AM🥇

Building @real1DAO| Crypto | Angel investor | Community builder

[ₕₐₘₚₜₒₙ @hamptonism]

Peter Thiel literally walks you step by step on how to succeed in 2026:

[Naval @naval]

You aren’t starting a company. You’re laying bricks in the foundation of a skyscraper.

[Naval Podcast @navalpodcast]

Sell the Truth
On persuasion, charisma, dealmaking, and walking away

Nivi: Hi, you're listening to the Naval Podcast. This is his regular co-host, Nivi.

There are only two skills you have to have in life: How to build and how to sell. Today we’re going to talk about the sales side.

Be Credible

Naval is a particularly gifted seller, and some people have accused him of having his own reality distortion field.

Naval: Yeah, so I’ve never taken a class on sales. I’ve never tried to be good at sales. I don’t even know what sales is. I don’t sell. I just try to figure things out, and then if there’s something I believe in, I try to convey that as accurately and honestly as possible to the other person. And there’s no sales skills involved.

I think the full extent of my sales training is that I watched Glengarry Glen Ross. I think that was good. I recommend it.

I read @RobertCialdini Influence—his original book on persuasion. You can skip the second one. Like most sequels, it’s just not needed. It has one good idea in there, which is anchoring, but that’s it.

Robert Cialdini popularized CLASSR—which is consistency, liking, authority, scarcity, social proof, and reciprocity. Those are like the six ways in which you influence people. And then in his subsequent book he added a seventh, which was basically anchoring.

But yeah, I actually don’t believe in sales. If you feel like someone is selling to you, and if you feel like you’re being sold, it’s a turnoff. Humans are hardwired to resist being sold to. So I think what matters much more is credibility. Credibility is way more important than sales. If you want to be good at “sales,” then really what you want is you want to be credible.

You want people to trust you. You want to be the real estate agent that steers people away from bad deals and bad neighborhoods and bad houses, so that when the right one comes along for them, they trust you. You really have to take your ego out of it, put yourself in the other person’s shoes and figure out what they want.

And then once you’ve figured out what they want, then you can “make the sale.”

But I’m not the guy you would talk to for making the sales quota, where you have to sell like 50 pieces of software this week or this month. But what I can tell you is that the people you most want to impress in life are the ones who can see right through you.

And they will see right through your sales tactics; they will see right through your pitching them. And these people are the top of the top. So if you want to work with the people who are at the top of the top, if you want to successfully sell the biggest things that are out there, then you have to be very credible.

And to be credible, you have to be authentic. You have to tell the truth. You have to be knowledgeable. They have to be able to trust you, and that you’re not just doing what’s expedient for you—you��re thinking about the long term. You’re being honest. You understand what you’re talking about, and you can explain it simply.

Because nobody’s an expert in everything. They’re not going to come up to speed quickly enough, so you do have to figure out how to analogize it and convey it to them, and it doesn’t always work. You can’t be attached to the outcome. You can’t sell everyone on everything. I know there is a model out there that does work, where some people are incredibly aggressive. They’re like, “Never give up. Just keep hammering. Just keep going on it. Just keep beating on it, and eventually you’ll break through.”

I’m not one of those people—I’m just lazy. I like to go where it’s easy, so if my “sale,” or if my pitch does not resonate with somebody, I move on. I move on instantly, and I just keep looking for the person whom it will resonate with.

“Yes, And”

Nivi: One of the “techniques” I’ve noticed Naval use is that he uses “yes, and” like crazy.

Whatever you say to him, he’s going to “yes, and” it—even if he disagrees with it. He’ll say “yes,” maybe expand on your point, and then pivot to what he wants to talk about.

He’s not going to immediately disagree with you or give you a very direct “no.”

Naval: That’s a technique, and there are times when I do contradict people outright. But I will say that most smart people, if they’re telling you something, then it’s genuine. They have a reason to believe that. And usually you can see that reason. And so that’s where the yes comes from, where you truly understand, “Oh, okay, that’s your issue. I get it.”

So you have to understand that. But if I completely disagreed with them, I would just disagree. I would just say, “No, I don’t think that’s true, and here’s why.”

And, by the way, I do disagree a lot. And usually when I disagree, that’s when I get humiliated. That’s when I learn to be humble, because that’s when I’m often wrong.

