Voting has consequences. Canada voted for socialism, higher taxes, more regulations, less freedom.
Business investors decided to go elsewhere.
This is why Canada would be ranked near the bottom compared to every state in the USA.
@NateGearySports I will say it again. Nate has a brilliant sports mind. But is a political neophyte, like an ignorant sports fan making crazy comments but they think they are brilliant.
@PacificMist And that’s why it will it pass. The Globalists (Dems and Rhinos) cannot afford it. It would kill their chances of a NGO run world that they control.
@fightfan213@patmahomelover@NFLonFOX It’s called Basking in Reflected Glory (BIRGing) Because unfortunately people tie their own identity to the success of someone else or a team. Usually it comes from their own insecurity.
You can show this to people that “follow the science” and they still won’t believe it. The human desire to be right and justified controls many people.
🚨 BOMBSHELL FROM JAPAN — THEY CAN’T HIDE THIS ANYMORE
Professor Robert Clancy just dropped the receipts:
A massive Japanese study tracking 20 MILLION people found that ALL excess deaths were in the vaccinated group.
The unvaccinated group? ZERO excess deaths. And here’s the killer detail: mortality surges exactly 3 months after every booster — with peak deaths hitting around 100 days post-vaccination.
The pattern is undeniable. In my opinion, they can no longer suppress the information on the COVID vaccine. The data is out. The cover-up is crumbling. The world needs to see this.
The Founder of Shopify,
One of the smartest& wealthiest Canadian,
CORRECTLY points out, that there’s a Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) in Canada.
“The obvious way for prosperity here is to build the sh*t out of pipelines,
build the sh*t out of our industry,
get resources that everyone needs…
We have the most educated workforce on planet earth.”
Not a single lie was told.
How can you not love Tobi
Honest. Pragmatic. Centred.
@PacificMist Too soon to know. The imperialists / globalists have a lot of fight left. They have centuries behind them. It will matter who takes over from Trump to carry on the fight.
@PacificMist@BasedMikeLee@Chiefmac3500 Why is this surprising? Trump is the mortal enemy to globalists. Of course they won’t acknowledge it. He has ruined their decades of planning.
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
@Houseofyogi@WallStreetMav And when have outcomes improved with state intervention? History shows the more govt, the more corruption, the more freedoms are taken away, and more poverty is created. It creates victim citizens.