@peacockreports@peacockreports i've just stood this up, which could be interesting in what happens between projected rain and river response
https://t.co/InDai3xqIH
https://t.co/InDai3xqIH
get predictions of flood flow likelihood over the next 72 hours. no modelling, no wait...just predictions registered before they happen
A storm hit the Midlands yesterday. A model that had never seen the River Tame — or any river data since 2019 — said the peak would be 28 m³/s, somewhere between 18 and 46.
The gauge said 27.
Rain, soil, 622,000 old storms, and how wet the ground was. That's the whole method.
Yesterday's summer storm dropped 50 mm or rainfall on the West Midlands. Our flood model had never seen these rivers, or any data after 2019.
Tame at Bescot: predicted peak 28 m³/s (range 18–46). Gauge recorded 27.
No rating curve, no calibration, no FEH. Open rainfall and soils, 622,000 past storms, and how wet the ground was.
Same method beat the national standard on 78% of 69 rivers it had never seen.
Yesterday's summer storm dropped 50 mm or rainfall on the West Midlands. Our flood model had never seen these rivers, or any data after 2019.
Tame at Bescot: predicted peak 28 m³/s (range 18–46). Gauge recorded 27.
No rating curve, no calibration, no FEH. Open rainfall and soils, 622,000 past storms, and how wet the ground was.
Same method beat the national standard on 78% of 69 rivers it had never seen.
Yesterday's summer storm dropped 50 mm or rainfall on the West Midlands. Our flood model had never seen these rivers, or any data after 2019.
Tame at Bescot: predicted peak 28 m³/s (range 18–46). Gauge recorded 27.
No rating curve, no calibration, no FEH. Open rainfall and soils, 622,000 past storms, and how wet the ground was.
Same method beat the national standard on 78% of 69 rivers it had never seen.
Introducing the planetary prediction engine: An experimental research capability that automates global geospatial modeling workflows. From predicting public health outcomes to improving food security, we are simplifying planetary-scale analytics. Learn more: https://t.co/EGhcEMqZxX
Part of me starting to use x now is to get comfortable talking about my work and what I do. It is something of a personal development mission.
The other part is that I'm about to get outed as the author of a very powerful flood model and I can't escape it for much longer 😂
Today I’m going to be shipping hydrometric updates to the method space calculation and more importantly the first version of our new rainfall runoff model with probability banded flows based on catchment shape and description.
I'll be travelling to leeds for the British Hydrological Symposium next week. looking forward to talking about UK hydrology, climate change and open data as it contributes to improved flow prediction!
if reports of a landslide triggering an earthquake triggering a flood are true then I don't know how you string that together to give people sufficient reaction time
This is an urgent transboundary problem. CMA/INSAT ingestion and support from CMA is vital. Nepal does not have the technology to warn of these events.
@jagan_chapagain@IFRC_DREF Very sad to see this. Urgent assistance from CMA is needed and transboundary coopoeration between China via Tibet and Nepal is required. Seismic sensors and a real warning netwrok is no longer optional.
for flooding like this any rainfall triggers are meaningless - 50mm in 24hrs is not a trigger. With a hydrograph at 9m in 30 minutes Nepal needs a different warning modality