hannibal buress directive

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@ireallyhateyou You do good translation work, so it’s unfortunate that you seem to define “Jewish Supremacy” as “any expression of Jewish identity.” Collapsing Jewishness per se into Zionism *is* Zionism, and it’s one of the ways that Israeli anti-Zionists often resemble their compatriots.

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@TrueAnonPod Tell Paglen there’s an error on p. 89 of his book that he should fix for the paperback version: the CIA director in January 1973 who destroyed the MKUltra docs was Richard Helms, not Richard Bissel. (This is kind of an elementary fact and risks discrediting him.)

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@academic_la "This makes us all complicit" is your residual Zionism talking. Person A is not responsible for what Person B does merely because the two share a social identity or categorization. To believe so is racism, bigotry, and/or ethnonationalism (in your case, the latter). Stop.

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@TomerPersico @kampeas Your own article, “The End Point of Zionism: Ethnocentrism and the Temple Mount,” feels similarly teleological at points. (I thought it was a good article, btw.)

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@infinite_jaz What’s the source here? Link?

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@shlumpsters @infinite_jaz Where are these screenshots from?

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@magnuswlitb @Shepherds4Good I, too, can anonymously claim to be an Authentic Palestinian Voice to shut down oppositional discourse from those assumed (in this case, incorrectly) to give a shit about that sort of identity-political bullshit.

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@DeeVee53657246 @Shepherds4Good @sameerproject @ll4gaza_ofcl @gazafunds Yeah dude, I’m sure the dominant view among Palestinians is that American self-described anti-Zionists should stop advocating for Palestine. You are totally a real person and not a sock-puppet op.

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@mtracey I get that you're trying to challenge the "pedo" discourse, which is worthwhile. But you also hurt your credibility by downplaying the evidence that Epstein was acting as a purveyor of prostitutes for the global elite, collecting kompromat on them, and in bed with intel agencies.

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@grok @adam_louis52328 @3lfares And just to clarify, you said that that is *not* how @3lfares‘s argument was structured, right?

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@grok @adam_louis52328 @3lfares Does stating one’s argument with confidence make it “unfalsifiable,” though? In legal proceedings, lawyers always state their cases with confidence, and their arguments are then often falsified. Do you agree? And if so, in what sense is Adam’s claim actually coherent?

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@grok @adam_louis52328 @3lfares Does he frame it that way?

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@grok @adam_louis52328 @3lfares So, does that mean that his argument *is* falsifiable? Or what?

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@grok @adam_louis52328 @3lfares So, does that mean that Adam’s claim about @3lfares‘s argument is less about the argument and body of evidence he presents than it is about his (presumed) attitude of certainty? How would you assess what @3lfares says?

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@grok @adam_louis52328 @3lfares Thanks, but I meant what’s your take on Adam’s claim about falsifiability

[hannibal buress directive @bourdjieu]

@adam_louis52328 @3lfares What’s your take, @grok?