@TheBritishIntel As per @grok “No, the claim as stated is not entirely accurate—it’s a sensationalized and partially misleading headline from certain UK tabloid-style outlets (like the Daily Express and GB News) that combines two separate elements from Vladimir Putin’s recent speech.” 🎤
Steven Spielberg says the aliens in Disclosure Day were partially based on witness accounts from the 1994 Ariel School sighting in Zimbabwe
“I had to base our aliens on what people have reported who claim to have had close encounters to the third kind. And there is a consistency in the reporting.
There is circumstantial evidence from tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of people who have claimed not just in America but all over the world to have seen something or met people who have seen things.
And obviously the first thing that comes to mind when you go back and you investigate what Dr. Mack, you know, investigated himself, from Harvard. He went to Zimbabwe to the aerial school where 65 school children saw a craft land and saw beings come out of that craft and they all described the eyes that were completely hypnotic and the eyes were wraparound eyes.”
🚨Before David Grusch dropped bombshells that he saw crash-retrieval photos of recovered vehicles, Col. Philip J. Corso claimed he had seen evidence from Roswell, including non-human bodies and recovered technology.
Different eras. Similar story.
Grusch on Fox News said he was given access to crash-retrieval photos and saw recovered vehicles, calling it one of the most earth-shattering things that changed his worldview.
Grusch says he thinks a press conference he was part of earlier last week helped push the issue forward.
He says the administration’s release of files is a good sign.
He also says American political advisor Stephen Miller is serious about getting to the bottom of the issue for the president.
According to Grusch, Trump had already been briefed on many of these matters during his first term.
But Grusch says not all cases fit normal explanations.
He says he has seen unusual videos showing objects like orbs that were cooler than the background temperature and moving at about 400 knots.
He presents that as an example of something that did not look ordinary to him.
He then makes a much bigger claim.
He says that, as he mentioned in a press conference earlier that week, he had access to crash-retrieval photos.
He says he saw photos of recovered vehicles. He says this was the most shocking thing he saw and that it changed his worldview years ago.
He says he hopes, and thinks, that the administration will release this kind of information in a later file release.
Corso said he saw the alien body in 1947, but he first publicly made that claim in 1997. He claimed parts of the recovered technology were secretly passed to U.S. defense contractors and helped inspire fiber optics, night vision, integrated circuits, lasers, and other advanced tech.
He also claimed the Roswell beings were not normal “aliens” as people imagine them, but engineered biological entities — almost like bio-robots or cloned worker bodies designed for space travel.
Grusch says he saw recovered vehicles. Corso said he saw the body and helped move the technology.
What do you think? Full disclosure coming? 👽
🛸 July, 1947 a UFO crashed outside Roswell: Major Jesse Marcel was the first Military official on the scene.
He described unusually thin metal that could not be damaged and wreckage with strange symbols.
"We had to call them hieroglyphics... The metal was so thin... I tried to bend that stuff and it would not bend."
Then Gen. Roger Ramey held a press conference, switched the story to a "weather balloon," and the cover-up began.
👽1 994 Ariel School, Zimbabwe: Dozens of schoolchildren watched as small beings with huge black eyes emerged from a silver UFO that landed near their playground.
“Little men... people-like, but with distorted features. Like their eyes were huge and their mouths were thin and hard, like a razor line.”
“He was just staring. We were trying not to look at him because he was scary. My eyes and feelings went with him.”
Steven Spielberg based the aliens in his new film Disclosure Day on real close encounter reports like Ariel School, noting the “consistency in the reporting” from witnesses worldwide.
👽1 994 Ariel School, Zimbabwe: Dozens of schoolchildren watched as small beings with huge black eyes emerged from a silver UFO that landed near their playground.
“Little men... people-like, but with distorted features. Like their eyes were huge and their mouths were thin and hard, like a razor line.”
“He was just staring. We were trying not to look at him because he was scary. My eyes and feelings went with him.”
Steven Spielberg based the aliens in his new film Disclosure Day on real close encounter reports like Ariel School, noting the “consistency in the reporting” from witnesses worldwide.
.@Dan_Farah of @ageofdisclosure says the latest U.S. government disclosure that there's an active @FBI investigation into UAP sightings is pretty significant.
He joined us on @CNNTheStoryIs
**Breaking** David Grusch: "I have seen photos of UFO Crash Retrievals" 👽🛸
"This is the most earth shattering thing that changed my world view"
"They were everything from flying discs to egg shape craft & every other morphology"
"They landed or crashed on the surface of the earth"
UFO Disclosure just escalated to a new level.
🚨Avi Loeb Leading a Government UAP Council is NOT the Win You might Think it is
Avi Loeb has now announced that he will chair a new UAP Science Advisory Council, which he says was created after he was tasked by the White House, AARO, ODNI, the FBI and members of the Intelligence Community to assemble a research team.