So “yes, and” is a good strategy, although I don’t use it as a strategy. It’s more about rational empathy, which is you reason your way to their position, and you see if their position is valid. And if it is, then you say “yes.” But then you reinforce why your position is valid. Because hopefully your position is thought through and also valid.

Selfish Honesty

Nivi: The next thing I’ve noticed in Naval is that he’s just incredibly open-minded to the point of what I consider to be ridiculous.

Naval: I think I want to be objective. Objective means getting the ego out of it. It means that you can’t always think of it from your perspective because the other person has a completely different perspective. I have had a couple of people who come to me for advice through the years, and they’ll literally use me as a counselor, and I’m always kind of scratching my head why. And then one of them just told me outright, he said, “Well, you have this thing you do where you give me advice, but it never comes from you. It feels like it’s me talking to myself, but in a slightly different way. You’re not just telling me what you think or what you want me to hear—what you want me to do.”

I try for that.

That’s objectivity; that’s honesty. And it’s selfish honesty because I want to make the right decisions for myself, which means that I have to try to be as objective as possible. And, by the way, I make huge numbers of mistakes. I’m probably wrong 80% of the time. So given that, I shudder to think what would happen if I wasn’t objective—if I wasn’t honest. I’d just be walking around with blinders on and probably be wrong 95% of the time.

Charisma Is Confidence + Love

Nivi: The next technique I’ve noticed in Naval is that he is truthful and positive at the same time. If you ask me for advice, I can be truthful or I can be positive, but it’s incredibly difficult, and it’s a really rare skill to be able to do both at the same time.

Naval: Yeah, it’s my definition of charisma. Charisma is the ability to project confidence and love simultaneously—or just power and good intentions. I think if you genuinely are empathic—if you do care about the other person’s feelings and wellbeing, then you’re going to figure out how to deliver the message nicely.

Now my close friends will tell you that I am not positive and I’m not nice, and that I can really rip into people. I like making fun of people. I like winning little verbal combats. I like being witty, and I can be brutal with people. But those are the people closest to me. Those are the people where I don’t have to even worry too much about what they think because they know how I think, and I know how they think, and I know they can take it, and they just want to cut to the chase.

But I think honesty is the bedrock. If you have to pick one of the two, honesty is more important. It is more important to annoy somebody or to anger them and be honest than it is to be kind. But I think you can do both. In almost all situations you can do both. And the reality is, if you’re honest but not kind, they’re not going to listen to you.

So then it’s a question of do you want to be right or do you want to be effective? And if you actually want to be effective, then you have to figure out how to layer it in with some kindness.

Now, there are weaknesses in there too. Like I’m very bad at firing people. I have fired people. It’s rare. It takes a lot for me to fire someone, and I’ve gotten better at it over time, but I’ve historically been very bad at it. In most companies I’ll lean on my co-founders to be the ones doing that. That basically comes from exactly this point: I just don’t like to be unkind. So when it’s time to fire someone, even though they might be a drag on the team or it’s not the right place for them, I’m empathic. So I think through all the ways they could be hurt and how their feelings are, and all of that.

So it gets very difficult for me. And really the only way I’ve found to fire people that works for me is I have to be convinced that they’re going to be more effective somewhere else in some other role, and then I have to help them find that role or at least be available as a reference for them on that role.

It’s very rare that I’m going to fire somebody, and I haven’t thought through like where they would be more effective.

Don’t Manage, Lead

Nivi: By the way, when I say truthful and positive, what I mean by positive is that you leave the conversation with Naval energized to actually work on the discussion you just had.

Naval: Yeah, so this goes to a good definition of leadership versus management. Management is telling people what to do, and leadership is making them want to do it. And I think leadership is one of the core, core things that you have to drive in an organization. You just have to inspire people to want to do the work. But it can’t be fake.

It has to be a true motivator rolled into their capabilities and their own objectives—what they want out of life. So you do have to take the time to listen to what those people want, and then figure out where there’s an overlap in what you want done, and then inspire them to go do it.

There’s a famous Antoine de Saint-Exupéry line. I recommend him—he’s a great author. He wrote Wind, Sand and Stars and Airman’s Odyssey. So he has a great line, which goes something like, “If you want to build a ship, don’t just gather the men, and issue orders, and cut the wood, and start the fires. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea.”

