🙇♀️ Chag Sukkot Sameach! 🔥Happy Feast of Tabernacles!
👉Blessings in the feast of His dwelling = 💯 joy, covering, and Christ’s presence… 👉May this feast remind you that the true Tabernacle is Christ Himself.🕊️👈💯👈💯👈🔥🙏
California is now the first state in the nation to deem “Jewish” an ethnic and racial identity, rather than just a religious affiliation.
Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday signed SB 1387, a bill that expands California’s legal definition of ethnicity “to include Jewish identity” in demographic data collection. As of January 1, 2029, forms distributed by public entities like schools and prisons will need to include a “Jewish” category when asking for voluntary disclosures of ethnicity or race.
Read more on The Times of Israel.
Below is a speech from Hitler in which he openly declares his intentions for world domination.
“No people had more right to the concept of ruling the world (Weltherrschaft) than the German people. We would have had this right, and no other nation.”
(Stormy applause)
"Not England, not Spain, not Holland - no other nation could have had an inborn right, on the basis of its energy and competence, and also its numerical strength, to claim the domination of the world.
In the first division of the world, we fell short, but we stand now at the beginning of a new great shake-up of this world. Today, some people claim that we are entering an age of peace, but I have to say to them: Gentlemen, you have a poor understanding of the horoscope of our times, which points, as never before, not to peace but to war.”
Adolf Hitler, addressing his followers on 5 November 1930 in the Rhenish town of Mannheim.
The fact that Tucker Carlson is historically illiterate isn't surprising. What is harder to dismiss is how consistently that illiteracy manifests in making Hitler and the Nazis look better.
History lesson on WW2 by Tucker Carlson.
•The story Americans were given about WWII is all wrong ✅
•America’s decline has been obvious since 1945 ✅
•Genuine American exceptionalism was lost because the U.S. entered WWII ✅
•America should never have allied with Stalin to fight Hitler (instead allying with Hitler) ✅
•Pearl Harbor was a false flag/America knew Pearl Harbor was going to happen ✅
•Churchill was the chief villain of WWII ✅
•Churchill was pushed by Zionists to fight Hitler ✅
•Churchill wrecked his own country ✅
•We collectively agree Hitler was the worst person and that if you could kill baby Hitler you would ✅
•BUT it was unreasonable (and un-Christian) for Dietrich Bonhoeffer to attempt to kill Hitler as an adult during WWII ✅
•The West didn't win the war in any meaningful sense ✅
Demoralized media here, trying to convince the public that they are not at war, that nobody is trying to abolish their civilization, and that they only want “equality.” It is a classic motte-and-bailey.
The trick works because “equality” can mean two very different things while sounding like the same claim. To a normie, equality means equal rights, fair treatment, and protection from discrimination. That’s the safe, non-activist meaning. It asks for changes within the existing order without challenging the order itself.
In the revolutionary grammar, “equality” means activism. It is a mandate to find inequality, identify the structures said to produce it, and act against them. Unequal outcomes, inherited institutions, traditional roles, social hierarchies, cultural norms, and other distinctions become evidence that domination still exists. Carried to its endpoint, the project is to sublate Western civilization itself: dismantle its inherited forms while preserving and reappropriating the achievements worth carrying into a higher social order. Equality becomes the standard by which the existing order is judged, dissolved, and rebuilt.
Thats why equality can function as a solvent. The argument begins with an obvious injustice most people agree should be corrected, then moves outward. First a rule is unequal, then an institution, then the surrounding culture, and eventually the civilization that produced them becomes the deeper problem.
The motte-and-bailey works by sliding between those meanings. When challenged, it retreats to the safe version: we only mean equal treatment, equal rights, basic fairness. Who could object to that? Once the challenge passes, the broader meaning returns, and “equality” again becomes a reason to dismantle inherited distinctions and institutions.
So the public hears equality as a promise to make the existing order fairer. The revolutionary can use the same word as a mandate to put the existing order itself on trial.
That double meaning is what makes the deception work. The moderate meaning reassures the public that nothing fundamental is happening. The radical meaning allows a much more fundamental transformation to proceed under the same word.
A secular Ashkenazi New Yorker, a religious Mizrahi from Iraq, and a recent convert are not the same ethnicity. They can still all be Jews.The accurate description is a people with a shared law, history and, for most, some ancestral tie to the Levant, split into several ethnic subgroups, and also a religion you can join or leave. One checkbox cannot carry that.
@finn20142017@DSterling1948@Mish_K_ I oppose the whole machine ⚙️💯😐❗️
I don’t pick favorites… & I don’t defend Any flags… 🚫💩
”I don’t trust anyone with a tongue 👅
Gay🏳️🌈 Straight 👩❤️👨 Black ⚫️ White ⚪️ Red 🟥 Blue 🟦 … cuz they’re all just part of the system” 💯@IAMTOMMACDONALD🔥
https://t.co/fMlO07KXyo
The party can say whatever it wants, but it cannot change that anti-Zionism is just the updated form of antisemitism that makes it politically palatable to idiots in the era since 1948.