6/x "SUM" by @catnipsIII creates clever, tongue-in-cheek, random collages of hieroglyphic-like symbols that prompt the viewer to question their own definition of eroticism and sexual orientation.
https://t.co/jeFFdSYLzF
"SUM #88"
@WaitingToSign For sure it’s tangible, and I love the plotter, but still programmed, acts as a bionic arm. Journey is mentally similar in coding but diff result, but is it traditional? I suppose the most physical human parts we implement to the plotter is choosing/placing paper pen width color
Was listening to another episode @WaitingToSign about traditional artist coming into nfts and started thinking about maybe generative artists going into traditional art… just been thinking about the reasons it seems less likely and what that might mean…
I’m floored by Trinity and WillPOP’s comments and analysis on SUM. They select different artists’ works to talk and think about. Thank you for your insight on SUM in the Favorite Mint category and using a type of gut/soul in connecting with every project you raise. 🧵 👇
…#4 which is just a couple of—two feet, hand, and a hint of a possible circular breast, it’s just, it cracks me up. I just think it’s so fun and I love it”
SUM by @catnipsIII sticks out because of the clean pictographic visuals.
8 symbols (deliberately left undefined) represent whatever body parts the viewer wants; I had lots of fun imagining titles for all the results!
Mint still open, 256 ed./6 $XTZ
https://t.co/H5oLXOV1rD