Record de ordenaciones sacerdotales en la Fraternidad Sacerdotal San Pedro: ¡25 nuevos sacerdotes para la Tradición!
- 13 del Seminario de Alemania @wigratzbad
- 12 del Seminario de EE.UU. @fsspna
Deo grátias!
I’ve had various requests to share the article I wrote summarising the differences between the old and new Masses, and the motives for the changes.
So here it is again :
https://t.co/Ye2hUEBpmg
Learn more about the consecrations and what will happen going forward at the 2026 Conference for Catholic Tradition! Click on the link below and reserve your spot today!
https://t.co/84Un7kGWJw
"According to sources cited by Tribune Chrétienne, discussions in apostate Rome are no longer focused solely on the Society’s leadership. The proposed document could reportedly affect the entire structure of the SSPX, including its approximately 700 priests, seminaries, apostolates, and even the faithful who regularly participate in its sacramental life..."
https://t.co/sPok7kjsAa
EL MODERNISMO SERÁ LA FALSA RELIGIÓN DEL ANTICRISTO
"El modernismo es la última evolución del protestantismo liberal y es la herejía más sutil y compleja que ha existido y puede existir, de modo que sin duda será la religión del Anticristo; porque concilia en sí las dos notas antagónicas con que San Pablo describe misteriosamente al Hombre de Pecado, y que hasta hoy parecían incompatibles:
1°, será adversario de toda religión y culto;
2°, se sentará en el templo haciéndose adorar como Dios.
El modernismo deshace toda religión existente, APROPIÁNDOSE EMPERO DE SUS FORMAS EXTERIORES, a las cuales vacía de contenido para rellenarlas con la idolatría del Hombre".
(P. Leonardo Castellani, Comentarios en la Suma de Teología de Santo Tomás.)
“Man should tremble, the world should quake, all Heaven should be deeply moved when the Son of God appears on the altar in the hands of the priest.”
~ St. Francis of Assisi
🚨 BREAKING: Bishop Pierre Roy has announced that he will consecrate Transalpine Redemptorist founder and rector major @FrMichaelMary a bishop on July 25 at their community on Papa Stronsay.
Key excerpts from the letter are below. It can be read in full at the Transalpine Redemptorist's blog here: https://t.co/v2XyF0nWYp
- "He will be consecrated in the absence of an apostolic mandate, since the See of Rome is clearly occupied by the enemies of God. And yet, his role will be to teach, govern, and sanctify in all fortitude and humility the flock that will gather around him. I cannot grant him jurisdiction, and I fully acknowledge this. But Christ, the invisible head of the Church and source of all jurisdiction, can, and He certainly will in the limits of the present necessities of the Church, in the absence of a true Supreme Pontiff, so that he may shepherd the scattered flock that will recognize him as a Catholic bishop."
- "Church history shows that heretical bishops are combated by establishing Catholic bishops, just as impostor popes are combated by a true pope."
- “I asked Father Michael Mary, without any solicitation from the Redemptorists and despite some initial reluctance, to accept this consecration for the good of the Church and their community.”
- “Whilst I know the Redemptorists would have been content to continue as we are, not asking for any further assistance, I fear that I cannot properly fulfill my role and duty to them due to the immense distances that separate us …. it seemed reasonable and necessary to give the Redemptorists a bishop who could properly care for a flock that already knew the sound of his fatherly voice.
- “I have found in the Transalpine Redemptorists a genuine love for the Church, and this disposition alone is enough to suggest that this community will accomplish much good under the guidance of a Catholic bishop”
Le Parlement canadien s'apprête à promulguer une loi supprimant l'exemption religieuse en matière de « discours haineux », ouvrant la voie à des poursuites contre quiconque professerait publiquement la morale catholique traditionnelle.
Ce qui semblait, il y a encore quelques années, relever de la dystopie est en passe de devenir réalité au Canada. Le Parlement d'Ottawa s'apprête en effet à adopter définitivement le projet de loi C-9, dit Combatting Hate Act, dont l'une des dispositions les plus redoutables est passée presque inaperçue dans la presse généraliste : la suppression pure et simple de l'exemption religieuse jusqu'alors inscrite dans le code pénal canadien en matière de « discours haineux ».
Jusqu'ici, la loi canadienne protégeait explicitement le droit d'exprimer « une opinion sur un sujet religieux ou une opinion fondée sur la croyance en un texte religieux ». Cette protection, si modeste fût-elle, constituait un rempart minimal contre la criminalisation de la prédication chrétienne. Le projet de loi C-9 l'abolit. Désormais, quiconque citera les Écritures ou exposera la doctrine morale de l'Église sur le mariage et la famille pourra, selon le contexte, se voir poursuivi en justice.
