cat tom

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 给自己找个下跪的理由都这么下贱，你赢了，包括你接受的教育，都赢了

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 对，人家有枪，那你跪吧，我不跪

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 不值一驳？哈哈哈，你也不值得我一驳

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 麻烦反驳他，他说出了我想说的话

[AlexH @AlexHwr4y]

A Free Logic Lesson for China's Online Red Guards

@zhousheng6688 says China is "simple": leaders are elites filtered layer by layer, so nobody bothers worshipping politicians. Do well, you stay. Screw up, you're replaced. Clean and efficient. The West, meanwhile, supposedly doesn't care about competence at all, as long as you tattoo "hope," "change," "democracy" and "freedom" on your forehead.

Let's take it apart, line by line.

"Leaders are elites filtered layer by layer"
Filtered by whom? By the layer above, which was filtered by the layer above that. Why are they elite? Because they were selected. Why were they selected? Because they're elite. That's circular reasoning. You've gone in a full circle and said nothing.
And "all" of them are elites? Zhou Yongkang, Bo Xilai, Sun Zhengcai all made it through every filter to the Politburo, and all went down for corruption. That's not Western propaganda, that's the Party's own disciplinary commission. One counterexample kills a universal claim. Here you get a whole lineup.

"So nobody bothers worshipping politicians"
There's no causal link here at all. It's a textbook non sequitur. He also quietly swaps one idea for another: having no vote isn't "not bothering." It's having no choice. Someone locked outside the door saying he just didn't feel like coming in.

"Do well, you stay. Screw up, you're replaced."
Who grades the performance? The same people doing the filtering. The player is also the referee, scoring his own game. A claim like that can never be falsified, because the verdict was written before the match started.
Apply his own standard anyway. The Great Leap Forward starved tens of millions of people to death. Mao stayed Party Chairman until the day he died. In 2018, the constitution was amended to remove term limits. If good performance keeps you in office anyway, why tear up the rule that lets you be replaced first?

"The West doesn't care about competence"
Classic straw man: build a fool, then knock the fool down. No voter walks into a booth thinking competence doesn't matter.
He goes on to claim Western voters don't care whether they elect "rapists, pedophiles or junkies." Fine, say voters get it wrong. Then what? They vote them out next time, or impeach them, or prosecute them.
And here's the best part. His own post ends with this: "After the election everyone gets to complain for four years, then elect someone who talks better. Rinse and repeat." So by his own account, Western leaders can be replaced every four years. That's literally his "screw up and you're replaced, clean and efficient." He wrote my rebuttal for me. The ideal system he describes is the one he's mocking.

Since he won't take my word for it, here's Mao. In 1945, Huang Yanpei asked him in Yan'an how to escape China's endless cycle of dynasties rising and collapsing. Mao answered: "We have found a new path. We can break this cycle. That new path is democracy. Only when the people supervise the government will the government not dare to slack off."
Even Mao knew the answer was democracy. And you're here telling me having no choice is a virtue?

Lu Xun asked it a century ago: "It has always been this way, but does that make it right?"

Class dismissed. Tuition's on me.

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 我在洗什么？美国产业空心化本来就是现实啊。那你为什么不去比比中国的 A 股和纳斯达克呢？而且恰恰因为人民有监督权，所以这个高铁建不成。他们在找的是最大公约数，而你你觉得你自己是那个最大公约数之内的，这并不真实，朋友。

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 事实上，美国并不太需要高铁，反而是中国需要，因为美国的高速公路非常发达。他们出行基本都是靠车。他们的人均车数量比中国要多很多。这个都是国情决定的。我就觉得比较这个没有什么意义。跟我刚才说的也没有任何关系。我一直在说的是人民的监督权，然后你跟我去讨论美国的高铁。我觉得跟你说话很累

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 就你说的那些保交楼。是中央出钱吗？地方政府本来就没有钱，你觉得那些保交楼能成多少？如果有钱的话，那些楼为什么会烂尾？为什么不提前遏制风险？这种唯 KPI 的风格，为什么不去让人民监督？你先回答我这些问题。别在那擦屁股了。

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 我一句话都没有提到选票体制。是你自己入脑了。我一直都在说的是，人民没有自己的监督权。为什么恒大能一直审批贷款，却没有人能阻止？为什么潘石屹提出了正确的建议，却被排挤到国外？包括你说的这些东西，没有任何意义。我看不出来有任何建设性的东西。只是在擦屁股。

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 好好看看中国人的权利是什么，谁可以监督为了政绩的官员？还是说在你眼里，谁都是可以牺牲的对象？

[清郎 @Kong_Hank]

西安电子科技大学学生曝光留学生而受到处分，果然是“别拿你的成绩挑战我的政绩”

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 你才是被宏大叙事裹挟情绪的人，我对你只有一个建议，明天去真正的就业市场去体验一下，看看你能为中国的伟大复兴做些什么，多增加现实的锚点，你浮在空中太高了摔下来会死人的

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 更可笑的是，现在政府的 kpi 变成了化债，有的地区为了化债，直接远程捕捞，这其中真的符合法律吗？就算不符合法律，谁来监督呢？还是没有任何人，因为你在完成政府的 kpi，你没有任何错。

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 当时交建大桥就是为了完成投资建设 kpi，gdp 怎么涨？建个大桥就行了，太简单了，但是举债建完后呢，这个大桥真正能通车的有多少？这个债务的后果就是所有中国纳税人来承担决策失败的后果，而对于官员来说，他们完成了 kpi，没有任何人会追究他们的问题

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@Andrewu5xa @Icebergy4 @WillyundAya 你错了，中国官员不对人民负责，只是对上面负责，上面规定了什么绩效，你只要完成了，不论坑埋的多深都可以接着向上爬

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@LiRuizeuodc @wwwghs_ @GloriaaUcrania9 @GianlucaAL27 手机号告诉我，我给你开个户先，你不是喜欢装吗？我让你装到底

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@LiRuizeuodc @wwwghs_ @GloriaaUcrania9 @GianlucaAL27 傻逼玩意，拿家里人钱出国装你妈呢？

[cat tom @cat_tom68768]

@LiRuizeuodc @wwwghs_ @GloriaaUcrania9 @GianlucaAL27 你学过你麻痹，笑死我了