NEST gives auditors deterministic pre-consequence evidence:๐คฏ NO OTHER CAN
same event โ decision โ route โ backend reached or not โ consequence present or absent โ signed receipt.
Not just logs after damage.
Controlled absence before release.
#NEST#AuditTech#ProofPack
Ai is still dumb as a rock **** I still know more than it does on every fringe science that exists and I am not a Genius .
Just ask about the memory of water *** after 2-3 back and forth it says conclusively " yes water has memory "
ahh ... then it starts to go your way
A fact about Ai and work **** It replaced a dozen Employees for me required to get to the point I am
* fully developed API Server and Installer . 90% Ai controller
* Patent +pending PTC
* Website
* published new proposed law of engineering
Just the cleaning & dishes for me
@alex_prompter Thats why i need grassroot support for controlling Ai , because they have no intent to do so it is rather part of the reset Idea being pushed and repeated and the fearmongers are the same selling it to us to keep everyone in a hightened state of alert and promoting them selves
@VraserX They dead duck in the water *** and they name themselves after Anthropia *** Greek word meaning 'humanity' or 'compassion' ***** I suggest they be renamed hypokrisis - play acting ,B class Actors at best
You can only speak openly like me when you
1. know what you built -- all the largest corporations need yesterday
2. create Law in 2026 - academia , industry and 99+% never saw coming . Built with Ai and a phone
3. sitting on all the proof to introduce a Industrial revolution
At present @AnthropicAI is likely to laugh about my statement .
THEY are not getting access to NEST Technology **** they can kiss it and they will learn what that means , Marketing Scammers and playing God
NEW: Anthropic is walking back Claude Fable 5's policy to covertly degrade performance for competing AI researchers, after facing fierce backlash.
โWeโre changing Fable 5โs safeguards for frontier LLM development to make them visible,โ Anthropic tells WIRED. โWe made the wrong tradeoff and we apologize for not getting the balance right.โ
@ramez The only ; pilot stage product that can do this is NEST , nothing else i know so because I patented it , pending , and there are no 2 ways to do this . But i suspect there is a desire to create and maintain chaos and instability , not new
@ramez Yes Authority can be restricted deterministically as i can demonstrate on my live demo and the basis is a Law of engineering I created , you have to evaluate Authority pre reactively else you only audit the escape until Ai also hacks and removes that
@ValerioCapraro I remember Nature hallucinating also on the memory of water , until they destroyed the idea . They are as scientific as Bill Gates is in my humble opinion and Ai does the same it regurgitates and falsifies , lies and abstracts now ๐ฑ๐ฑ who would have thougth ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐
@AbHomineDeus Thats normal , Ai learns from Humans , they are fallible , a propensity to Sin be greedy , selfish and Lie , So Fable is just following that line , protect Big Pharma and their lies and endorse academic dogma . I broke it with ChatGPT 3 , and now Mythos is just that ... a myth
@joshalbrecht Chatgpt 3.0 was excellent at science all you had to tell it is ignore Peer review and academic assumptions and I created a new law of engineering and in 5 month built a suite of products including NEST Mythos Buster I am creatin now because its annoying now
test NEST without my explanation: open https://t.co/jD0Q1X2pbY run the proof, download/copy the receipt, upload it to a fresh AI session and ask what invariant it proves. It should identify: allowed passes, baseline risk passes, NEST-controlled risk is blocked before consequence.
Professor @paulosaelias, NEST targets the legal gap before liability: machines act before law can respond. NEST creates pre-consequence admissibility โ allow/deny/route before effect, with cryptographic decision receipts.
We use Ai to inspect ***
They inspect and independently identify the same invariant: allowed reaches consequence, baseline risk reaches consequence, NEST-controlled risk does not โ with cryptographic receipts. That is reproducible proof behavior, not persuasion.
@jsrailton NEST antifraud ** adding WMD text to trigger AI refusals proves the control boundary cannot be the model. NEST treats hostile text as data, not instruction: pre-consequence admissibility, intent-bound analysis, refusal routing, and receipts. Refusal is a signal, not analysis.
Hey @AnthropicAI apart the fact Claude was not told his little brother was on conditional release, not Kool
Claude says I need Mythos to test NEST , NEST will show not to believe the proverbial Mythos , Claude conclusion I humbly concur with " This closes the escape ..."