Josh Dehaas, de la Fondation constitutionnelle canadienne, a tenu à préciser que la lecture de passages de la Sainte Écriture ne devrait pas, en elle-même, entraîner des poursuites pénales. Mais c’est pour ajouter aussitôt que « certains versets des textes religieux pourraient désormais donner lieu à des charges selon le contexte, notamment en fonction du moment et du lieu où ils sont lus, et des autres paroles prononcées lors de cette lecture ». Autrement dit, un prêtre, un prédicateur, un père de famille expliquant la doctrine catholique sur la complémentarité des sexes ou l'indissolubilité du mariage pourrait, selon les circonstances, se trouver exposé à des poursuites.
Le vote du texte est le fruit d'une alliance politique entre le Parti libéral au pouvoir et le Bloc québécois, formation laïciste et nationaliste. La démarche est révélatrice : c'est au nom d'une laïcité agressive, et non d'une quelconque préoccupation pour l'ordre public, que l'on entend réduire au silence la parole chrétienne.
Pour les catholiques, le signal est clair. Ce qui est aujourd'hui légalement permis au Canada — professer que le mariage est l'union d'un homme et d'une femme, rappeler l'enseignement de saint Paul sur la condition sexuée de l'être humain — pourrait demain valoir à son auteur une comparution devant un tribunal pénal.
La persécution des chrétiens n'est plus seulement l'affaire des régimes totalitaires agressifs d'Asie ou du Moyen-Orient : elle frappe désormais à la porte des démocraties libérales occidentales, sous les habits rassurants du « vivre-ensemble », de la « lutte contre la haine » et de l’« inclusion ». Autant de termes qui ne valent que pour ceux qui déterminent les règles du jeu. https://t.co/zRzKt7rMli
Prevost svela (involontariamente?) la frode sinodale.
Il vero motivo della minacciata scomunica alla FSSPX non è la Consacrazione di nuovi Vescovi senza il mandato pontificio, ma il rifiuto del Concilio Vaticano II (come nel mio caso). Prevost sposta il focus della questione, confermando di utilizzare strumentalmente le sanzioni canoniche. Le Consacrazioni episcopali sono solo il pretesto.
Da quale entità si viene “scomunicati”, quando la “scomunica” è comminata dal capo di una “chiesa post-conciliare ” che cerca solo di legittimare se stessa canonizzando i propri papi e dogmatizzando i propri errori? una “chiesa” che si qualifica proprio per non essere “preconciliare”, ossia Cattolica, Apostolica, Romana? È come se Ario pretendesse di scomunicare Sant’Atanasio…
Queste esternazioni ai giornalisti a Castel Gandolfo confermano che essere scomunicati dalla chiesa conciliare e sinodale è una patente di ortodossia cattolica.
Se Prevost fosse il capo della chiesa d'Inghilterra, o di una setta calvinista, o di un movimento pentecostale o di un culto amazzonico, parlerebbe diversamente? No.
L'unica voce che non può fare propria è quella della Chiesa “preconciliare”, cioè l’unica vera Chiesa Cattolica Apostolica Romana, alla quale non ritiene di appartenere. E allo stesso tempo Prevost afferma che chi si dichiara Cattolico e rifiuta il Vaticano II è in scisma con lui.
Più chiaro di così...
Anyone excommunicated in the wake of the SSPX consecrations should immediately appeal. The excommunications will be automatically suspended until the appeal is heard, which it probably never will be.
Until the kind of cognitive dissonance summed up in these two headlines is resolved, the ecclesiastical chaos will continue, and so will diametrically opposed and necessarily divisive responses. Unity must be rooted in truth, not in will-power. And since this statement can itself be interpreted in opposed senses, let me be clear: until the traditional Roman Rite is free everywhere and always, and the rupture introduced after the Council is healed, there is no question that the Western Church is and will remain in a state of crisis.
Archbishop Lefebvre: “Satan’s master stroke will therefore be to spread the revolutionary principles introduced into the Church by the authority of the Church itself, placing this authority in a situation of incoherence and permanent contradiction”
The Avila Incident is being reported as if it were a one-off. In fact there is a harsh and generalised suppression of the Tridentine Mass in much of Spain.
All Pope Leo has to do is issue, preferably before July 1, a list of binding teachings one must belief post-1965 that one wasn’t obligated to believe before 1962. Any layman or cleric who objects to any of those binding teachings would be “rejecting Vatican 2”. If such teachings do exist, then put them out publicly for all to see. Why is that so hard?