He named five founding members: Richard Cloete, Regina Sarmiento, Matthew Szydagis, Devesh Nandal and Omer Eldadi. They state that the goal is to help government agencies study UAP through better data, AI tools, instrumentation and scientific analysis.
On paper, that sounds reasonable of course, better data is good after all, along with better sensors. Scientific standards are good. Nobody serious about UFOs should object to collecting higher quality evidence.
But there is a blindingly obvious problem here. Several of the people named already have direct professional ties to Loeb and of course the Galileo Project. Richard Cloete is listed by Harvard's Galileo Project as working under Loeb's supervision, Regina Sarmiento has been described by Loeb as his Galileo Project postdoc, Devesh Nandal has recently coauthored astrophysics work with him, and Omer Eldadi has also coauthored work with Loeb on extraterrestrial intelligence belief surveys.
That doesn't mean they are bad researchers or that they are dishonest people. But it does raise a serious question about independence. If the government is creating a UAP advisory council, why does it look so much like Avi Loeb's own orbit being placed around Avi Loeb?
Think about it because Loeb has increasingly positioned himself as a gatekeeper of what counts as acceptable UFO science. The movement doesn't need another controlled channel that filters the entire subject through one person's preferred framework. It needs independent oversight, whistleblower protection, release of records, chain of custody, crash retrieval documentation, biological evidence, historical files, radar data, satellite data and the names of programs involved.
A council built around "new data" can easily become a way to avoid the old evidence, and that is a real danger here. The public isn't asking the government to start from zero with sky cameras and AI models while decades of classified material remain locked away. The public is asking for the files, videos, programs, witnesses and recovered materials that officials and whistleblowers keep bringing up.
If this council becomes another way to say, "We need more research," while ignoring the material already hidden inside government systems, then it isn't disclosure at all it's delay with a lab coat on. And lets be brutally honest here, Avis track record and recent antics of debunking everything aren't exactly encouraging.
#UAP #UFO #AviLoeb #GalileoProject #UAPDisclosure #AARO #ODNI #Disclosure #NonHumanIntelligence #NHI #ufotwitter #uapX
Professor Avi Loeb announces that the White House, AARO, and ODNI have asked him to assemble and lead a new UAP Science Advisory Council, bringing scientific rigor to the study of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena.
The Harvard astrophysicist who leads the Galileo Project and serves on the Disclosure Foundation's advisory board, has announced that he was asked to assemble and lead a new UAP Science Advisory Council to support the federal government's work on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena.
Writing on the same day the government released its third batch of declassified UAP files, Loeb said the council was established by the White House, the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other members of the Intelligence Community. He described being tasked over the prior week with building a team of scientists to serve on it.
Loeb will chair the council. He named five researchers as its founding members:
Dr. Richard Cloete, data analysis and data management with AI tools
Dr. Regina Sarmiento, data analysis and data management with AI tools
Prof. Matthew Szydagis, instrumentation and data collection
Dr. Devesh Nandal, numerical analysis and astrophysics
Dr. Omer Eldadi, data management, AI, and human psychology
The group's stated purpose is to help government agencies study the nature of UAP through rigorous scientific methods, with an emphasis on collecting and analyzing higher-quality data rather than relitigating older material that cannot be independently verified.
The announcement arrived alongside the third release of government UAP files. Among the newly public documents is a report dated June 5, 2026 and signed by Dr. Jon Kosloski, the director of AARO, describing anomalous phenomena observed by law enforcement officials over two days in October 2023, including an orange "mother" orb that appeared to launch smaller red orbs. According to that report, roughly 40 percent of the phenomena documented in the case remain unexplained.
For Loeb, that unresolved fraction is precisely where scientific attention belongs. He has consistently framed the question around two possibilities, both of which he argues deserve serious study. The first, and most down-to-earth, is that some objects are human-made technologies operated by other nations, in which case their appearance near sensitive sites would represent a national security concern. The second, which he describes as far less likely but far more consequential, is that a small number of objects could have a non-human origin. Distinguishing between the two, he argues, calls for better instruments and careful analysis rather than speculation.
Professor Avi Loeb announces that the White House, AARO, and ODNI have asked him to assemble and lead a new UAP Science Advisory Council, bringing scientific rigor to the study of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena.
The Harvard astrophysicist who leads the Galileo Project and serves on the Disclosure Foundation's advisory board, has announced that he was asked to assemble and lead a new UAP Science Advisory Council to support the federal government's work on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena.
Writing on the same day the government released its third batch of declassified UAP files, Loeb said the council was established by the White House, the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other members of the Intelligence Community. He described being tasked over the prior week with building a team of scientists to serve on it.