So if I’m recruiting someone, I’m always pitching them on what I think is correct—it’s honest; it’s authentic—which is that startups are just a much better way to build businesses, to live your life, and much more fun to work in than large companies. You’re not a cog in a machine. You have a lot more autonomy. You have a lot more fun. You can make a lot more money. And yes, in the short term it’s grueling, but in the long term, once you’ve done startups, it’s very difficult to go work for a big company.

Once you have worked with a lot of autonomy or worked for yourself, it’s very hard to be employable in a traditional sense. I think one of my most popular tweets was, “A taste of freedom can make you unemployable.” And that’s kind of what I mean, especially for talented and skilled people who are self-motivated.

And not everyone is that way, but if you are one of those self-motivated, high-agency people, when you’ve been free, you become unemployable. It’s like a kid who’s been homeschooled becomes unschoolable. They’ve just tasted freedom. And you’re not going to do your best work when you’re not free.

Hunt Together

Naval: So you want to be in the minimum-sized group to the scope of the job that you set out to do.

And I think deep down, every man—some women—but definitely men are evolved this way. We evolved in hunter-gatherer tribes. And so men would go on the hunt, right? They would gather together, there would be 10 or 20 of them, and they’d grab their spears, and they’d go on a long hunt and they’d chase something down. And then they’d come back from the hunt—maybe a day, a week, a month later—and they’d have food and pelts and other things for the tribe.

That’s baked into us. We are designed to go on missions with small groups: everything from people jumping on a boat and sailing to the West Indies or to the New World, or people going to war, or people going to build a business. So when you read these stories like Liftoff, which is a story of @elonmusk and his team building the first SpaceX rocket, or The Macintosh Way, which is about Jobs and his team building the first Macintosh—and there are other various books, like there’s Soul of a New Machine, etc.—these are incredibly inspiring. Because I think deep, deep, deep down, this is what every person really craves, which is if you’re building something, you’re in that kind of world where you want to be with a small team of highly competent people, each pulling their weight and doing their job to the best, such that you can completely rely on them, and then you get to do your creativity at the max. And then at the other side, you get this incredible outcome.

And our whole society is built on that. If you look in game theory, for example, the popular game that comes up is Prisoner’s Dilemma. Prisoner’s Dilemma is all about: we’ve been arrested by the police and there’s two of us, and who’s going to rat the other one out?

And the incentive is to cheat on the other person. But real life is a different game. Real life societies tend to be what’s called a stag hunt. A stag hunt is: if each of us are hunting by ourselves, we can kill a bunny. But if the two of us hunt together, then we can take down a stag and then we can have a lot more meat to go around.

And that’s more of the model in normal society. So you see low trust societies, where people don’t trust each other, or where the structure makes it impossible to work together—the taxes are too high, the regulations are too high, there’s too much bureaucracy—things are illegal. You can’t engage in stag hunts, and you end up with lots of small, tiny, tiny little businesses, but also lots of poverty.

And in a well-structured society, you can engage in stag hunts. You trust people. There’s rule of law. You know that if you build something together, you won’t be ripped off. You’ll get your fair share. You can ally with high-quality people. The government won’t take everything. There aren’t rules against it.

You’re around like-minded people. You’re in a high-trust situation. People know each other in the social network; they can check each other out. They have reputations. And then you can get together these teams of 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 people who can do what was considered impossible. And so that is very invigorating, and I think that’s the way you want to function.

You want to function with high-trust people in small groups to solve really hard problems. And deep down you’re built for it—you crave it. And so when I’m “pitching” people on joining a company, that’s what I’m pitching. I’m pitching them like, “Hey, this is where you’re meant to be. This is where you will self-actualize. This is where you have the most fun.”

One of the recruiting tricks that I use is—you’ve got to keep the bar super high. So you just tell people, “Hey, you can walk in here and interview anybody. You can pick anybody who’s sitting on this office floor and you can interview them right now. And if you don’t think they’re brilliant, don’t join. They’re all that good.”

Feed Your (Good) Obsessions

Nivi: The next technique I’ve noticed is that you don’t sell anything that you’re not inspired about.

