@Harrison_Steel@ATinyGreenCell I second the all comments are welcome. I love preprints because they are mot static. We can always update them to expland, improve or correct. Just like science should be ๐
@Harrison_Steel@ATinyGreenCell Thanks for letting us know about the device you are selling. We will be sure to include references to your paper and the others you mentioned in a future preprint update.
I think it is worth noting that all of our instructions are available on github/Zenodo and a very detailed.
@ATinyGreenCell I find Threads to have more content I like. Not much science on any of these sites compared to the old Twitter though, so I use them all less.
@bielleogy@ATinyGreenCell I do him most start off with some integrity and most bad actors learn to be bad. So there are many examples you hear about of people that go from bad to good. That may also be bc of negative bias in our stories and memories too.
@com_ecology@tomkXY One crazy part is that senior PIs have so much less to gain by a Nature paper (or another Nature paper!), but they keep up the system and expectations. Jr researchers are dependent on them for promotions in most places, or to even get funding and keep their jobs.
@haesleinhuepf Its a big part of the answer, but more specifically senior PIs need to not submit to Nature et al, and keep the manuscript as a preprint first. They are the ones that can usually afford these fees and they set the example.
@tomkXY If only it was that simple. It takes many of the senior PIs to do that first and normalize it before others can do that and still get promoted.