the solution to phimosis is often just to stretch the foreskin over time. Surgeons jump to amputation way too soon. Surgery really should never be done for phimosis. That is another misconception. The male foreskin is extremely important for men and should be preserved at all cost.
If the Abrahamic god is real, it sanctioned the genital mutilation of infant boys. Flagrant genital mutilation and rape.
If we can identify the validity of this demon, there is a strong argument to be made for the creation of weapons that can bend time and space to annihilate it.
Only the most submissive, rotten, and diseased of people would kneel to such an entity.
One thing I know for certain is that Intactivists will never really hold anyone accountable for this. They’ll let everyone off the hook and not be involved in helping men get justice the minute this is criminalized.
Intactivists don’t care about justice for men, and they don’t care about disciplining the people responsible for this.
Ironically, those two points are the most persuasive when trying to advocate for criminalization of this practice.
Why not cut the clitorises off these demons in revenge for their participation in the mass amputation of foreskins from infant males? It would be fitting to honor the Abrahamic code of an “eye for an eye”.
@dupays@gao598449064@PSSD_warning@dupays, it’s flagrantly obvious how damaging this is. If you lost this anatomy, you’d suffer terribly, and you come in here and try and diminish it talking out your ass for what reason?
The inner layer of the foreskin is the most erogenous tissue on the penis and the mobility of the foreskin moving up and down is the engine of male sexual stimulation.
It’s a structure that seems like it specifically evolved to facilitate intense sexual pleasure and deep erotic connection.
Historically, I think this is precisely why it was targeted by the Abrahamics (supreme demon people)
They wanted to genitally mutilate children to damage their sexual energy and steer their psychology. In a way, I see them as the defilers of the souls of men, and I feel they’re one of the most supreme threats to ever emerge in the human race.
@dupays Fingertips and inner foreskin both contain Meissner’s corpuscles, but the sensation does not feel the same because the receptors are only the first step.
What matters is where those touch signals are sent and how the brain interprets them.
Fingertip signals mainly travel through hand touch pathways used for grip, texture, pressure, and object detection.
Inner foreskin signals travel through genital sensory pathways that are more closely integrated with arousal, pelvic nerves, autonomic responses, and sexual pleasure circuits.
So the difference is not simply the receptor type but the whole nerve pathway and brain context attached to that tissue.
@dupays@gao598449064@PSSD_warning@dupays as an adult, the presentation often looks like this. Limited to no mobility, all mucosal surfaces exposed, and large portions of the highly erogenous inner foreskin / frenulum amputated.
We should give more consideration to framing routine/ritual infant foreskin amputation as felony sexual battery that can be charged under existing legislation
Every single day I mourn the sexual loss I experience from being subjected to the atrocity of infant foreskin amputation. Every sexual experience I have is tainted and radically diminished and it's so in my face and palpable.
I mourn the person I could have been if I hadn't been subjected to extreme genital torture that permanently changed my psychology and neurological anatomy. For my entire life, my nervous system has been in a constant state of fight or flight. I'm not sure I've ever really experienced a peaceful, at ease state except with the use of drugs.
I can't ever move on from this because of how deeply imprinted it is in my physical body. I feel like this mutilation defines me.
@dupays@RyanShuck5 Do you think a lot of men cut as children retain their full frenulum? Most of have had large portions of it amputated. For me, newly my entire frenulum was amputated.
@dupays I think I see what you’re saying now actually, that you agree the frenulum is the most erogenous structure. I consider that as part of the inner foreskin surface area but it is a distinct and uniquely specialized structure in its own right as well.
You didn’t answer the question I asked. What did I say that was misinformation?
The inner mucosal membrane layer of the foreskin, and particularly the frenular delta/frenulum, is the most erogenous tissue on the penis.
The only other structure in this conversation would be the glans. Are you suggesting that the glans is more erogenous than the inner foreskin? I don’t agree with that, but I think it’s fair to say that the glans and inner foreskin work together for stimulation. On my penis though, the remaining inner foreskin I have left is dramatically more erogenous than the glans is, and I could never stimulate just the glans alone to orgasm. It’s possible there is variation in how nerves/mechanoreceptors are distributed throughout the male penis though.