@Beesafree Lol did you read my tweet, I specifically said your daily changing logic is why I no longer want to interact with you. Since you don't want to take the hint, a block will do instead.
@Beesafree of what you believe. These flip flops are not what honest people do, it's what people who have a hidden agenda do. You don't behave like someone interested in the truth so I don't see any point in either replying to you further or reading anything more you have to say. Goodbye.
@Beesafree Wait I thought you JUST said you stand by innocent until proven guilty, we don't know. That's what you just said about sf, but now it's without proof it's most likely not true? Someone who actually wanted to find the truth would be impartial, you just can't contain your bias.
@Beesafree I don't think accusing someone of lying is the short version of 'i don't know' and given how quickly you backed off that when the subject was sf you don't seem to think that either. You have revealed that you're treating both sides differently & biased in the favor of your friend
@Beesafree Perfect, I'm glad you admit you understand that concept, this is why treating both sides the same standard is important. Before you said looh didn't provide proof therefore she lied, but now when sf didn't provide proof it means you don't know. Why did you say different before?
@Beesafree I care about treating every case with the same rules rather than giving special treatment to your friends, otherwise you could easily demand something impossible. So to be clear, are you saying you assume that simpleflips lied about every accusation he made?
@Beesafree I just proved you having a double standard. When your friend accuses looh of things you "don't really care" and have no objection to them not being unprovable. Let's suppose that the multiple victims' claims are unprovable to your biased impossible standard.