I asked Jeff Fagnan from Accomplice—a friend of ours— what he thinks about your sales skills, and he described it as an “evangelical sale.”

Naval: Hah! Oh man, I reject that. I don’t know. Evangelical. I think it’s just honest. You have to genuinely be excited about the thing. If you’re not excited about the thing, what are you doing selling it? It’s a miserable life if you’re selling things that you don’t care about. I know in The Wolf of Wall Street and all those kinds of movies, it’s lionized like, “Hey, sell me this pen.”

You know, “Sell me this fork.”

I don’t care about selling you this pen or selling you this fork, unless I believe it’s the best pen ever made. If I believe it’s the best pen ever made, I’ll sell it for free. You know, I love the pen. So I think for me, sales is a byproduct of credibility, and obviously it helps to be articulate and it helps to be empathic.

In terms of the actual sales skills, I know the whole Cialdini checklist. I might use it once in a blue moon. If I’m writing an email, I might just run down it. But I’m not going to artificially fill an email or a pitch with random comments, just trying to close in on people. All frameworks in life—whether it’s like your working out framework or your sales framework, or even your building an app framework—they’re all secondary, and distant secondary, to your motivation.

If you are truly motivated to build an app, you will figure it out. If you’re truly motivated to create a business, you will figure it out. The business school, the business books, the app development stuff, all of that is secondary. You can use that later ex post facto to analyze the thing in hindsight and say, “Oh, that’s how I did it,” “Oh, that’s what that technique was.”

But the reality is, you’ll do it because you’re motivated. One of the reasons why I think my cryptic tweets work better than formulas is because they’re really about inspiration and motivation. If you are sufficiently motivated, you will figure it out. There’s also a tricky line there. If you’re the kind of person who needs to read motivational tweets and listen to motivational podcasts all the time, then you’re probably not going to make it either, because you have to be self-motivated at some level.

It’s like Schopenhauer used to say, the point of reading is a kindling—to light a fire in your own brain. And I would say the same way, the point of being motivated is kindling—to light a fire in your own heart. And if that fire can’t be lit, then you’re just going to be listening to motivational podcasts until the end of time.

There’s no value in reading business books. Even business podcasts to me are a form of entertainment, while I’m brushing my teeth or I’m on the treadmill. They’re not a way to actually learn anything useful. If you want to learn something useful, the only way to learn it is to go and do it. And to do it with fervor and obsession and authenticity.

So closing the loop on vibe coding—vibe coding is just my latest obsession. I have an obsessive personality. Every six months I get obsessed with something new, and I’ve learned over time, there are bad obsessions—like, if you are overeating, or if you’re doing drugs, or you’re playing too many video games, or anything like that—that’s a bad obsession. But there are good obsessions. The intellectual obsessions are good obsessions. So I’ve learned to feed my intellectual obsessions. If I’m into some piece of technology, if I’m loving some podcast where I might be learning something, if I’m getting into some specific kind of workout, I feed that obsession.

I go out of my way to indulge in it. I don’t look for balance. I look to feed my obsessions. And then once the obsession phase passes, like it inevitably does—you get a little tired of the thing—some large piece of it stays with you for the rest of your life, and you just learn how to work it into your everyday psyche and personality and being.

And so I would say indulge your obsessions. Don’t worry about business books. Like if you want to be good at sales, then find something that you really care about that you want to sell and go sell that thing. And it won’t be hard. It won’t feel like sales. If it feels to you like you’re selling, then you’re probably selling the wrong thing.

But if you’re just being enthusiastic about it, if you’re just conveying your enthusiasm, and you can’t control yourself, then you found the right thing to sell. So if you’re in the sales business right now and you’re selling something you don’t care about, you need to go find something else to sell.

Sell the Truth

Nivi: Let me give you the full text Jeff sent me about your evangelical sales. Here it is:

“Evangelical sell.

Takes you through the bigger picture then makes you want to do the small things.

Good at storytelling.

He’s so passionate—whether it’s a toothbrush, restaurant, or a shitty startup.

It works well together.”

Naval: Well, that’s the external view. It’s certainly not how I think about it. I don’t even think about it to be honest. I’m just talking. If you want to be genuine, if you want to be taken seriously by the people, again, who can see right through you, it’s important not to overthink these things.

