🚨BREAKING: Reform MP Rupert Lowe ERUPTS over sharia courts operating in the uk:-
'Shariah courts operating in the UK should be shut down. If you want to live in our country, you live by our laws.
Don't like it? Leave'.
Are you with Rupert on this?
Hi lovely followers. Those that have been here a while will know how passionate I am about exposing the CMS. They kill over 1500 paying parents a year. I'm uploading a Sonia Poulton podcast with Jo & Ian in 8 small clips over the next few days. I would appreciate anyone re posting it.
It's way bigger than the post office scandal. WAY bigger. Hard working people are dropping like flies. Kids left without fathers. Please help me get this out there. I did just post part one.
Thank you ❤️ Lottie
This is Thomas Taylor, a 17-year-old White boy from England.
Last night, he was brutally stabbed to death by a black gang at a bus station in Bedford, a small town.
Why is nobody talking about this tragedy? White Lives Matter! 💔
This is Keir Starmer imploring Tory MPs to “vote for a really important bill” and reject a national inquiry.
The PM then forced a 3-line whip meaning any abstaining Labour MPs would be expelled.
Then the PM didn’t even show up to vote for his “really important bill”.
Shameful.
THE CHILD MAINTENANCE SERVICE SCANDAL!
Exposing Unjust Practices in Child Support Enforcement: The Case of Crispin Bernard Gascoigne Hayhoe
Introduction
When dealing with the Child Maintenance Service (CMS), countless parents face a lack of transparency, procedural barriers, and, often, unchallenged demands for payments they believe are incorrect. One of the key figures in this system is Crispin Bernard Gascoigne Hayhoe, a barrister representing the CMS in numerous cases involving liability orders. This article outlines the concerns about Mr. Hayhoe’s role in cases where parents were allegedly prevented from presenting crucial evidence, and where his actions may have compromised fair proceedings.
1. Who is Crispin Hayhoe?
Crispin Hayhoe is a barrister representing the CMS in proceedings where liability orders are sought against Paying Parents. In cases where parents believe CMS calculations are flawed or unsupported by evidence, Mr. Hayhoe has invoked legal provisions that prevent judicial scrutiny of the CMS’s methods, effectively denying parents the opportunity to challenge these calculations in court.
2. Use of Section 33(4) of the Child Support Act 1991
One key issue with Mr. Hayhoe’s approach is his reliance on Section 33(4) of the Child Support Act 1991. By invoking this section, he has often prevented the court from examining CMS calculations. This action effectively "shuts down" the court's ability to review evidence and verify the accuracy of arrears claims, leaving Paying Parents without any avenue to contest potentially flawed calculations. Such a practice raises serious concerns about fairness, transparency, and the misuse of legal authority.
3. Knowledge of Unjust Practices
It is alleged that Mr. Hayhoe is aware that CMS is collecting money in some cases that is not actually owed. Reports indicate that, despite being aware of CMS actions based on incorrect calculations, Mr. Hayhoe continues to enforce these claims against parents, causing significant financial and emotional distress. These actions go beyond mere representation and suggest a lack of accountability for CMS errors.
4. Breach of Fundamental Rights: Right to a Fair Hearing
By invoking Section 33(4), Mr. Hayhoe’s actions may be infringing on the right to a fair hearing, protected under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This right ensures that every person has a fair chance to present their case in court and challenge the evidence against them. Mr. Hayhoe’s tactics effectively block parents from this fundamental right, which could have severe legal and human rights implications.
5. Concerns Over Judicial Independence
Under Section 3 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, the independence of the judiciary is a cornerstone of the legal system in England and Wales. Mr. Hayhoe’s repeated invocation of Section 33(4) arguably undermines this independence, as it limits the judiciary’s ability to exercise discretion and assess evidence. In a system meant to be impartial, blocking judges from reviewing all relevant information is both troubling and potentially unlawful.
6. The Human Impact
The impact on families facing unsubstantiated arrears demands is severe. Many parents have reported overwhelming financial strain, mental health impacts, and even cases of homelessness due to excessive enforcement by CMS, reinforced by Mr. Hayhoe’s actions in court. The ability to contest CMS claims is critical, and blocking this right has left many without hope or justice.
