this new Centre will have, who decides what constitutes an “untrue narrative”, and what safeguards will prevent it from becoming a tool for policing lawful dissent.

2026 Britain is turning more into 1984 by the day. We literally now have a Ministry of Truth.

[Malcolm Clark @TwisterFilm]

Your occasional reminder transgender ideology is driven by a violent hatred of women and their biology. It’s no more “progressive” than old fashioned misogyny was ….just because the woman-haters now wear dresses and make-up. 👇