@karol@Heminator@nypost That’s the thing with people like Krugman. As @nntaleb says, he has no skin in the game. He writes columns proposing to give others’ money away, and pats himself on the back as an Oracle. He doesn’t live with it. Just gets paid to signal.
@antihero_kate Just setting the stage for lawsuits against the USPS or justification for rioting if they lose. They are not stupid, in my opinion. Just corrupted.
@JayCostTWS He seems to think that:
1. Republicans have a desire to be dictated to by Democrats so as not to upset anyone.
And
2. That he will have any value on the left outside of being a turncoat.
@KevinDuffey Add revenue sharing with players of some sort and everyone wins and players would only want to play in that system. The Premier Conference.
@NRO@jimgeraghty Not in the age of QE. There are no compromises because each side can digitally print whatever they want for their allies. Take a look at how many constitutional amendments have passed since the dollar became fiat in 1971.
@jasonrantz@josh_hammer Has to be a horribly tough thing to read as a rank and file officer. The only support you have is justifiably leaving. And they are left to the jackals.
@KlongName@secupp This one cares about illegal immigration, ran on it, and was democratically elected. Nobody made them bring their children or themselves here. They are aware of and obviously accept the risk.
@vidiotfl@KlongName@secupp I can’t really think of a vehicle that obscures rational discourse more than media “fact checkers”.
“Hey, nobody believes what we report, let’s call it fact checking”
@KlongName@secupp If your point of view is that the sole purpose of immigration law is to keep families together, then I would agree. If you think the purpose is to keep out individuals who do not follow the law it is more complicated.