In an ideal world, Bitcoin miners wouldn't need to sell as much of their BTC
As NAT is being adopted by major pools, they now have a secondary revenue-stream
So the greater NAT's mcap, the less BTC needed to cover miner’s overheads
Are you SURE that NAT has no utility/value?🤔
@RealBobManning I checked on GPT and it had some interesting suggestions....
Tari Eason
Herb Jones
However would probably require a combination of Hauser/Pritchard + Picks though
@KeithSmithNBA Hugo eventually replaces DWhite in the starting 5
Trade DWhite Next season for a bonafide big man Star
PP becomes the next starting PG
That's my wishlist for next season.
Mainnet was just the beginning.
Testnet + $TNK Faucet now live.
> Build & Test
> Refine your contracts
> Ship with confidence
Then earn on mainnet, with 25% of transaction fees paid to contract deployers.
All info & links below 🧵
The thing people are missing about NAT 👀
As more mining pools like @SpiderPool integrate @tap_protocol, NAT is automatically distributed across thousands of miners.
So organic NAT holder growth and TAP Protocol discovery is now baked-in at Bitcoin's core infrastructure layer.
We’re seeing increased usage of the TAP bridge (Bitcoin🔁Ethereum)
Remember, you pay ZERO bridge fees if your Ethereum wallet holds 50+ $TAP
▶️ https://t.co/t4kiuuvU0E
@KeithSmithNBA@SamLaFranceNBA Not sure if Keith replied to that question specifically regarding Bassey... Looks to me more like a general answer... @KeithSmithNBA care to confirm?