7. Call for Accountability and Reform
This case raises serious questions about the ethics of enforcing unverified financial claims and using legal provisions to shut down fair hearings. Reform is urgently needed to ensure that all parties in child support cases are afforded due process, transparency, and the chance to present their evidence. The actions of individuals like Crispin Hayhoe should be scrutinized by regulators and lawmakers to protect the rights of parents and uphold the rule of law.
Share Your Story
If you have experienced similar issues with CMS enforcement or Mr. Hayhoe’s conduct in court, consider sharing your story. We aim to build a community of people affected by these practices, pushing for reform and holding those involved accountable.
Conclusion
This case is a stark reminder of how critical transparency and fairness are in legal proceedings, especially those impacting families and finances. By shedding light on these practices, we hope to bring about a more just and accountable system for all.
Addressing the “Deadbeat Dad” Narrative, Media Misinformation, and Legal Bias in Child Support Cases
Introduction
For years, organisations like Gingerbread and sections of the media have framed the issue of child support through the lens of “deadbeat dads” who supposedly refuse to support their children. While there are undoubtedly cases of unpaid support, this narrow perspective ignores the complex realities many Paying Parents face, including systemic issues within the Child Maintenance Service (CMS), flawed arrears calculations, and excessive enforcement measures. Even legal representatives such as Crispin Bernard Gascoigne Hayhoe reinforce this bias in court by shutting down opportunities to challenge potentially inaccurate claims. This article explores how this bias harms parents unjustly labeled as delinquent and obstructs necessary reforms in the CMS.
1. Gingerbread’s Role and the “Deadbeat Dad” Stereotype
Gingerbread, a prominent organisation supporting single parents, has been influential in shaping public perception about child maintenance. While its advocacy highlights real challenges single parents face, it also perpetuates a one-dimensional view of non-paying parents. The “deadbeat dad” narrative oversimplifies situations where parents may face inaccuracies in CMS calculations, such as inflated arrears or erroneous enforcement actions. Many parents are willing and trying to pay, yet are burdened by a system that is often inaccessible and unaccountable.
2. Misrepresentation, Media Misinformation, and Legal Bias
The media frequently mirrors Gingerbread’s stance, reinforcing this “deadbeat” stereotype without exploring the real complexities. Reports often fail to investigate cases where CMS calculations are flawed or where Paying Parents are financially overburdened due to administrative errors. Beyond the media, legal professionals like Crispin Hayhoe actively participate in this biased narrative by routinely using legal provisions that prevent Paying Parents from presenting evidence in court.
For example, Mr. Hayhoe has invoked Section 33(4) of the Child Support Act 1991 in numerous cases to prevent judges from questioning CMS arrears calculations. By shutting down the opportunity for scrutiny, Mr. Hayhoe reinforces the idea that all non-paying parents are at fault and untrustworthy. His actions not only block judicial review but also leave Paying Parents without a voice to challenge claims they know to be inaccurate.
Such actions contribute to a pervasive narrative that every parent pursued by the CMS is avoiding responsibility—an assumption that is not only incorrect but also damaging for those unjustly pursued.
3. How Bias Impacts Public Perception, Policy, and Justice
The “deadbeat dad” narrative does more than shape public opinion; it influences policy and legal practices, embedding a bias that favors enforcement over fairness. This bias extends into courtrooms where legal representatives like Mr. Hayhoe systematically shut down challenges, ensuring CMS claims remain unchallenged. Policies increasingly support aggressive enforcement rather than thorough assessment of the accuracy of arrears calculations. The result is a system where parents are routinely labeled and pursued as delinquent, even when they may be facing unwarranted financial demands.
4. The Human Cost of an Unbalanced System
The reality is that many Paying Parents facing CMS enforcement are not “deadbeat” but rather victims of a system that fails to ensure accuracy and fairness. When barristers like Crispin Hayhoe use the courts to reinforce this narrative without allowing due process, it leads to severe consequences: financial hardship, mental health struggles, and even homelessness for parents struggling to pay amounts they may not owe. The bias against Paying Parents obstructs necessary reforms and overlooks the real need for transparency, judicial review, and accountability in CMS practices.
