Olivia
Online
XRP_BJohnson
@brj1985
Joined February 2013
761 Following
117 Followers
245 Posts
Pinned Tweet
2020 Wealth strategy:
1. Hold and add to bag of $XRP
2. Swing trade other cryptos (with caution)
3. Make calls/puts on major stock market indices
4. Buy physical precious metals
5. Remember everything is preplanned
#xrp #xrpcommmunity
@endgazagenocide Do you think holding QNT is more valuable than XRP? Also, will most people be on UBI after the reset occurs?
Banking Regulators Issue a Stern Warning to Any Bank Doing Business with PayPal, Continuing An Unprecedented Financial Regulatory Onslaught Against All Things Crypto.
The Federal Reserve just issued yet another announcement relating to any bank that has anything to do with the cryptoverse, including and especially the newly minted PayPal stablecoins. https://t.co/JV4slF1Sx7
This latest Fed move puts dealings with the crypto sector under its new “novel activities supervision program” in which the Fed’s specialized experts in digital assets will work alongside the regulator’s regular supervisors.
For example, this latest Federal Reserve supervisory letter mandates that state banks that are a members of the U.S. Federal Reserve system must obtain a written supervisory nonobjection from the Fed before issuing, holding or transacting in dollar tokens used to facilitate payments, such as stablecoins, precisely the kind of stablecoins that PayPal just rolled out.
Specifically, an institution that’s “issuing, holding or transacting in dollar tokens to facilitate payments” needs to prove to Fed supervisors beforehand that it can do so in a “safe and sound manner” and needs the Fed to formally sign off.
That permission will prove challenging to obtain. Each bank must demonstrate it can "identify, measure, monitor and control the risks of its activities," and the Fed will be looking for any vulnerabilities to money laundering, customer runs and hackers, among other things.
The Fed also Plans to examine a banks’ capacity to handle “substantial redemptions in a short period of time” as well as ensuring banks have adequate systems in place to handle “cybersecurity risks, including risks associated with the network on which the dollar token is transacted [and] the use of smart contracts.”
The Fed’s new supervisory program is also designated to oversee the activities of the banks it supervises relating to blockchain technology and tech-driven nonbank partnerships, with the aim of complementing its existing supervisory process and strengthening the oversight of tech-driven activities.
The Fed said the objective of the novel activities program, which applies to both insured and uninsured U.S. banks supervised by the Board, is to balance financial innovation with appropriate risk management practices to ensure the safety and soundness of the banking system.
The new Fed program is an additional measure to the Board’s January 27, 2023 policy statement that aims to ensure all Fed-supervised banks are subject to the same crypto-related limitations.
https://t.co/Vpp0pNVc49
Other Crypto-Related Financial Regulatory Actions
The Federal Reserve is not acting alone in its crypto related pronouncements and initiatives — its traditional regulatory partners have also become equally concerned about crypto and implemented similarly aggressive crypto-regulatory proclamations.
FDIC
On April 7, 2022, the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) issued a Financial Institution Letter (“FIL”) captioned, Notification of Engaging in Crypto-Related Activities relating to behaviors of FDIC-supervised financial institutions. https://t.co/2wWPINjOrZ
The FIL discusses a litany of crypto-related risks that have triggered material FDIC concerns, including safety and soundness; financial stability dangers; consumer protection issues; ownership questions; money laundering problems; cybersecurity weaknesses; credit fears; and more.
The FDIC notes that FDIC-supervised institutions “should be able to demonstrate their ability to conduct crypto-related activities in a safe and sound manner,” pursuant to Section 39 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (https://t.co/RYKVxXppqd) and the FDIC’s Part 364 Standards for Safety and Soundness. https://t.co/3fblKKt75p
Along those lines, the FIL requires all FDIC-supervised institutions to notify the FDIC prior to engaging in a crypto-related activity.
Notification of the FDIC appears to be just the beginning. The FDIC will follow-up all submissions and seek “information necessary to allow the agency to assess the safety and soundness, consumer protection, and financial stability implications of such activities," and, as appropriate, will provide “relevant supervisory feedback . . . in a timely manner.” The FDIC also encourages firms to notify their state regulators of all crypto-related activities.
Whether FDIC concerns could result in a regulatory prohibition on bank involvement in certain crypto-related activities remains unclear. However, the FIL is obviously a forerunner of increased FDIC engagement into all levels of bank-related crypto-activity.
