@bell13401101 Brother, your English spelling and grammar are atrocious. At least TRY to make use of the spell-check feature that’s afforded you for free.
@jasonro54589399@atensnut Jason, 1A allows you to say what you want. It doesn’t protect you from the consequences of what you say.
I’d suggest you actually read and study the Constitution before you start referring to it as if you’re just a parrot.
@AmericaTex4ever @krassenstein Let’s not count our chickens before they hatch @AmericaTex4ever.
Returning the hostages is a win, yes, but it will be a while before you can say peace has been achieved. If you really need to pump trump up, at least choose real things that are firmly established.
@Charlie157874@DanielleA34203 @Notwokenow You have this largely wrong. This sounds like you expressing the incorrect arguments you’ve settled on in your head but I don’t think you’re correct about either of your two ideas.
@DanielleA34203 @Notwokenow I’m afraid it’s you who seems to have never understood her history.
It is discussed in “founding documents”, just not specifically in the Constitution.
However, maybe you should bother to read the 1st amendment which specifically disallows Congress from establishing a religion.
@MAGAMichelleS69 Ur facts are correct. What ur conveniently overlooking is the motive for the decision which is what libs are reacting to. Vengeance is not supposed to be the underlying factor. U know that, but in ur haste to demean the oppositional party, who are NOT ur enemies, you obfuscate.
@NE_VET_GoArmy@JamesTate121 Why would you say nope, especially with such an arrogant attitude, when you haven’t checked the facts? I don’t get that form of defensive obstinance. Facts are not your strength.
@navwig@jrh22aol@NYCityGirl4@DougWahl1 You apparently are not a private business owner. That’s much easier said than done, especially in a skilled field.
@navwig@DougWahl1 You’re a conservative. Didn’t you support allowing a baker to refuse to serve a gay couple because it was not his/her belief?
When you establish a precedent, shouldn’t you have to live with what you created? Or is it all up to your personal opinion?
Much of a hypocrite are you?
@hitmanace18@Haaszelconn14@MAGAVoice That’s because you’re only looking at the crime that lower income people engage in. In your narrow mind, add pedophilia, fraud, embezzlement, tax evasion, rape and other crimes of the wealthy and a different picture emerges.
@Mrpiccolo1980 @GavinNewsom No other prez will get to use the “new plane”. It goes to the trump presidential library. If you’re going to post angry retorts, best to get your facts straight.
@HaroldG16960706@PKBirkmeyer@atensnut Harold, CA supports your state, paying far more into the fed than GA could ever hope to.
Maybe if you were as half as smart as Kamala, and dealt in facts, you wouldn’t still have to work well into your 70’s.
@fargomonkey70@NightKnigh76618@TruthFromEarth@AaronDapperFit@Rightanglenews ps - I am aware that what I posted consists of some generalization so please don’t start nitpicking details. My point was to respond to the person who suggested that the “switch” in parties is a “democrat lie”. They clearly have zero grasp of history. Opinions are not facts.
@fargomonkey70@NightKnigh76618@TruthFromEarth@AaronDapperFit@Rightanglenews The southern states of the 19th century were the slave states. They were dems. The northern states were opposed to slavery. They were repubs.
What is the predominant party of the southern states today? What is the predominant party of the northern states today?
Think it through.