@0LuboLubo0@SPFLWatch@Oxladesoup88 With regard to your other replies, I saw one which excluded decisions “you didn’t agree with” which I felt was not the way to do it so didn’t know the impact this had
@0LuboLubo0@SPFLWatch@Oxladesoup88 Agree, decisions wise, based on current KMI, but would not be surprised if KMI took the view of the Motherwell Hearts penalty being not clear and obvious, and therefore not favouring Hearts overall. Any conspiracy, however, is ultimately not backed up by data across the season.
@0LuboLubo0@SPFLWatch@Oxladesoup88 I did not include cup games in my tally, accept the unanimous decision point, arguable which way is better with regards to this. Can accept the view that unanimous is better.
@0LuboLubo0@SPFLWatch@Oxladesoup88 I accept the lack of relations to other factors in the match as a limitation of the points gained, however modelling the rest of each football match after these events using some sort of Monte Carlo simulation is not going to happen to argue on twitter
@0LuboLubo0@SPFLWatch@Oxladesoup88 Final tallies:
Hearts:
Incorrect Decisions (ID) for: 3
ID against: 2
Net differential: +1 (As originally stated)
Net points gained with ID: 1 point.
Celtic:
ID for: 1
ID against: 1
Net differential: 0 (As originally stated)
Net points gained with ID: 2 points.
@0LuboLubo0@SPFLWatch@Oxladesoup88 If you had gone “through the data yourself” (rather than relying on AI),you would have found that after VAR interventions the panels found the net differential +1 for Hearts, 0 for Celtic, -1 for Rangers. Depending on panel this week, it could actually be Celtic favoured overall.
@knowerofball05@9I9EGOD@replies_guy@bump834@USGA The R&A don’t allow match play scores for handicap. Only the USGA do. That doesn’t argue your point, but just that not everywhere allows match play and most likely strokes.