OCC
On November 18, 2021, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Interpretive Letter #1179 (https://t.co/Jn10aTcnb8),its fourth interpretive letter regarding whether it is permissible for national banks and federal savings associations to engage in certain cryptocurrency, distributed ledger and stablecoin activities. https://t.co/jIxtKp0mKu
The first letter, Interpretive Letter 1170 concluded that banks may provide certain cryptocurrency custody services on behalf of customers. https://t.co/qo5Lu51Cw3. The second letter, OCC Interpretive Letter 1172, concluded that banks may hold deposits that serve as reserves for stablecoins that are backed on a 1:1 basis by a single fiat currency and held in hosted wallets. https://t.co/qo5Lu51Cw3. The third letter, OCC Interpretive Letter 1174, concluded that banks may use distributed ledgers and stablecoins to engage in and facilitate payment activities. https://t.co/EiAVj1S6QX These three previous letters indicated that banks conducting crypto-related activities must abide by safe and sound banking practices. https://t.co/MEVP7sSNCO.
N.B. that banks that are not regulated by the OCC should also consider reading the OCC Letter as if it were issued by the Federal Reserve or the FDIC. State banks generally may engage only in activities that are permissible for a national bank, and bank participation in crypto-related activities is no different in this regard. https://t.co/ojClG2pOlW.
OCC Letter No. 1179 notes that national banks and federal savings associations must demonstrate to the OCC that they have adequate controls in place prior to engaging in cryptocurrency activities. Specifically, OCC Letter No. 1179 clarifies that all crypto-related activities may only be conducted after a bank both notifies its supervisory office of its intent to engage in such activities, and receives written notification of the supervisory office’s non-objection of such activities.
In order to receive a grant of “non-objection,” a bank must demonstrate that they have adequate controls in place before they engage in any of the following:
— Providing custody services for crypto-assets;
— Holding dollar deposits serving as reserves backing stablecoins;
— Acting as nodes on DLT networks to verify customer payments; and
— Engaging in certain stablecoin activities to facilitate payment transactions on DLT.
OCC not only evaluates the adequacy of the bank’s risk management systems, controls and threat measurement systems but OCC has apparently begun a new examination program to continue to review crypto-related activities as part of its ordinary oversight responsibilities.
In deciding whether to grant supervisory “non-objection,” to a crypto-activity, the OCC supervisory office will evaluate the adequacy of a bank’s crypto-related risk measurement and management information systems including compliance obligations (such as AML and consumer protections); risk mitigations and risk-related practices, policies and procedures; and a litany of other concerns relating to cybersecurity, theft, liquidity and other hazards.
Given the lack of regulatory oversight over the entire crypto (and Web3) marketplace, proving to OCC that a financial firm is conducting its crypto-related activities in a “safe and sound” manner is a challenging undertaking.
Hence, OCC Letter No. 1179’s “pre-clearance obligation” is not merely a far-reaching and stark reminder of OCC crypto-related concerns. OCC Letter No. 1179 is also a definitive resetting of higher OCC expectations, and perhaps even a harbinger of an OCC plan to strictly limit crypto-related activities by national banks.
Looking Ahead
Big Crypto triumphantly heralded President Biden’s March 9, 2022, Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets, praising the order as a critical and bold step forward for digital assets and all of Web3. https://t.co/HRqTAJLT8T
But the actions of the Fed, FDIC and OCC since the Biden EO have been precisely to the contrary — and are far from deserving of any crypto-related celebration.
For fintech professionals in particular, take heed. U.S. Banking regulators like the Fed, FDIC and OCC have officially kick-started a range of burdensome, weighty and powerful regulatory initiatives pertaining to digital assets, and crypto is not their only target.
In addition, financial regulators have also begun to set their sights on:
— So-called (yet not really) decentralized finance (see, e.g. the U.S. SEC enforcement actions against Coinbase, Bittrex, Binance, Beaxy, Gemini and others);
— Spurious and ethereal non-fungible tokens (pun intended) (see, e.g. a litany of U.S. DOJ NFT-related prosecutions at: https://t.co/KvKG4sUcJ5); and
— Other purportedly game-changing (yet too often menacing and destructive) Web3 variants (see, e.g. https://t.co/IYnTRIlDuV)
Make no mistake about it, the cryptoverse is currently operating amid an unprecedented U.S. crypto-regulatory firestorm that continues to swell exponentially - where U.S. regulatory wrath can occur anytime, anywhere.
Fail not at your peril crypto-customers.
![JohnReedStark's tweet photo. Banking Regulators Issue a Stern Warning to Any Bank Doing Business with PayPal, Continuing An Unprecedented Financial Regulatory Onslaught Against All Things Crypto.
The Federal Reserve just issued yet another announcement relating to any bank that has anything to do with the cryptoverse, including and especially the newly minted PayPal stablecoins. https://t.co/JV4slF1Sx7
This latest Fed move puts dealings with the crypto sector under its new “novel activities supervision program” in which the Fed’s specialized experts in digital assets will work alongside the regulator’s regular supervisors.
