If transactivists hadn't spent the last twenty years a) enforcing rigid gender roles and insisting people who don't conform to Barbie and Ken are the opposite sex and b) encouraging men to use the female facilities, gnc women wouldn't have to deal with this half as much.
The harm to GNC women of being asked if they’re in the right toilet pales by a hundred degrees of magnitude relative to the harm done to GNC women by suggesting they’re really men & changing their bodies in a way that irreversibly impacts their physical and cognitive development.
@newsandpics What does ‘anti-gender’ even mean? The video seems to be describing and showing campaigns against women, abortion and LGB people plus standing up for women rights ie against extremes of gender identity so very unclear what the umbrella term of ‘anti-gender’ means. Odd.
Sigh.
Yet another paedophile man being reported as a ‘woman’ by @WalesOnline.
Likely referred to as a ‘woman’ by the courts and his crimes recorded as by a female perpetrator by @swpolice too.
At least he’s in a man’s prison.
https://t.co/b669TibufA
Men who don’t claim 2 be women can respond 2 ways to recent clarification of UK law re single-sex spaces (eg toilets & changing rooms)
1. They can decry it & demonize women for wanting their own spaces
2. They can be safe & welcoming to ALL males in their spaces
I go 2
You?
@elniedunne@LoudBonnet I also think we need to be careful not to allow the shoddy behaviour of a small number of charities to affect all. 75% of charities have income < £100k, and in my experience very few charities are problematic yet they create a lot of noise.
@elniedunne@LoudBonnet increased funding by 27% to £37.9m from this year. The current register of charities desperately needs an overhaul. The CH register is far superior. I’d also like to see a history of trusteeships and charities to mirror CH useful also when charities incorporate.
If you cannot contemplate that (and are not interested in a dialogue on it by, for example, limiting responses) and do not understand that rights exist in an ecosystem of balances and clashes not extra rights, it is hard to take your comments seriously, even when not patronising.
When your starting premise is that rights and interests do not conflict because of a general statement about human rights being everything you do not understand how rights intersect. Clashes are not about giving extra rights, but about different weights in different circumstances
Please stop doing this @SkyNews.
The guidance is just guidance. The law hasn't changed. Single sex facilities should always have been single sex. The clue is in the name.
The only slight change was last yr when the Sup Ct cleared up some confusion about the effect of a GRC.
And again:
The @EHRC Code of Practice coming into force on 5 Aug makes not a jot of difference. Single sex toilets should always have been based on biological sex. Self-id was never lawful. The Sup Ct clarified last yr that a GRC doesn’t get you into opposite sex toilets either.
@tribunaltweets This is great, thank you. I was wondering if you might add the dates of the letters in brackets? I think it will helpful for us to have a sense of the timeline. Great if possible, no worries if not. Thank you
I am seeing more and more complex human rightsy type arguments, all of which would ultimately lead to women losing single sex provision. Bit of a coincidence? Do they not notice that it’s not working in court?
📌 A new chapter for Seen In Journalism 📌
After more than two years leading Seen in Journalism, our brilliant founder Cath Leng has decided it's time to step back.
I’m delighted to be taking over as Director of Seen in Journalism. Some of you may already know me from my recent journalism for The Telegraph, The Mail on Sunday, UnHerd and Spiked. Before this, I worked for many years as an education correspondent, writing and editing mainly for The Guardian.
And yes, I am that Janet whose choir was cancelled from performing at the London Marathon- and who had a very public (but good-humoured) spat with Hugh Laurie on X (I'm over at @jan_murray).
Cath isn’t disappearing, though. She’s written a reflection on what Seen in Journalism has achieved over the past few years, which we’ll be publishing shortly - and plans to stay involved in the group. We also hope to record a handover podcast together, looking back at SIJ’s journey so far and discussing where we go next.
During the past 28 months, our members have submitted consultation responses, engaged with press regulators, met editors and correspondents, lodged complaints, contributed to media debates and articles and hosted events, including a parliamentary briefing on the proposed puberty blockers trial, earlier this year.
We’ve achieved a great deal, but we believe there’s an opportunity to build on that work by adding education and training to what we do. We hope to engage with newsrooms, journalism programmes and businesses - starting conversations about the challenges of reporting sex and gender accurately, and providing practical resources to help journalists, editors and decision-makers navigate these issues with confidence.
Over the coming weeks, we’ll be sharing more about our plans, including regular articles, the return of our popular No Fear No Favour podcast, original research and new training opportunities.
If you'd like to follow our work, please subscribe to our Substack (it's free). And if you're able to support us as a paid subscriber, you'll be helping us expand our work over the coming months.
Link below 👇
Janet Murray
Director, Seen in Journalism
There seems to be some chatter about importance of philosophical arguments about sex and how it’s defined. I’m as interested in ideas and words as much as the next woman but I am curious whether, say, women being paid less than men is a philosophical argument or material reality.