@CishetKris That confuses divine perfection with created perfection. Only God is absolutely perfect. Creatures can be perfect according to their nature and end. Existence is not harmful: being itself is good, while evil is the privation of a good that ought to exist.
@RevIsaacWirtz@SipsWithSerra Right but they commission actual scientists and specialists in the certain field. Places like Lourdes went many trials of investigation where the bishop kept saying there was not sufficient enough proof.
@DropOutDylan@orngteam@adevarat_iacob@SAfrikaCath Calling it “symbolic” does not by itself make it invalid. The minister need not correctly understand Baptism’s effects; he must intend to perform Christian baptism doing what the Church does. If true water and the Trinitarian form were used, don’t presume it invalid.
@ascent_of It was back when it was still fairly small. They reached out to the society for confirmations. They were willing to support them but they would have to behind celebrate the latin mass. They didn't call back after that. Instead found a old Catholic fraud
@GMErectheus@BobertMack A bit of a contradiction as currently Rome says all have a say in what the Church does. So I ask you be more Synodal because you might fall into the sin of rigidity.
@GMErectheus@BobertMack That "blessing" is truly just stupid in the grand scheme of things. It's the communion line not the blessing line. Its just a weak attempt to "include" everyone just go to confession