@Colt_Hoosier@LandonBeamon11@ChadJMiller3@Jbooty88 Fair enough. I just think coaches should be above responding to comments, positive or negative, from 23 year olds. Same nonsense that Lane engages in.
@BurnHardLang@LandonBeamon11@Jbooty88 Sure. Or your coach, if he felt like he was forced to respond at all (which he wasn’t), could’ve just said: If he thinks we were running base D the whole game, I don’t agree with that. I do agree with him that our boys were disciplined for 60 minutes and Bama couldn’t do anything
@Colt_Hoosier@LandonBeamon11@ChadJMiller3@Jbooty88 No Bama fan cares about what Ty said or whether he was wrong. We just don’t think any coach should be publicly responding to podcast Qs from former players. Of course, we also had a head coach for 17 years who didn’t let his coaches talk to the media, for this very reason
@BurnHardLang@LandonBeamon11@Jbooty88 Whether it was a base D or they were disguising the D, it’s a 20 second comment to a Q in which he then said that it didn’t matter what we did because they were so disciplined and exactly where they needed to be. All game. Take the W for your team playing perfectly
@LandonBeamon11@ChadJMiller3@Jbooty88 The issue isn’t what IU coaches said. It’s that they responded at all. Ty was asked a Q and responded. The IU staff, who weren’t asked a Q, decided to respond. IU was great. Bama couldn’t do anything. A coach feeling the need to respond to every perceived slight is mind boggling
@LandonBeamon11@BurnHardLang@Jbooty88 It’s like saying: yeah we knew exactly what 2011 Alabama was going to do offensively… line it up and run the ball. But they were so disciplined and physical, we couldn’t do anything and instead they just ran it down our throats for 60 mins. That’s a compliment to the offense.