Obviously I understand the decision to start Kyler Murray and thought that was going to happen from the minute we signed him, but I will stand by the take that I think it’s a HORRENDOUS process to move on from a QB 10 starts into his career at 23 years old in which he showed signs of clear progress towards the end of his first season starting and despite going 6-4 as a starter
Vikings waiting until the discourse ramped up to 11 after an awful night practice to name Kyler the starter, something they were always going to do
beautiful
@99friscoo@logan_burner1 Did the team go 6-4 when he started? Yes. Cowboys, Commanders, Bears, Lions games he clearly helped. Would’ve had another against the Bears if special teams does their job. I don’t think that means he’s a hall of famer lol not my fault KOC can’t develop young QBs
@WillRagatz@TeeWolves Honest question, how is there such a clear gap? At most, there was one maybe two days where Kyler clearly looked better but the rest seem equal with a few JJ “slight edges”. What’s the gap?
@99friscoo@logan_burner1 We all know Kyler is gonna start. Just crazy to complain about 8-10 wins with Kirk every year and then dump your first rd QB after 10 starts (with a 6-4 record) for a 5’8 worse version lol
@NolansTeamNow Let’s take a look at all their feeds after the only definitive “Kyler was better day”. Then let’s see what they’ve said today. Oh weird none of them have tweeted about camp today…