@EUeic Could you indicate how many characters applicants have for each single question? That would be really helpful for those who will only get the go/no go end of May. Thanks.
""L'innovation de rupture ne sort pas de nulle part. Plus encore que l'innovation classique, elle se construit car elle s'ancre typiquement dans 10, 15, 20 ans de R&D."" https://t.co/tVyf1W401T via @lecho
Could you send a tweet once all #EICAccelerator interview invitations have been sent @EUeic ? 4000+ applicants will be disappointed and will want to know too.
@eu_innovconsult@EUeic c) We should be ready to pay evaluators more. The level of expertise required is not trivial and quality has a cost.
I couldn't agree more that "evaluators must be bound to the same levels of excellence as the applicants".
If not, we will be wasting billions.
@eu_innovconsult@EUeic b) Both ERC laureates and @EIF_EU funded business angels and VCs make for a natural pool of deep tech innovation evaluators which should be tapped into. We should use all those whom the European ecosystem has collectively already identified as being excellent.
@eu_innovconsult@EUeic I agree with all recommendations except for 3 points:
a) Your go/no go system at full proposal stage will yield too many short-listed applicants for the interview.I would have 3 evaluators at that stage instead of 2 & require that all 3 score "go" to regulate the interview influx