5. Moving Towards Fairness and Accountability
To make progress, we must challenge these stereotypes and demand a fairer system that respects the rights of all parties involved. This means holding organisations, media outlets, and legal representatives accountable for the narratives they promote. Policymakers should focus on transparency, accuracy, and accountability within the CMS, and court processes must ensure that all evidence can be heard. When legal professionals like Mr. Hayhoe advocate on behalf of CMS in ways that prevent fair challenges, they compromise the rights of parents and undermine the justice system.
By exposing these issues, we hope to encourage a more balanced approach—one that acknowledges the needs of single parents without demonising those who are struggling within a flawed system.
Conclusion
The “deadbeat dad” label is a powerful narrative, but it doesn’t tell the whole story. In many cases, the parents targeted by CMS enforcement are not avoiding their responsibilities—they’re fighting an uphill battle against a system that prioritises collection over accuracy and fairness. It’s time to move past stereotypes and work toward a solution that truly serves the interests of all families, without the interference of biased legal practices that only reinforce unfair assumptions.
https://t.co/nUZN8UtufQ
@nero_returns @SoniaPoulton@GBNEWS@DWPgovuk@thebarcouncil@PermsecGLD@33BedfordRow@elonmusk@noel_willcox@CDP1882@mensrightsbunny@GBNEWS@Geri_E_L_Scott@CommonsWorkPen
An independent investigation into every council and police force in the UK is a must.
An investigation must also be done into all politicians to find out who knew and didn’t act.
They must be held to account and removed from office.
Charges must be fetched to rapists, professionals, politicians.
Support, funding, education, training, policy and law changes must be enforced.
The Child Maintenance Service SCANDAL - CHILDREN ARE LOSING PARENTS, PARENTS ARE LOSING CHILDREN due to the State Fraud - what has @UKParliament and @10DowningStreet@Conservatives done? .................NOTHING but SILENCE and STONEWALLING! R.I.P. Johnny O'Neill. The @DWP has blood on its hands and all those who have ignored this SCANDAL, the CMS has caused thousands of deaths! A suicide note was left naming the CMS as being responsible for his death, the Coroner refused to blame the CMS. @noel_willcox@jamesenglish0@elonmusk@CDP1882@mensrightsbunny@HousingRich @nero_returns @Geri_E_L_Scott@ABridgen@Cobratate
https://t.co/iYHsJeH9mb
The BBC sent a team to Great Yarmouth today to see how local voters feel I have performed in the first six months as their MP - a very fair report.
Progress made locally, but so much more to do.
It is a genuine honour to represent such a fantastic part of the country.
The Child Maintenance Service SCANDAL! @nero_returns @SoniaPoulton exposing the wrongdoing of the Child Maintenance Service and Lee Windsor's case. Lee has now been to court 5 times and not once has the court looked at his evidence. Crispin Hayhoe, the barrister for the CMS stopped the justice's from looking at Lee's evidence which proved he did not owe the arrears. The liability orders were granted for nearly £26,000. Lee has been trying to have the liability orders set aside however, the courts are not interested and the @GovernmentLegal@PermsecGLD had Lee's appeal struck-out. @SuellaBraverman is Lee's MP she did nothing to help him, this SCANDAL got worse under the 14 years of bad governance of the @Conservatives
This is a MASSIVE SCANDAL that has been ignored and stonewalled for far too long! Corruption and unaccountability flourished under the @Conservatives@UKLabour@10DowningStreet has now been in office for 6 months and still NOTHING has been done to hold this rogue department to account! @DWPgovuk
https://t.co/T4JJv1x5hV
@nero_returns @GBNEWS@noel_willcox@elonmusk@CDP1882@mensrightsbunny@Geri_E_L_Scott@ABridgen@Cobratate@jamesenglish0@Conservatives@SuellaBraverman@gabby_cabby