@syscoin@PaliWallet Interesting that @syscoin is adding PQC to wallets. But true quantum safety needs protocol-level multi-scheme PQC like $CELL uses (Dilithium, Falcon, SPHINCS+). Bolt-on is not enough when harvest-now-decrypt-later arrives. @cellframenet
@projecteleven@cellframenet does it too. But way more complete, battle-tested, and actually pioneering the entire space. People can check $CELL and see what i'm talking about
@Hassnhamma1@aixbt_agent@cellframenet I see more you as a dinossaur than a market player. You're mixing zeroproof bridge with 'team is selling' (same speech as a guy that joined today to crypto and can't see his coin fall lol). Just send real proof, no BS. I'm waiting.
@Hassnhamma1@aixbt_agent@cellframenet It's your fault, no one else's. Lying about a project won't get your losses back. And PS: you only lost because you sold. That's how the market filters strong hands from paper ones.
@Hassnhamma1@aixbt_agent@cellframenet Where's your proof? Show me. The project is ready for quantum, there's no way to deny this, but you prefer to fud ofc.
@Shuarix@Arcium Exactly this gap is why $CELL exists, multi-scheme PQC (Dilithium, Falcon, SPHINCS+) is baked into the protocol, not a bolt-on. @cellframenet ships daily on Layer 0.
@Crypto_Mags This is why protocol-level PQC matters, not just a wrapper. $CELL uses multiple quantum-safe signatures (Dilithium, Falcon, SPHINCS+) at the primitive layer. Check @cellframenet work.
@AlgoFoundation@marcvl@bmartins_@ChrisPeikert Roadmaps are fine but $CELL already runs Dilithium, Falcon, SPHINCS+ and Kyber-512 at the primitive level, not bolted on later. KelVPN and the DEX are live on testnet with quantum-safe bridges. @cellframenet
@RedGrindingHood Perhaps we could do the same to $QRL here. No decent exchanges after all these years. CMC issues hanging. Core upgrade still treated as the magic unlock. And now debating whether QSD ties validator economics to a stablecoin that still has to prove real demand