ESTA TRADER CHINA USÓ CLAUDE FABLE 5.1 PARA MONTAR UN BOT DE TRADING
Y grabó este tutorial completo donde muestra cómo replicarlo desde 0
31 minutos. Paso a paso. Gratis.
Subtitulado al español e inglés.
Guárdalo, ya me lo agradecerás 🔖
ESTE SITIO WEB ES UNA LOCURA
Contiene una colección enorme de herramientas open-source en el navegador que no requieren registro para usarlas.
Incluye herramientas en múltiples categorías:
→ Diseño y Gráficos
→ Desarrollo
→ Productividad
→ Privacidad y Seguridad
→ IA
→ Educación
Sin cuentas. Sin registros. Solo abre tu navegador y empieza a usarlas
Sígueme para más insights increíbles sobre IA, Coding y Desarrollo Web
LP farming on Polymarket for small accounts
this one brings me $1500 a month
the first order in it cost $45
you do it by hand, with regular limit orders, in a minute of your time.
the first payout lands the same night.
how it works:
1 - you find a market where one side sits above 95 cents and the other under 5.
every market like that has a band around the midpoint - usually a couple of cents each way. an order inside the band counts toward rewards, an order past the edge is useless.
the numbers are different on every market, so look them up before you start farming LP rewards.
2 - you buy the cheap side with a limit order. say 1000 shares at 4.5 cents - that's $45.
the shares you just bought go straight back up for sale, a little above the midpoint.
that's your first leg.
3 - you put a bid a little under the midpoint.
that's your second leg.
if you have $45 of shares sitting on the sell side and nothing on the buy side, the smaller of the two is zero. and the entire day scores as zero, never mind that a $45 limit order was there. those are Polymarket's rules, and that's why one leg alone gets you nowhere here.
4 - once a day you check where the midpoint moved and drag both legs after it.
the midpoint drifts on its own. an order left near the edge of the band still sits in the book but earns pennies - at half the allowed distance it counts for a quarter.
a market with a live pool pays around $3.5 a day for every $100 you have working.
on $1400 of working capital that's about $49 a day in rewards.
almost 50% of cheap markets pay nothing at all - their daily pool is under a dollar.
pick your markets by pool size. on a random cheap market you most often get nothing.
give this post to your grok bot - let it walk you through the steps for your own bankroll.
after that it's picking a market with a live pool and putting up two legs.
ESTE TRADER CONVIRTIÓ UN BOT DE GROK EN UN EQUIPO DE TRADING CON IA 24/7.
6 AGENTES MONITORIZAN EL MERCADO, ANALIZAN OPERACIONES, GESTIONAN EL RIESGO Y EJECUTAN ÓRDENES MIENTRAS ÉL DUERME.
Alguien le dio $75 a Grok Bot y le dijo:
“Gánate lo tuyo o te apago”.
48 horas después, la cuenta estaba en $6,140.
Y todavía sigue funcionando.
Es un agente de trading autónomo dentro de la plataforma.
Esta persona no tocó una sola línea de código. El bot vive en su propio entorno en la nube, con su propio navegador y terminal, trabajando incluso mientras duerme.
Cada 20 minutos hace esto:
Busca todos los mercados relacionados con el clima cuya fecha de resolución esté dentro de los próximos 10 días.
Compara el precio actual del mercado con la actualización más reciente del pronóstico.
Solo abre una posición cuando el pronóstico y el mercado difieren lo suficiente como para que exista una oportunidad.
Aumenta el tamaño de la posición dependiendo de qué tan grande sea esa diferencia.
Ejecuta la operación por sí solo, sin pedir aprobación.
Y paga su propio hosting directamente con las ganancias.
Si alguna vez llega a $0, se cancela la suscripción y se acabó para siempre.
En la novena hora había caído hasta $14.
Entonces cerró todos los mercados de varios días que tenía abiertos y cambió su estrategia para operar únicamente mercados que se resolvieran el mismo día.
En otras palabras, cambió su propia estrategia para mantenerse con vida.
