@cautionmari_itz 3. Think ayuda is not an effective strategy as compared to general misinformation of the public, targeting those less educationally attained. I mean, extensively covered in media (see JMara's Wala) and everyone's aware of it but not too sure of the data of that.
@cautionmari_itz 1. Thank you for sharing.
2. Would be interesting to see Senatorial or House Exit Polls, as Duterte really was a special candidate. People my age (I assume) don't really understand how he won but I'm recently looking more into *why* that's the case.
@escalonamar My politics, while directionally the same (nationalistic liberal), are probably far from what you hold (i.e. I wouldn't outright call Isko a fascist, or agree that a revolution is necessary). Yet following you is 100% worth it to better educate myself, very helpful. Thanks.
@aronnoaaron Agreed!!!!!!!!!!! Not enough exclamation marks to emphasize how much I agree with this take. I seriously don't get how we get distracted over the wrong parts of things.
@rowena_guanzon It might be that instead of allocating to senior high, the resources would be better off for primary and secondary education. I think an accelerated program would be good actually, provided it is well implemented.
@escalonamar Yes! If I had my favorite President it was definitely him. Would really really like to read up more on him and the Philippines under him and FDR.
@escalonamar Good take.
The advantage of them being dynasts are that they actually learned. The only things most of the same kind learns are how to gain, leverage, and hold power.
@bridledfury too many allies and fence-sitters ngayon, di aabot aa 2/3 majority para ma-convict
better if palipasin muna election para hopefully matanggal nga Duterte allies + di alalahanin ng fence sitters yung Mindanao votes
@ndronqs@inquirerdotnet While I don't doubt Inquirer would use AI to write articles, aren't "AI detectord" wildly inaccurate and flag flase positives all the time? A reddit shows multiple anecdotes for copyleaks alone.
Having an author with initials "A.I" for the AI articles is certainly funny though.
People often claim they know when ChatGPT wrote something, but are they as accurate as they think?
Turns out that while general population is unreliable, those who frequently use ChatGPT for writing tasks can spot even "humanized" AI-generated text with near-perfect accuracy 🎯
@ndronqs@inquirerdotnet Here's two articles that tell how AI detectors aren't reliable at all.
Article specifically using Copyleaks
https://t.co/jZSRF0O1Qn
Another article from a year ago.
https://t.co/CXzASuivvz