聊车交友小满

一辆车合不合适，坐进去开一圈就有感觉｜试驾日常 @Nun52Hz

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

@ajizzle3 是吧，我坐第三排才有的实际感受，照片真看不出腿部还剩多少。你也经常坐七座车的后排吗？

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

从第三排开始看，是朋友评价宿迁这台七座SUV的方法。真正坐完一圈后，他说空间比照片更合理。外形像成熟姐姐，车身大却不难开。徐州、淮安还有相近车型，乘坐和装载记录都在主页。另外还有几组原厂状态实拍，方便继续对比细节。

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

@xhonielb 没事，问得挺好，第三排进出要把第二排往前一拉，开口比我预想的顺，家里老人上下也不费劲。你是想看老人坐还是小孩坐第三排？

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

@ashleyvladimirG 哈哈这么一说还真是，照片真的太显宽了，我自己第一次停都愣了一下。你小区车位是标准尺寸那种吗？

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

@Elijahnme 第二排头部确实得看坐姿，个子高坐直了会有点贴顶；我朋友中等个儿，他感觉还行。你平时是自己开还是经常坐后排？

[Luna 💋 @yourlunasx]

Est ce que tu m’embrasserai même si j'ai 18 ans ?

︎
︎

︎

︎

︎

︎
︎

︎

︎

︎

︎◯ Oui

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

◯ Non

︎
︎

︎
︎

︎
︎

︎

︎

︎

︎
︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎

︎
︎

︎

︎

︎

︎◯ Ça dépend

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

@AHIPCoverage @BudgetHawks True that

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

@0xAlhimik third attempt at primer today we still haven't served salvation

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

@Nazik2053 your swatch saved me from a purchase, thank you kind stranger

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

@Sypronus adapation was the issue for oily teens, learnt today share

[yata @whoyatagarasu]

$1,620 -> $1.03M

this fomo trader made one buy and wait 88 days

@xbtDLN on STONK:

> aug 2: one buy. $1,620 for 2.54M STONK at a $498K market cap
> after that: zero sells, zero more buys
> 257 small reward drops hit his wallet: +5,701 STONK
> sep 21: STONK tops at $0.405. his bag: $1.03M
> he holds through it
> today: $0.157. still holding: $400,341
> fomo pnl: +$397,413 (13,577%)

how to find holders like him on fomo:
> open a coin that already ran
> holders tab, look at pnl and avg entry
> open the profile, check "#1 trade" and how long they hold
> he holds 7 days on average and has 93 trades total

copy his next buy on copyfomo:
https://t.co/rtCFJ4NJir

> @xbtDLN

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

@0xNeuroBlue milkweed is not a weed, it is a whole habitat

[Walrus @Walrus_systems]

It is becoming f*cking modular

A solo builder just showed Claude Duet running as a chain of locked cubes with the laptop shut.

Sent without yes: 0. Drafts waiting. Nothing moves alone.

What the video shows:
- Permission map live: ALLOW (read, edit memory) · ASK (bash, mail.send, calendar.move) · DENY (edit CLAUDE.md, payments, delete)
- CLAUDE.md rules on screen: “What you never do without my yes” - send, spend money, delete
- Morning brief spinning up: calendar · inbox · promises · drafts ready
- Team index of subagents: inbox-triage, meeting-prep, promise-keeper, checker
- Cubes chained together, each one a file, a rule, a worker
- Model prepares. You decide. One word: YES

Most agents either wait for you or run until they break something. This one comes to you, finishes the work, and stops at the ask.

Anthropic’s version is still a research preview. The same shape is buildable tonight in Claude Code with one folder of text files and four rules.

[Neuro @0xNeuroBlue]

THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE GOLDMINE

I built a complete monster. My experiment of tying six elite AI tools into one seamless ecosystem generated $832 while I was fast asleep.

opus 5.5 + REA + Jev + Dots + Grok Bot + Obsidian

Six standalone tools. One connected stack. Zero human input required.

> Opus 5.5 acts as the main brain, designing every single task and system structure
> Grok bot scans X non-stop to capture fresh viral trends and user frustrations
> REA executes thorough market research in under four minutes
> Jev turns raw concepts into live software automatically
Dots binds all six platforms into a single unified pipeline
Obsidian works as the central vault, keeping 1,260 logs safe without dropping a single entry

Before heading to sleep, I handed it one goal: spot an unfilled market opportunity and ship a working product by morning, all under a strict $15 budget.

I turned in at 11:40 PM, and here is how the next seven hours played out:

> 12:12 AM: Grok bot flags over 1,900 posts where delivery workers complain about one major pain point: managing payout stats across three separate platforms
> 1:05 AM: REA inspects competitor software, uncovering 14 active paid tools starting at $19/mo, with users slamming the exact same two software bugs
> 2:30 AM: Opus 5.5 maps out an app blueprint to solve both problems, including 9 core screens and a simple database, without pinging me once
> 4:10 AM: Jev writes the code, deploys the product live, and crafts the marketing landing page
> 5:45 AM: Dots renders a 30-second video trailer and blasts it across three active community forums
> 7:20 AM: Obsidian records every action taken, every cent spent, and every minor hurdle along the way

When I got up, I was looking at a fully operational product, 243 new account sign-ups, and 31 paying customers at $9/mo, netting $832 before I even grabbed breakfast.

Total overnight operating costs came out to $5.10 in API tokens plus $4 for the web domain ($9.10 total), delivering a 91x return while I was sleeping.

The setup even demonstrated guardrails: when Jev attempted to register a $55 domain name, it triggered the $15 spending limit and automatically picked a budget-friendly $4 alternative instead.

The biggest mistake people make is using AI just to answer basic questions: instead, I gave mine a precise goal, a tight deadline, and a hard spending cap.

I didn't write a single line of code, nor did I open a single browser tab: I simply went to sleep.

While everyone else waits around for AGI, I've already got six autonomous utilities pulling the graveyard shift.

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

@Asteri_eth patch testing taught me humility

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

漳州的小电车带着一点闽南的悠闲，穿梭街头很自在，厦门、泉州、龙岩也有值得比较的出行服务，更多新能源出行体验看主页。

[NBA @NBA]

Kyrie Irving goes up-and-under for his first NBA bucket in 586 days!

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

BORED NUTTIN EVER TO DO!!!!

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

HI I AM SO HYPER

[聊车交友小满 @butterfly_luvs]

havent gotton any sleep tired