@dsonoiki No, they just abandon billions of dollars worth of equipment and get 13 service members killed for absolutely no reason other than sheer incompetence
@BernieSanders Every one of you cock bags in congress are bitching on social media that you SHOULD do something, yet none of you are actually doing anything. Get bent, you old fuck.
@Booge11@VVenerabilis@GuyOverThere99@flabeargo They did do that, back in 79. The Iranian hostage crisis. We should have taken them out then, but Carter was too much of a pussy to do it. Now, be-the-nice-guy policy that have marred Iranian foreign policy for the last almost 50 years are finally being called out.
@brad_eth@GuyOverThere99@VVenerabilis@Booge11@flabeargo The prime minister was overthrown in 1952 for nationalizing oil that Great Britain had built the infrastructure for. Even then, it was somewhat friendly to Great Britain and it's allies. Wasn't great, but it wasn't "Death to America" either.
@brad_eth@GuyOverThere99@VVenerabilis@Booge11@flabeargo Iran was friendly with the US until the Iranian Revolution in 79. And even before the coup, they were friendly in the 40s as well. This crap started in 79 under Carter when he declined to extradite the king back to Iran after the Islamic Revolution.
@coloradoraider@MaxVillman Army vs regime change. Two separate things. First modern attack I've seen where the head of the regime was possibly taken out first.
@OldGeorge892@MaxVillman You think they have weapons and assets to give them? They should have steam rolled Ukraine if they had the actual capabilities they claimed to have instead of being bogged down for 4 years and counting. Russian weapons are 30+ years behind NATO and the US
@atlovelovelove@MaxVillman Simple. Take out the regime that is developing nukes and replace it with one friendly that won't. The nukes don't build themselves.