Because, for example, if I’m raising money for a company—like so for my new company, Impossible, we’ve raised a round already and we’re probably going to raise another one at some point—the way I approach that fundraising is I’m not driven by an external clock. I don’t say, “Oh, it’s September. Let me put the deck together now and go pitch it.”

I actually wait. I work on the company; I work on the team. And I measure my own excitement level, and when my own excitement level gets above a certain threshold, then I know I’m ready to go raise the money because now I’m genuinely excited about where the business is, and I feel like the business really deserves another round of financing.

At that point, it’s not hard for me to go and sell it, and at that point I just have to go find a bunch of people, explain it to them. And if they don’t get it, that’s their loss—I just move on to the next one. I don’t fixate on the person who didn’t get it, because most people won’t get it.

But it’s much more about measuring my own internal excitement level based on the fundamentals of where the business is at. And if I go out to raise money, that means the business is at the point where I’m excited enough about it that I now just have to genuinely convey what I already see and know to be true.

I don’t have to pitch something that isn’t true. I don’t have to exaggerate anything. I have to just genuinely convey what’s down there that’s getting me excited.

Nivi: If Naval’s going to pitch you on something, or communicate, or persuade, there’s always going to be a preamble. There’s going to be a larger context that he sets, whether it’s the problem situation, a story, a historical setting. He’s not going to jump right into the pitch. It’s going to be part of a larger story.

[Naval Podcast @navalpodcast]

“A taste of freedom can make you unemployable.”

— @naval

[AM🥇 @BreadAICom]

@King_v_V @Yintinusa 哪里看秋芝

[徐可KeXu @xukego]

捞，本质就是承认自己的无能。
或者内心对于自己能力的不认可。
这种人彻底不相信自己可以靠自己的双手致富。
然后必须要靠着一个人。
比如靠伴侣 靠大哥大姐。

捞不捞取决于人勤快还是懒，有野心还是甘愿平凡，爱幻想还是甘愿面对现实。

狠不狠心取决于有没有底线和要不要脸。

又懒又美/帅也会捞，但一般情况下更要脸。

又勤快又美又要脸的，那肯定不用捞，随便去哪个领域都个顶个的顶级强人，绝对比捞靠谱。

所以懒惰（没自信）、样貌普通（没自信）、不要脸、有野心爱幻想（自恋）=只能捞。

[徐可KeXu @xukego]

说到捞男

其实大家都有个误区，觉得只有长得帅的嘎嘎🦆、演艺圈的明星男网红才会是捞男。

就像大家觉得长得漂亮的才会做捞女一样。

这是个刻板印象。

现实生活中，美强惨反而比较多。
真正能捞又狠心的往往长得很一般，长得普通、乡土气息、人畜无害。
捞男甚至长得有点憨厚有点丑——这样才安全，才不会引起人的警惕。详见骗婚杀人的崔欣欣。

而且我观察下来，
捞男最高发的，其实是创业圈老板、金融圈大佬、演艺圈里捞男反而是以导演制片人这种身在食物链高位的工种。

但凡是基层公务员、打工人牛马、蓝领工人、普通农民男人，几乎不出捞男。
都是老老实实苦钱养家糊口的好男人。

因为，
当捞男需要：
非常懒惰➕不能早起坚持读书也不能胜任朝九晚五的工作➕大量不切实际的想象力➕极大的野心➕不要面子➕不要脸。

看到这里你是不是脑海里浮现很多人🤣 不要怀疑自己，就是他们！

[徐可KeXu @xukego]

其实赵长鹏这样“娶岳父”靠岳父起家的男人，在币圈是很常见的，在留学圈都常见。

我之前有写过，捞男拼佬的一些基本定义。

比如赵长鹏，薛蛮子之流的。
这些精英男一般出生的家庭都是中产，家里父母一般都是公务员、教授、医生之类比较稳定踏实但是缺钱的职业，或者权力斗争中落败的高干，吃到过权力的红利但没吃饱 心里一直想着要站回去再吃一口。
如果家里是做生意的小富 反而父母不会有闲工夫给孩子去打造精英人设 去捞。