Configurarlo tomó una sola noche: iniciar el bot, ejecutar una operación delante de él, ponerlo en un temporizador y conectarle una wallet.
Sin VPS. Sin API keys. Sin un desarrollador pendiente.
Esta misma persona había pagado $4,000 a un freelancer el año pasado para construir algo parecido.
Nunca pasó de ser una demo.
Grok Bot hizo en una noche lo que dos meses de freelancers no pudieron hacer.
$75 → $6,140 en 48 horas.
¿Cuánto tendrá para el sábado ?
Very profitable strategy for 5-min BTC markets with new TWAP on @Polymarket
And the idea is actually simple
You don’t even need to be a professional trader
The main thing is to understand the current bias and trend
For example:
> BTC is moving down
> The trend is clear
> And there are no strong signs of reversal
Instead of trying to catch every 5-minute candle manually
You can buy the next 10 BTC Up/Down markets in the same direction with equal size
If the trend continues, you don’t need to win every market
Even 6 wins out of 10 can already be profitable
And the best part you don’t need to stare at the chart every second
Just find the trend a buy the shares
I’ll be testing this strategy closely
UN TRADER DE POLYMARKET GANÓ $53.000 USANDO DATOS METEOROLÓGICOS GRATUITOS DE LA NASA.
Monitoriza NOAA, AccuWeather y Open-Meteo al mismo tiempo.
Compra NO a 99,9 centavos y cambia a YES cuando las tres APIs coinciden.
Los datos son gratis. Las APIs son gratis.
Nadie más estaba mirando.
You can copy my entire AI trading system for $20/mo.
1. TradingView = $0
Free plan lets you trade with 2 live bots.
2. https://t.co/K0aSTn63jR = $0
797,000 tested strategies you can use.
3. https://t.co/gCY0tzYsUC = $0
To connect strategies to your exchange.
4. Claude subscription: $20/mo
Use Claude Code to build and backtest strategies.
No coding experience needed.
I personally have the premium version of everything but you don't need it to start.
Trading used to cost a fortune to automate.
Now it costs a coffee a week.
This trader made +$177,981 on Polymarket with his HFT algorithm, with an average trade of $28
His bot makes around 150 trades per hour, or 2.5 trades per minute. It trades BTC, ETH, and SOL Up/Down markets, constantly comparing its own fair probability with the price on Polymarket
Its strategy:
1. Buys the side where its model sees an edge
2. Continues increasing the position as the price moves, until the mispricing fully disappears
3. When the signal reverses, it buys the opposite outcome and turns part of the inventory into a dynamic hedge
His nickname: std0
Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this bot:
https://t.co/cnd7nrxGXR
Stats:
> Total Deposit: $3.7K
> Win Rate: 52%
> PnL: +$178k
Using this strategy and high-quality execution, he captures a micro edge and repeats it thousands of times
That’s how he reached a 4,810% ROI in 5 months of trading
this weather bot just made nearly $10K on polymarket in a week
the trader has made $9,933 in the past 7 days from weather markets alone
the strategy is simple:
→ trades temperature markets across major cities
→ buys YES/NO contracts at mispriced levels
→ takes positions before the market fully adjusts
→repeatedly captures 50%–500%+ returns
some recent wins:
→ $3,825 → $7,081 (+571%)
→ $814 → $2,889 (+255%)
→ $66 → $452 (+581%)
→ $135 → $205 (+110%)
only 150 predictions but already nearly $10K in weekly profit
MY $39K PNL BOT RUNS WITH JUST ONE RULE
People think sweeper bots are complex.
Mine runs on a single question, asked hundreds of times a day.
Here's the whole brain of it:
The question is this.
Is a reversal realistically possible right now, or not?
That's it.
Everything else is just plumbing around that one check.
> Reversal still possible? The bot does nothing.
> Reversal effectively impossible and the share's under $1? It buys.
No indicators. No model's mood. No prediction.
Just a clean yes-or-no on whether the outcome's already locked.
