@Miabella4u@ProsecutorsPod But his question was literally if Dr. H agreed with what Red had just asked him. Also didn’t let him finish over the DA’s objection. So yet again sided with Red and treated a CW witness like they were being difficult.
@Miabella4u@ProsecutorsPod I’m sure there’s more, but Red was intentionally being unclear with his wording and then refusing to clarify what he was actually asking. Sullivan stepped in and when the doctor said he was confused (by Red’s wording) Sullivan snapped at him “my question isn’t confusing!”
@JohnPaulFAL@JoePops_ I wonder if his little schtick of using endearing (?) old man terminology for things (“television” for telehealth thru a computer, “beach blanket body”, etc.) will end up working against him for this exact reason.
@cactusncookies Disagree. The title identifies a specific issue a mom may be struggling with. Why make it harder to find a resource? Also, here’s an example of the scary thoughts they’re talking about. They’re not saying that 90% of women have thoughts of murdering their kids.
@justacloudpuppy She’s allowed to have baby photo albums and that stupid box with affirmations on it in front of her every day, have a priest sit with her family in the gallery, wear her giant cross necklace, and wail thru testimony, but her own words about her religion are unfair to her.
@gallowsglowup@jkr0llins Somehow “it’s a yes or no question” is the rudest thing people have ever heard when the DA says it, but Reddington can say he doesn’t care and walk off in the middle of an answer and they think it’s hilarious.
@crystaljpropes@JusticeServedTV Pat called her at 5:33 and she called him back at 5:34. It makes sense that the stairs at 5:33 were her coming up from the basement, and the stairs at 5:38 were her going upstairs.
@deardatingb@NancyEllenShel1@ProsecutorsPod And then he said that was another inconsistency, bc she told Resnick that she knew it was legally wrong but felt she was morally right. That’s why he wanted to skip that slide.
@LovesOezge@ProsecutorsPod On direct, Red objected to the DA moving on before Mack was finished with his answer, judge orders her to let him finish. On cross, DA objects to the same exact thing, Mack looks at judge to see how he’ll rule, judge screams at him to stop looking at him and listen to Red.
@UniverslPatriot@Morrigan_Astro What’s your point? She just finished testifying in LC’s defense and made it clear that she supports her. I don’t agree with her stance, but I also don’t find it weird that she would acknowledge LC on the way out.
@MamaLama43@steele_ric56543 His mom had the most batshit defense attorney I’ve ever seen. Even Larry Nassar distanced himself from her bc she’s so despicable.
@peachesinPA@WomanDefiner Her arraignment was also literally the day after this call took place. No wonder Redd was so desperate to discredit the idea that Zeizel told her to claim she heard a voice. The timeline makes it so obvious.
@defundthedmv Also important to note that her phone call to PC where she told him about “the voice” and her “moment of psychosis” happened literally the day before her arraignment. No wonder Redd was so concerned about getting ahead of the theory that Zeizel gave her that idea.
@kallieswfla@Skipvue Even though she prescribed 4 different meds in 4 days, including an antidepressant. It undermines their entire argument about the other providers.
@JohnDePetroshow 0%. Turns out that the phone call to tell Patrick about the “voice” for the first time happened THE DAY BEFORE her arraignment. How convenient that Red’s longtime buddy stopped by to let her use his phone to soft launch her bullshit right before her 1st court appearance.
@factsdontlie10@Lillyin_London I went back and watched her arraignment, and it turns out that the phone call to Patrick where she told him about “the voice” for the first time was THE DAY BEFORE. How convenient that Zeizel showed up with his phone just in time for her to soft launch her bullshit before court