@AndyGlockner The idea of kicking in overtime feels like a case of over analysis. In college, where there would be a full second OT, it makes sense to get the info for the first OT. But there is a benefit to the third possession that people ignore
@stevemagness Football (NFL and College) is estimated on some things (starting/stopping the clock in general; spotting the ball) and hyper specific in others (does the tip of the ball pass the first down marker or goal line). I just told my (almost) 9-year old how it can be maddening
@AndyGlockner Without tenths of a second, maybe the stadium score board rounds down (goes to 0:00 at 0:00.9 or 0:00.4). So it shows 0 but that’s not time expiring
@AndyGlockner@saw111671 If cooks wasn’t contacted, he still would have gone to the ground. Not the same as Adams which makes what happens with contact and control of the ball important
@ralphDrussoATH Do you think the reverse is true - he planned on doing the interview circuit, shared that with the team, and that led to declining any bowl bids?
@AndyGlockner The one replay question I have is do they need 1 angle to be conclusive, or can they combine two or more angles to say it's conclusive. Because with two or more, you can see where the ball is on his body and where he crossed the line. And if they can't it's a major replay flaw.
@AndyGlockner I did feel the same way about the Patriots - the Chiefs' execution causes the other team to play tight and try to make a key play (or chase points) which ends up turning the game. It took the '07 Giants to show that they could bleed.
Drew Allar gets bailed out on two previous poor decisions to negate picks. Greg McElroy says they should be aggressive since he “always makes good decisions” and then he throws an amazingly horrendous pick