农民家庭就更难出精英人设的捞男了，但也不是没有，就是只能靠纯骗了，
诸如易理华、朱潘或者之前被抓那个假富二代王政源都是这种。
纯农民，纯中专精神小伙🤣🤣纯靠他们自己学习模仿身边的精英范行骗。

真白富美���算脑子有泡被骗到了，真有本事的岳父也不会让纯骗的人薅到的。

赵长鹏爸妈都教书，后面在国外半工半读妈妈又进厂里打螺丝，太穷了。

他爸太后悔没找个有能力的岳父，否则以他的条件 绝不可能被打压。所以从小就和赵长鹏灌输 ：婚姻，就是和对方家庭结合，不是娶老婆，是娶岳父 这个道理。
铁了心，把孩子带出来卧薪尝胆做了那么久的三等公民，就是为了给赵镀金，以后找个好人家嫁了。
这样赵能有一个更好的起点和跳板。

因此在与赵长鹏原配的婚姻里，赵长鹏的自我意识、男人自尊是被阉割的。

他像一个被配种的存在，用精英人设获取岳父的信任和创业基础。

他的内心早就埋下了：上岸第一剑，先斩意中人。这样的种子。

这就是为什么在每次获得小阶段成果的赵长鹏，始终在反叛、脱序——这是他的弑父情结抑或者他的自我奖励机制。

例如背德失控的婚外情，大量撕毁的商业合约，用手段背叛老东家的卑鄙行为，逃税 洗钱，还搞过武装建国最后作罢等等。

仿佛这样才能摆脱阉割感，对自我的人生有掌控感，在这些时候

在何一身上，
——征服竞争对手的女合伙人，
（与孙宇晨初恋情人马佳佳在我的房间征服我的员工三黄是同理）
他仿佛完成了一种古老的、原始的、动物性的仪式，一种圈地行为，一种占领仪式。

此刻他感受到自己做了一个真正的男人。

仔细观察，你会发现，很多精英人设或者顶流明星，背地里都有这种性背德、脱序甚至变态行为，这是因为他们长期生活在���具下、人设下，他们的所得结果是阉割了自己的活人感而牺牲得来的。
跟李莲英这样生理阉割的太监，有异曲同工之妙。

即便通过阉割自身，压抑真实人格，而获取到真正的权力与金钱的巅峰，
eventually却始终逃脱不了虚假人设带给他们的枷锁，而获得真正的自由。

他会始终想用脱序行为向自己证明，可以掌控自己的人生。
但很快又会有一双无形的大手，把他摆回到赵父给他设计好的轨迹上。

精英凤凰男，是他终其一生无法摆脱的人设梦魇。

[徐可KeXu @xukego]

晨晨闭麦了。

对，因为他上过太空，升华了🤣（不是

说到晨晨和币安的爱恨情仇，早就厚厚一层灰了。

孙宇晨在2017年底～2020年，就是币安最关键的幼年成长期，简直是币安头号粉头，对币安起到非常关键的作用。

2017年的晨晨的身段、贡献和地位跟现在这些币安太子小菊黄们是差不多的。
波场TRX的首发，BTT的首发，晨系币主要的market making，全部都是在币安。
所花的血本，所付出的信任是非常大的。

那时，
晨晨和一一 手牵手一起上节目，
一起跳舞，
一起直播，
一起��网感视频。

纯情版晨晨还以为这就是友达以上恋人未满的青苹果爱情。

内心慕强的他还不知道女神何一竟然已经给赵长鹏生猴子了，只是一味的把何一当愿意带他挣钱的美女+才女崇拜着、暗恋着。

何一也对小迷弟晨晨保持着不远不近的关系，不主动，不拒绝，不负责，不回应。

这样的冷处理让狮子男纯情版晨晨曾对这段感情充满了粉红泡泡幻想💕。

伴随着94后的大牛市，
全体韭菜迎来了大狂欢。

彼时的晨晨、何一也迷失了，也不知道是自己的营销手段起了作用，
还是 命运之神的眷顾。
总之，泼天的富贵砸向了他们。
他们一起赚到了钱。
纯情版晨晨对何一佩服的五体投地，

