Losing followers like crazy.
I also didn’t realise I had so many leftist followers.
I didn’t realise wanting my country back was an issue.
The trash really does take itself out.
🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
My 16yr old son finished his first shift at his first job last night. Picked him up at 10pm and he looked beat.
He was a little sad on the way home.
I asked what was wrong.
He said he felt like he’s growing up too fast and that his childhood is over now.
Experience the magic of our Moon mission wherever you go! ✨
Download free, mobile wallpapers and bring your device into the new era of exploration: https://t.co/494ZyUBtve
My child is tired 😭
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎i’ll remind u🥹
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
say hi
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎
I NEED TREATMENT ⭐️✨️
Please don’t ignore this call… Eileen is hungry, and he deserves to live.
https://t.co/XolKMGB0D7
I know the majority of Tottenham fans want Frank out (I do), and it is hard to argue with the emotion behind that view. The football is lifeless, the results are poor, and the sense of drift is unmistakable. It feels like we are sliding rather than building, and that is exhausting to watch week after week.
But once he is gone, what actually happens next. Who do the board turn to, and why should anyone trust that decision. This is the same board that stumbled into Poch, not through vision or planning, but through circumstance. It worked spectacularly, but it was luck rather than strategy, and everything since has underlined that point.
The squad itself is another uncomfortable truth. It is a collection of decent, serviceable players, but it is not a coherent or elite group. It lacks balance, leadership, and quality in key areas. Squad building has never been a particular strength of the club, and the idea that this group is simply being held back by the manager does not really survive scrutiny. We were also fortunate with Kane, a generational talent who emerged unexpectedly and papered over cracks for years. That kind of lightning does not strike twice.
If anyone believes this squad is stronger than it appears, they only need to look at the defensive performances over the past two and a half years. Two managers, same fragility, same confusion, same recurring mistakes. That points to something deeper than coaching alone. It speaks to recruitment, structure, and accountability, none of which feel settled.
So let us assume we sack Frank and aim higher. We appoint a good manager. Where are they coming from, and why would they choose Spurs. Alonso is often mentioned. He is available, highly rated, and on paper looks an ideal fit. But would he really come here and risk the momentum and reputation he has built. Would he trust the board to support him properly, or see Spurs as a potential career trap.
The romantic option is a Poch return, but that raises its own problems. Why would he risk tarnishing his legacy. If it went wrong, the club would look directionless, as if it had run out of ideas and reached for nostalgia. The board may not understand football deeply, but they are not reckless enough to gamble like that lightly.
That is the core frustration. Removing the manager might relieve some pressure, but it does not solve the underlying issues. Without a clear footballing vision, a credible recruitment strategy, and a structure that supports long term success, we are just repeating the same cycle. Change for the sake of change feels cathartic, but it rarely fixes anything at Spurs.
Set to delicates, 30C, rinse and repeat…