For example, this latest Federal Reserve supervisory letter mandates that state banks that are a members of the U.S. Federal Reserve system must obtain a written supervisory nonobjection from the Fed before issuing, holding or transacting in dollar tokens used to facilitate payments, such as stablecoins, precisely the kind of stablecoins that PayPal just rolled out.
Specifically, an institution that’s “issuing, holding or transacting in dollar tokens to facilitate payments” needs to prove to Fed supervisors beforehand that it can do so in a “safe and sound manner” and needs the Fed to formally sign off.
That permission will prove challenging to obtain. Each bank must demonstrate it can "identify, measure, monitor and control the risks of its activities," and the Fed will be looking for any vulnerabilities to money laundering, customer runs and hackers, among other things.
The Fed also Plans to examine a banks’ capacity to handle “substantial redemptions in a short period of time” as well as ensuring banks have adequate systems in place to handle “cybersecurity risks, including risks associated with the network on which the dollar token is transacted [and] the use of smart contracts.”
The Fed’s new supervisory program is also designated to oversee the activities of the banks it supervises relating to blockchain technology and tech-driven nonbank partnerships, with the aim of complementing its existing supervisory process and strengthening the oversight of tech-driven activities.
The Fed said the objective of the novel activities program, which applies to both insured and uninsured U.S. banks supervised by the Board, is to balance financial innovation with appropriate risk management practices to ensure the safety and soundness of the banking system.
The new Fed program is an additional measure to the Board’s January 27, 2023 policy statement that aims to ensure all Fed-supervised banks are subject to the same crypto-related limitations.
https://t.co/Vpp0pNVc49
Other Crypto-Related Financial Regulatory Actions
The Federal Reserve is not acting alone in its crypto related pronouncements and initiatives — its traditional regulatory partners have also become equally concerned about crypto and implemented similarly aggressive crypto-regulatory proclamations.
FDIC
On April 7, 2022, the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) issued a Financial Institution Letter (“FIL”) captioned, Notification of Engaging in Crypto-Related Activities relating to behaviors of FDIC-supervised financial institutions. https://t.co/2wWPINjOrZ
The FIL discusses a litany of crypto-related risks that have triggered material FDIC concerns, including safety and soundness; financial stability dangers; consumer protection issues; ownership questions; money laundering problems; cybersecurity weaknesses; credit fears; and more.
The FDIC notes that FDIC-supervised institutions “should be able to demonstrate their ability to conduct crypto-related activities in a safe and sound manner,” pursuant to Section 39 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (https://t.co/RYKVxXppqd) and the FDIC’s Part 364 Standards for Safety and Soundness. https://t.co/3fblKKt75p
Along those lines, the FIL requires all FDIC-supervised institutions to notify the FDIC prior to engaging in a crypto-related activity.
Notification of the FDIC appears to be just the beginning. The FDIC will follow-up all submissions and seek “information necessary to allow the agency to assess the safety and soundness, consumer protection, and financial stability implications of such activities," and, as appropriate, will provide “relevant supervisory feedback . . . in a timely manner.” The FDIC also encourages firms to notify their state regulators of all crypto-related activities.
Whether FDIC concerns could result in a regulatory prohibition on bank involvement in certain crypto-related activities remains unclear. However, the FIL is obviously a forerunner of increased FDIC engagement into all levels of bank-related crypto-activity.
OCC
On November 18, 2021, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Interpretive Letter #1179 (https://t.co/Jn10aTcnb8),its fourth interpretive letter regarding whether it is permissible for national banks and federal savings associations to engage in certain cryptocurrency, distributed ledger and stablecoin activities. https://t.co/jIxtKp0mKu
The first letter, Interpretive Letter 1170 concluded that banks may provide certain cryptocurrency custody services on behalf of customers. https://t.co/qo5Lu51Cw3. The second letter, OCC Interpretive Letter 1172, concluded that banks may hold deposits that serve as reserves for stablecoins that are backed on a 1:1 basis by a single fiat currency and held in hosted wallets. https://t.co/qo5Lu51Cw3. The third letter, OCC Interpretive Letter 1174, concluded that banks may use distributed ledgers and stablecoins to engage in and facilitate payment activities. https://t.co/EiAVj1S6QX These three previous letters indicated that banks conducting crypto-related activities must abide by safe and sound banking practices. https://t.co/MEVP7sSNCO.
N.B. that banks that are not regulated by the OCC should also consider reading the OCC Letter as if it were issued by the Federal Reserve or the FDIC. State banks generally may engage only in activities that are permissible for a national bank, and bank participation in crypto-related activities is no different in this regard. https://t.co/ojClG2pOlW.