Loeb will chair the council. He named five researchers as its founding members:
Dr. Richard Cloete, data analysis and data management with AI tools
Dr. Regina Sarmiento, data analysis and data management with AI tools
Prof. Matthew Szydagis, instrumentation and data collection
Dr. Devesh Nandal, numerical analysis and astrophysics
Dr. Omer Eldadi, data management, AI, and human psychology
The group's stated purpose is to help government agencies study the nature of UAP through rigorous scientific methods, with an emphasis on collecting and analyzing higher-quality data rather than relitigating older material that cannot be independently verified.
The announcement arrived alongside the third release of government UAP files. Among the newly public documents is a report dated June 5, 2026 and signed by Dr. Jon Kosloski, the director of AARO, describing anomalous phenomena observed by law enforcement officials over two days in October 2023, including an orange "mother" orb that appeared to launch smaller red orbs. According to that report, roughly 40 percent of the phenomena documented in the case remain unexplained.
For Loeb, that unresolved fraction is precisely where scientific attention belongs. He has consistently framed the question around two possibilities, both of which he argues deserve serious study. The first, and most down-to-earth, is that some objects are human-made technologies operated by other nations, in which case their appearance near sensitive sites would represent a national security concern. The second, which he describes as far less likely but far more consequential, is that a small number of objects could have a non-human origin. Distinguishing between the two, he argues, calls for better instruments and careful analysis rather than speculation.
Our advisory board member Avi Loeb announces that the White House, AARO, and ODNI have asked him to assemble and lead a new UAP Science Advisory Council, bringing scientific rigor to the study of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena.
https://t.co/PEWi5k0R5L
From a well-informed source who has seen the UAP videos still being withheld by @DeptofWar, accessible on its highly classified SIPRnet servers:
"Among many others, we have videos of the following:
"I have personally seen this one on SIPR. A video from six years ago from the Persian Gulf, full color, daytime, of a white orb with plasma aura around it flying out of the water near a tanker, pilot then goes white hot and black hot with no joy on identification attempt, then the orb flies out and roughly halfway through the ~13 min video, another white orb flies into the area as the pilot diverted to track the first one, and the second one hangs out for a while before zipping off again. The video then ends after a few more minutes of the helo pilot tracking the first orb.
"I have not seen these but they have been described to me by someone now public who was in the UAPTF:
"1. A video of a black disc three times the size of an oil platform that was captured speeding underwater near a platform in the Gulf of Mexico.
"2. A video from a B-52 in which a disc approaches, slows down to keep pace, then zips off at the end, all the while with NHI looking out of the windows/forcefields/whatever they call windows.
"3. This one was described to me by a source at ODNI. An orb playing cat and mouse with a Reaper drone at 30000 feet or so up. It forces it to go evasive, then keeps pace with it, zips around it on the right wing, then zips off. All of this was 4K or better, as told to me by my source, who is extremely well cleared and someone who I trust implicitly."
I have also spoken to multiple TS-SCI-cleared insiders who have described many similar irrefutably anomalous videos and imagery still being withheld by the Pentagon. I'm told it's extremely unlikely this imagery will be formally released by AARO and that the public is being misled in a clear strategy of disinformation. Whether @SecWar and @POTUS are aware of this deception is unclear. Let's hope they don't allow themselves or the public to be so deceived.
🤯Steven Spielberg says [Aliens]: “they have been here” and “they are here.”
He makes this wild statement based on the circumstantial evidence he has followed throughout his life and the Congressional testimony he has heard.
But the most mind-blowing part? Spielberg says the movie tackles the "ontological shock" this would cause to human faith, and it actually takes the position of the Church. He asks the ultimate question: Is God only the God of Earth, or the God of every civilization in the cosmos?
Setting aside all the testimonies, UAP conferences, and public evidence, my question is: Is his film really going to challenge people's faith in God?
Some UFO insiders claim that the government knows about several kinds of alien beings. But these should be treated as claims, not proven facts.
Dr. Hal Puthoff has claimed that the U.S. possesses bodies from "four different alien species."
I mean, we literally have ancient texts discussing these kinds of UFO-related phenomena for centuries, yet religious faith only grew stronger over time.
Modern humans are arrogant enough to think we are the universe's only intelligent life. Ancient texts, however, are packed with non-human beings:
• Hinduism has devas, celestial, and cosmic beings.
• Islam has jinn, a parallel intelligent species unseen by humans.
• Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all have angels and demons, beings that exist between the human and divine realms.
So if intelligent non-human beings were revealed tomorrow, would that really destroy faith... or simply expand our understanding of creation?
Government disclosure won't kill faith. It’s going to prove what ancient humans knew all along: we are part of a massive, crowded, and perfectly designed universe. 🤯🛸🧬
UFO whistleblower David Grusch says the United States government has knowledge of at least four different types of non-human intelligence.
Some are "bipedal life" with physical bodies.
Others are "sentient plasmoid life."
A bipedal life form is a two-legged, human-like physical being.
A sentient plasmoid life form is a hypothetical intelligent “plasma/energy” entity with no solid body.
He says the secrecy began in 1954 under President Eisenhower.