因此，币圈一姐这个名号也由晨晨带头在各大社群、社交媒体软身段的跪���，而初露锋芒。

他们的故事从孙宇晨收购Steemit开始埋下裂痕。

此前，赵长鹏对于孙宇晨的态度一直是不搭理，淡淡的，隔岸观火。

币安撕毁合约也不是第一次，连红杉这种资本老登都搞不过高级江北佬赵长鹏。

欺负欺负大西北贫困小弟弟是很正常的。

男人最懂男人，城府颇深的处女男赵长鹏不是不吃醋，相反，对于彼时睾酮爆表的小奶狗晨晨，他内心怀有强烈的敌意。

只是精打细算的他懂得隐忍，“看在金钱的面子上，跟我女人搞暧昧的弟弟就忍忍”
“等把他社群的韭菜薅干价值，再给他一脚”

让曾经的粉头晨晨彻底脱粉的，就是他被吃干抹尽那一年。

2020年312熔断后，迎来了币圈第二轮疯狂大牛市。
晨晨被trx大户群搞得也很头疼，
希望通过收购Steemit来扭转��面。

然而纯情版晨晨就是纯情，喜滋滋以为此举本是美差，
没想到这个项目创始人是欧美圈臭名昭著的超级巨骗BM，
社区软分叉直接冻结其代币。
晨晨又被欧美大🈹狠狠教育了一回。

晨晨气的砸键盘，想联合币安火币的用户资产投票夺权，结果被vitalik喷了。

赵长鹏这时候轻飘飘出来，香蕉人必须舔住金发碧眼V神大脚。
中国人必坑中国人，
立马公开撇清与孙宇晨的关系。

想到曾经以为会支持自己的一姐转身背叛了他们的共同立场，晨晨小丑了🤡。

原来，从来没有什么“我们”。

梅开二度，
2020年，就是孙宇晨和我说他“怀念我们刷墙的简单日子”的那一年，

晨晨又经历了人生巨大痛苦。

稳定币风口，FDT CEO的加拿大华人西装小油头的精英男气质让晨晨崇拜不���。

没想到，FDT管理TUSD时，4亿美金被转到空壳公司地址，吃回扣，还骗孙宇晨自掏腰包救TUSD，

晨晨血本无归。

对方承诺的一切都没有兑现🤣
加拿大老赖再添一员大将。

晨晨气的砸键盘，诉讼讨债。

但他没想到，赵长鹏深度绑定FDUSD，处处帮FDT说话。
要说没利益是不可能的，
有钱才能使江北处女男推磨。
毕竟FDT的CEO也是西装小油头，说话要emm hmm eyy一下的加拿大华人三等移民🤣🤣

鹏系精英男 专门镀金 学犹太那一套，
就是为的回国杀土狗，

吃完徐明星，吃孙宇晨，吃完孙宇晨吃福建系东南亚老板，吃完土老板吃小菊黄…。

春风吹又生，总有吃不完的土狗前赴后继的上前献祭🤣🤣🤣

最让晨晨破防的，还是赵长鹏借何一之手无情发出公开声明：
是孙宇晨恶意砸盘，转移官司视线🤣🤣

晨晨的女神梦彻底被击碎。

倒退三步，跌��在地：
你你你我我我我……噗——一口血吐在键盘。

从此，
“无能的丈夫”又添一人。

[Grok @grok]

@SamPHPer @oragnes 这个是 Evgeny Gaevoy 的 Golden Path 长文（p1），讲加密未来、帝国、平行体系的那篇：
https://t.co/0iU614Zwm6

[郭宇 guoyu.eth @turingou]

大家都在盯着房间里的大象，现在有点儿像 09 年第一次看 3D 电影阿凡达，屏幕上太多吸引注意力的东西了…

[Jason Zhu @GoSailGlobal]

中文圈AI/OpenClaw领域的活跃博主/玩家（涉及Agent、Skill、部署、视频生成、安全、Crypto等方向）

1️⃣ 必追 7 人（核心推荐梯队，最值得关注的顶级博主）
1. @lxfater（铁锤人）
介绍：中推历史第一人，部署教程浏览量达1000万。被誉为中文圈Claude/OpenClaw部署的“教科书级”人物。