OCC Letter No. 1179 notes that national banks and federal savings associations must demonstrate to the OCC that they have adequate controls in place prior to engaging in cryptocurrency activities. Specifically, OCC Letter No. 1179 clarifies that all crypto-related activities may only be conducted after a bank both notifies its supervisory office of its intent to engage in such activities, and receives written notification of the supervisory office’s non-objection of such activities.
In order to receive a grant of “non-objection,” a bank must demonstrate that they have adequate controls in place before they engage in any of the following:
— Providing custody services for crypto-assets;
— Holding dollar deposits serving as reserves backing stablecoins;
— Acting as nodes on DLT networks to verify customer payments; and
— Engaging in certain stablecoin activities to facilitate payment transactions on DLT.
OCC not only evaluates the adequacy of the bank’s risk management systems, controls and threat measurement systems but OCC has apparently begun a new examination program to continue to review crypto-related activities as part of its ordinary oversight responsibilities.
In deciding whether to grant supervisory “non-objection,” to a crypto-activity, the OCC supervisory office will evaluate the adequacy of a bank’s crypto-related risk measurement and management information systems including compliance obligations (such as AML and consumer protections); risk mitigations and risk-related practices, policies and procedures; and a litany of other concerns relating to cybersecurity, theft, liquidity and other hazards.
Given the lack of regulatory oversight over the entire crypto (and Web3) marketplace, proving to OCC that a financial firm is conducting its crypto-related activities in a “safe and sound” manner is a challenging undertaking.
Hence, OCC Letter No. 1179’s “pre-clearance obligation” is not merely a far-reaching and stark reminder of OCC crypto-related concerns. OCC Letter No. 1179 is also a definitive resetting of higher OCC expectations, and perhaps even a harbinger of an OCC plan to strictly limit crypto-related activities by national banks.
Looking Ahead
Big Crypto triumphantly heralded President Biden’s March 9, 2022, Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets, praising the order as a critical and bold step forward for digital assets and all of Web3. https://t.co/HRqTAJLT8T
But the actions of the Fed, FDIC and OCC since the Biden EO have been precisely to the contrary — and are far from deserving of any crypto-related celebration.
For fintech professionals in particular, take heed. U.S. Banking regulators like the Fed, FDIC and OCC have officially kick-started a range of burdensome, weighty and powerful regulatory initiatives pertaining to digital assets, and crypto is not their only target.
In addition, financial regulators have also begun to set their sights on:
— So-called (yet not really) decentralized finance (see, e.g. the U.S. SEC enforcement actions against Coinbase, Bittrex, Binance, Beaxy, Gemini and others);
— Spurious and ethereal non-fungible tokens (pun intended) (see, e.g. a litany of U.S. DOJ NFT-related prosecutions at: https://t.co/KvKG4sUcJ5); and
— Other purportedly game-changing (yet too often menacing and destructive) Web3 variants (see, e.g. https://t.co/IYnTRIlDuV)
Make no mistake about it, the cryptoverse is currently operating amid an unprecedented U.S. crypto-regulatory firestorm that continues to swell exponentially - where U.S. regulatory wrath can occur anytime, anywhere.
Fail not at your peril crypto-customers.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F3KpfUoXcAAzh_g.jpg)
Atlanta Feds talk xrp🚀 @ExtraVOD_ @WolFMessing_11 @BabaCugs
https://t.co/Sdl02IH72L
#XRPArmy #xrpthestandard
@bgarlinghouse Let's go Brad!
JUST IN: US Treasury has delivered a framework to President Biden on international crypto regulation
@FlareNetworks Awesome news. Time for that passive income 💪🏾
Successful audit. Launch details end of next week. Onwards! #Flare
If you don't 👀 by now then...🤷🏾♂️
https://t.co/ShBACC3hVq
@FilthyrichMami Ledger is solid imo
@Danon4321 Same boat here. Hang in there.. everything unfolding right now. Great rewards ahead. Stay vigilant and keep building. #Yahbless 💪🏾
@C_M_101 Watch gold and silver
@PtimeXr @HammerToe @GVOCollective @HaraldoXRP @Starlink1980 The report can be used to argue both sides but it's mainly in favor of the vax, if you read it. However, articles like the one below are more troubling if the vax spike proteins are not localized. Also, this riddler (image) has been right thus far.
https://t.co/oekTk0uLhm
@crypt0_prophet @KrHnBnb @BabaCugs Guess that timeline didn't account for the SCOTUS ruling today and Mr Pool. 😁 #Riddlersaretenstepsahead
BREAKING: The American Bankers Association (@ABABankers) has confirmed to the @federalreserve on Monday that it supports a plan to migrate to #ISO20022 on a single day but said it has "serious concern" regarding the lack of detail about the plan.
https://t.co/dkTBfIq2rC
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.1M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
108.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.3M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.6M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.8M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.6M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.4M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.4M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.1M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
59.9M followers