@CrucibleOnX Do you have hearing problems or comprehension problems?
If Charlie was PUBLICLY, constantly, relentlessly confirming his friendship with Candace, regardless of detractors, but PRIVATELY talking smack, then CHARLIE was 2-faced and a liar, so why believe anything else he said?
Not remotely. The beauty of seeking the truth is you actually want the truth.
If the texts are real, release them. Release his whole phone, for all I care. I have no fear of what it will say because it just adds data to trying to find the truth.
But if you’re going to selectively release texts to try to damage Candace, understand it’s also damaging Charlie by making him out to be a relentless liar.
And it adds nothing to trying to find out who killed Charlie Kirk, how, and why.
But, no, I’m not scared or trying to control anything.
@BackRoomGames1@ChewingTheVoid That’s actually the point, and you apparently missed it. They had it SCHEDULED that he was going to go change his will, and yet he was mysteriously killed right before doing so.
@JohPersso Still awaiting the explanation of how Andrew supposedly read verbatim what the texts said, back during his opening to the debate, and yet they don’t actually say exactly what he read aloud..?
@paleochristcon How come the message you read during the debate doesn’t match the blurry message you released? Can you not read, or did the message change?
@prout_prout07@charduval@PBDsPodcast Here’s a question…. Why are you looking for evidence to convince this particular person?
Why not look for all available evidence to find out who (or who all) killed Charlie, and serve justice, rather than trying to put together specific info that will only get THIS dude killed?
@prout_prout07@charduval@PBDsPodcast Having no doubt he deserves the death penalty before he’s even been to trial or there is actual proof tying all the individual pieces together, much less to HIM, is disgusting and against what the I Justice system represents.
Archbishop Viganò condemns the Pachamama ritual performed by a Vatican official and bishops ahead of Pope Leo’s Peru visit.
"How would the Martyrs of the Faith judge this apostasy of the clergy and the leaders of the conciliar-synodal church?" @CarloMVigano
https://t.co/0eCNAfhkiY
Over 50% of men that dress up like women in prison are in there for SA offenses.
Whereas only 11% of regular men who don’t dress up like women are in there for SA offenses.
sources google. Let’s hope that the real men in prison teach them some lessons. Here in the state of Florida I’m proud to have helped past the law that if a man enters my restroom or the restroom of my little girl dressed up like a woman or at all, that I just need to call the cops and they will escort him out. Usually it involves concrete.
Did you know that 11% of men in prisons in the United States are there for Sa charges?
But over 50% of men who like to dress up like women and little girls are there for sa?
It’s right on the front of Google.
I have some pretty sick 🏳️⚧️exuals trying to defend that on x. 🤦♀️
Taylor is right.
And for all you parents out there thinking of rolling the dice by sending your kid to a fancy college so they can have its name on their resume, remember they will probably meet their spouse there.
Good luck with that.
I have plenty of friends and relatives who are not fans of Trump. But if those friends and relatives bash Trump endlessly, but never allow you to criticize Joe Biden or Kamala?
It’s almost impossible to have a conversation with them.
@prout_prout07@charduval@PBDsPodcast You really are this stupid? All this time I thought it was an act…
The onus is on YOU, as the one accusing someone to prove they are guilty. This is the USA, and people don’t actually have to prove they are innocent of you can’t prove otherwise beyond reasonable doubt.