Coming from the guy who is running the show behind the scenes at Strategy,
and considering STRC did 700MM of volume today.
I can safely say Charlie knows more about the change underway other than @saylor and @phongle
Morgan fucking Stanley just applied to custody bitcoin and you’re bearish.
$STRC IS >$100 and $MSTR mNAV is growing and you’re bearish.
Coinbase premium flipped green and ETF inflows flipped positive and you’re bearish.
ISM is ripping and you’re bearish.
Jesus Christ. Retail is fucking retarded.
Imagine selling right now.
If my money can disappear and I topple over and spiral. Then I am not truly wealthy in the things that really matter in life.
Remember this my future self.
Your identity will get rocked if you place it into material possessions.
🚨 A 500ft tall onshore wind turbine will NEVER produce more energy than what was required to initially produce it 🚨
A single wind turbine, like the 500ft-tall ones towering the skies throughout the Midwest, contains:
4,500,000lbs (2M kg) of concrete
1,800,000lbs (820k kg) of steel
90,000lbs (40k kg) of fiberglass
30,00lbs of epoxy resin
All of that material requires,
135,000lbs of petroleum
1,350,000lbs of coal.
1,000lbs of coal = ~10MWh’s of electricity,so 13,500MWh’s of coal-electricity-potential.
135k pounds of petroleum is = 757,800 kWh
(~300 pounds per barrel (7.21 lb/gallon × 42 gallons) ~19,151 BTU/lb. Since 1 kWh = 3,412 BTU, that’s ~5.613 kWh/lb. For 135,000 lb?135,000 × 5.613 = ~757,800kWh’s)
So over 14GWh’s of input, or the first 2,800 hours of wind turbine operating at full potential.
Onshore turbines run 10-22% of time, so call it 16%, so it’ll take 18,000hrs before it produces the amount of opportunity power cost, so first 2.5yrs pays back nothing but the raw material energy input… not even the petroleum used in transportation or maintenance.
⭐️ ⭐️ This Doesn’t take into account the energy cost of putting together raw materials and actual manufacturing of turbine. This is JUST energy cost OF the raw materials.
So incredibly inefficient it’s laughable.