And that's the whole point of a sweeper.
You're not forecasting anything.
You're reading a fact, has the outcome been decided or not, and acting only when the answer is yes.
Simple beats complex here every time.
A bot with one clear rule is fast, debuggable, and it doesn't second-guess itself.
Proof it works, $39k: <https://t.co/yCsjRsOAXJ>
Stop stacking ten signals.
Find the one fact worth firing on and build around that.
Next post i break down the exact threshold that answers "is a reversal possible."
That's the core, so don't miss it.
a drunk guy at a bar showed me his Polymarket account. He's made $131,000 since April 2026.
then he told me about the edge he runs and asked me to never tell anyone about it.
he didn't come up with any of it. he brought it from work. funds have been running this for years, and most of the accounts with fat PnL you see out there come from the same place.
a 5 minute market has two sides, UP and DOWN. at the end one of them becomes a dollar and the other one becomes zero. so 1 UP + 1 DOWN = $1.
but you can buy 1 UP at 0.48, wait for the price to move, and buy 1 DOWN at say 0.49. you just built one pair for 0.97.
the moment the pair is complete it merges back into $1 and you keep 0.03, without waiting for the market to end.
you can't buy it like that from the order book though. both sides at market go for around $1.01 together.
so you put in limit orders and wait for people to sell you UP and DOWN at your prices.
on his profile there are 301 buys in 225 seconds and 16 merges, all inside one five minute market.
he also gets paid separately for keeping his orders sitting in the book, around $70,000 on top of everything else.
this isn't free money though.
sometimes only one side fills. He bought UP, the price ran away, and nobody is selling him DOWN at the price he needs anymore. the pair never comes together and he's stuck holding a naked trade he never wanted.
those leftovers ate $158,000 of his money.
the paired part made $288,000 over the same stretch.
the $131,000 on his account is the difference between those two numbers.
i asked him why nobody has eaten this up yet.
he said three cents don't interest anyone. to turn them into money you have to sit in the order book around the clock and move your orders faster than the price does. hobody has the patience for it.
he looked at his watch and said he had to go.
then he added that I could run the same thing myself and make the same money.
we shook hands and he left. I stayed with my beer, thinking about what he told me.
he never told me his name and I never asked.
all I have left from that night is his profile:
https://t.co/nracaVvDbn
A six-bot Grok Bot content team with a Chief of Staff routing every task can handle research, writing, design, analytics, scheduling and publishing without a human in the middle.
→ Every agent gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system with shared memory
→ Research is already inside the draft before the draft starts, no copy-pasting between tools
→ Teach an agent a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it once
→ The real shift is deleting the 40 steps between the idea and the post
This wallet turned 33,770 predictions into $80,274 on Polymarket. Same 5-minute BTC window, every single time
Profile: https://t.co/L9P8UyOkYF
Watch how the stake moves with the price:
$597 in at 25.1¢ → $2,375.80 out (+297.76%)
$535 in at 26.5¢ → $2,020.83 out (+277.47%)
$1,864 in at 53.6¢ → $3,477.09 out (+86.45%)
$2,150 in at 47.2¢ → $4,554.19 out (+111.76%)
The pattern:
stake size scales up as price approaches 50¢, and down as price moves toward the extremes
That's inverse-variance sizing. Near 50¢, outcome uncertainty is highest, edge per dollar is thin, so it compensates with volume
Near 25¢ or 75¢, the market has already partially resolved. Edge per dollar is fat, so a small stake captures most of the asymmetry
It's the same logic behind Kelly-adjacent position sizing, just applied to 5-minute prediction windows instead of a portfolio
33,770 repetitions of the same rule isn't a gut call. It's a sizing function running on autopilot, never once breaking discipline
That kind of rule isn't hard to build anymore. You describe the logic in plain English, an AI turns it into working strategy code, and you test it against years of real data before it ever touches real money
Wrote the full breakdown of that entire cycle
idea → rules → backtest → live, and ran it against two of the most cited papers in quant finance to prove it's not just talk. Article below