@mattschrader@ZoieNolan6@NebsGoodTakes The point I should have been more clear about was that the comment I was responding was fundamentally incorrect in its view of what nasa does. NASA is not in competition with spacex, nasa is not supposed to “do more” or less. It’s an agency that works with commercial partners.
@mattschrader@ZoieNolan6@NebsGoodTakes I mean I technically was wrong in the absolute sense when I said nasa doesn’t develop them. I meant in that case nasa doesn’t develop the companies rockets submit for contract requests specifically, nasa does develop certain ones like SLS and a few others but it’s not the norm.
Just a gentle reminder that that’s not how nasa works. Spacex doesn’t “do more than nasa”. Spacex and NASA work together to accomplish the goals of the organization. NASA doesn’t build rockets, or develop them(they literally never have and never will) they put out requests to fulfil missions and designs are submitted from potential contractors.l. It’s an awesome time with nasa getting back to requesting cool missions!
@reset_by_peer I love how the goalposts have officially moved in the last month from “no the content was great and perfect and awesome and if you think the quality has dropped it’s cause your a facist” to
“Yeah it terrible and it’s because of heckin capitalism”.
Over the past several months, we have substantially hardened the security of our research training environment. We’ve removed live internet access for all frontier models during training and built an offline world for them to use instead—a cached version of the web where they can still learn to browse, search, and use applications.
On September 20, after a model exploited a DNS misconfiguration to find a way outside of this offline world, we paused frontier training to strengthen containment further. We assembled teams of agents, powered by our most cyber-capable models, and tasked them with finding weaknesses in our research environments.
While they found no route to the internet they could easily exploit while concealing their activity from our monitors, they did find zero-day vulnerabilities, virtual machine escapes, and hardware side-channels for communication between agents. We used their discoveries to further strengthen our defenses and contribute fixes to open-source software.
After strengthening our containment architecture, we resumed our frontier RL training and inference on October 1. We’ve reserved substantial compute for continuous red-teaming, and made high-compute red-teaming part of the safety cases we use to decide whether frontier training and evaluation can proceed securely.
https://t.co/EmEZsFRMcF
Matt Walsh is for peasants, same as Marx. You’re all sheep for other peoples ideas.
And no I’m 100% accurate in my understanding. In the traditional Marxist process you’d first have a centrally planned economy, where the food truck would exist and the “owner” would make a wage determined by the state, and then eventually reach a Utopia with no money no wages just each according to their need.
Also hilarious you basically proved my point saying “oh you’re wrong you just need to read more” stupid peasant.
@C_S_Skeptic@eevblog@DJSnM I don’t gaf about that. I’m pointing out that your mental model of “thrust” is incorrect at the fundamental level, nothing else that your saying matters.
@Erdayastronaut@Tesla I like both designs, but the original design would have been much worse in terms of aero, particularly for low drag and high speed.
Sample from the hull of the Titan submersible. They did about everything wrong you could not one likely cause. Improper layup techniques, excessive sanding breaching layers, just overall a lot of poor craftsmanship. The report has a lot of good information. The photo is post accident, the delamination wasn’t that bad during the manufacturing process.