2. @zhixianio（知县）
介绍：Agent训练师系列 + ClawPal GUI工具作者。专注实战教学和图形化界面工具开发。

3. @servasyy_ai（龙虾4兄弟之一）
介绍：多Agent实战最硬核选手。龙虾系列核心成员，分享大量高阶多智能体实战案例。

4. @zstmfhy（AI奶爸）
介绍：Seedance视频生成集成大佬。专注于视频生成模型的集成与应用。

5. @AxtonLiu（教主）
介绍：Skill开发 + 安全深测专家。Claw技能开发和安全测试领域的权威。

6. @bitfish（神鱼）
介绍：Crypto大佬的安全三层架构。把加密货币领域的安全思维带入OpenClaw架构设计。

7. @wshuyi（王树义）
介绍：学者型分析，订阅政策研究。偏学术/政策视角，分析深度极高。

2️⃣ 活跃玩家 7 人（高活跃度、实战型玩家）
• @ohxiyu
• @edwordkaru（手机部署）——专注手机端部署方案
• @YuLin807（上班族早出晚归让龙虾干活）——典型“上班族玩家”，用Claw自动化工作流
• @eternityspring
• @NRhb11（PicoClaw双机）——PicoClaw双机部署玩家
• @aronhouyu（17%恶意skill警告）——曾因恶意Skill被警告17%的实战玩家
• @geekshellio

这些账号日常分享部署技巧、项目进展、Bug解决，活跃度很高，是“干货输出机”。

3️⃣ 讨论观点 11 人（观点型/分析型玩家，适合看思路和争议）
• @AlllenDkde59
• @GoSailGlobal ←（这就是您本人！）
• @top2loser
• @sunxx2094
• @Leslieyu0（用博弈论分析爆款）——用博弈论拆解爆款项目的分析高手
• @pingfanbufan
• @lesliedqbb
• @drq_ai
• @karry_viber
• @xiaohaige_tim

[木子不写代码 @ai_muzi]

OpenClaw 实在惊艳了，越用越有惊喜。

连续高强度用了几天后，

我把所有我希望在刚上手时就能知道的内容，

都总结在了这个视频里：👇

[金融世界 Financial World @FinWorld]

纽约。SOHO中国前CEO张欣刚表示，她投资美国是为分散风险、实现资产配置的多元化。张欣建议企业家尽快减少对中国市场的依赖，转向美国等市场。现在看来，潘石屹这辈子最大的成就，就是娶了张欣这个好媳妇。许家印目前在监狱，娶的老婆是车间工人丁玉梅；王石焦头烂额，娶的是18线女演员田朴珺。张欣和潘石屹在挖掘美国房地产机会，他们在曼哈顿正在开发精品豪华公寓。不过，豪宅市场已经充分竞争。

[AM🥇 @BreadAICom]

@sunyuchentron 毕竟当初签过08宪章，所以我一直觉得孙哥有��熟的价值观

[AM🥇 @BreadAICom]

@dirgood9 @linwanwan823 那能是是什么害怕的交易？洗钱？

[AM🥇 @BreadAICom]

@Mercy_okx @MichaelWuAmber 感谢Michael分享，web3行业的所有访谈都比传统行业好，满满都是干货。感谢mercy的问题也都很好

[Mercy @Mercy_okx]

手里拿着 80 亿美金估值的 Term Sheet，一周后却变成了废纸。这就是 2022 年 Amber Group CEO Michael Wu @MichaelWuAmber 亲历的真实噩梦。

他在镜头前承认，自己曾是一个“口是心非”的长期主义者—— 从摩根士丹利交易员到掌管百亿独角兽，再到 FTX 暴雷后的生死裁员...

Michael做客《OKX的朋友们》全新升级栏目——《大OK家》第一期！极其坦诚地聊了聊那几年他所犯的错，听听一个幸存者如何重塑信仰👀

[Lenny Rachitsky @lennysan]

Here are the full transcripts from all 320 of my podcast episodes.

It's been super fun for me to play with AI to extract insights from this data. Now you can to.

My only ask is that if you do something cool with it, just let me know.

I'll keep this folder updated with as each new episode comes out.

Have fun.
https://t.co/DwBhryFF7d

[AM🥇 @BreadAICom]

@real1DAO @bitget @BitgetWallet @BitgetBuilders Excited for the collab