{funspotr} -- #rstats function spotter -- is now compatible with quarto documents and is available on CRAN.
Rstudio conf 2022 pres: https://t.co/co42z34sRz
package on github: https://t.co/GEeOFz2dy0
The drumbeat for months, from Seattle school officials and outside experts, is that enrollment is going to drop so school closures are needed. But then it didn't. https://t.co/1JS5eMvSUt
@cruickshank (I don't have strong feelings on the debate but had been planning on pulling together data and doing some analysis for my own interest but hadn't gotten around to it. I've been following you and @exante_me on this topic and thought you might find these couple notes of interest.)
@cruickshank A couple notes: https://t.co/amAEhE0R3Z
1. SPS projected drops of enrollment of 576 students --based on fall enrollment the drop may be just 27 students (w/ K actually growing)
2. The "right size student count" for schools used may have made "% capacity" seem lower
Reading "Everything is Predictable," is interesting how some of the origins of probability came about by identifying "fair" ways to split a gambling pot part way through a game. Could be interesting to calculate in the context of a game of pick-up... applying pascals' triangle
1s and 2s full court is a scourge that must be defeated but if you think you "get it" yet are playing make-it-take-it by 2s and 3s, you are missing something.
https://t.co/0PZVQRioje
Gave a lightning talk at @cascadiarconf on how prediction intervals are helpful both in informing intermediary agents and in setting the bounds within which you want those agents to operate : https://t.co/PR9kV85nj5 #rstats
#rstats#sportsanalytics post on expected values under different possession and scoring systems in pickup basketball. One takeaway is that, once you leave "balanced" FG % conditions, shooting incentives in make-it-take-it can get out-of-whack pretty quickly.
1s and 2s full court is a scourge that must be defeated but if you think you "get it" yet are playing make-it-take-it by 2s and 3s, you are missing something.
https://t.co/0PZVQRioje
1s and 2s full court is a scourge that must be defeated but if you think you "get it" yet are playing make-it-take-it by 2s and 3s, you are missing something.
https://t.co/0PZVQRioje
However 2s and 3s isn't always better. If you're playing "make-it-take-it"--where scoring comes with retaining possession--expected points are not just {expected points of shot} but also {expected points of future shots you may get if you score and therefore retain possession}.
When I play pickup basketball I like to go by 2s and 3s because it gives more similar expected values to a wider range of shots compared to the more commonly played 1s and 2s (where taking long range shots often becomes the dominant strategy).
Inconsistent rules are like plot holes in a movie, you get pulled out of the experience... and then, what's the point? Why play? (... yeah, yeah, time with friends / family, blah blah blah...). If I have a say in the rules, I like to choose rules that make for a balanced game.
I don't like the phrase "it's just a game." Yes, the stakes may be low but the zest of life comes from *getting into it.* I tend to be a stickler on rules because rules facilitate balanced games. I'm fine with house rules but be consistent.