stop giving GrokBot more questions
give it something to take off your plate
100 tasks you can delegate:
→ research
→ content
→ operations
→ analysis
→ communication
→ coding
→ monitoring
→ support
→ planning
→ creative
plus a prompt formula, automation ideas and approval checkpoints
100 tasks
10 categories
one sheet
save this before you do the next task yourself ↓
Paste once. Basically a five-check read-only phone audit.
Claude Code in read-only mode. Own device. Nothing written.
The prompt drops. Five passes fire in sequence:
→ WALK starts with every installed app, hidden ones included. One case out there: an app disguised as "System Service," no icon, no store listing, location pinged every 2 minutes for 11 weeks, per a posted walkthrough
→ EXPOSE pulls configuration profiles on iPhone, device-admin and accessibility on Android. Who installed each, what it controls
→ CATCH flags any app holding always-on location, mic or camera it does not need
→ HUNT maps anything relaunching on boot or connecting to raw IPs on a fixed schedule
→ DROP. One verdict line: clean or compromised. Three sorted lists: Safe. Worth removing. Needs a professional
Each flag carries severity: low, medium or high. What it reaches, how long it has been active, where it sends data.
Skip the boundary and you burn the evidence. The five passes work because nothing writes to the phone. What the session reads depends on the access you provide.
If something hits the last list: screenshot first, passwords from a different device, professional before deletion.
The terminal below walks the five passes to the verdict ↓
THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE GOLDMINE FOR REVERSE ENGINEERING
people are decompiling 30-year-old games with Claude, and almost nobody checks if the output matches the binary.
The idea: three Claude models share one set of evidence files, and the original binary decides who’s correct. No address, xref or test log means the claim stays UNKNOWN.
You start with a tiny C file where you already know every answer:
cc -O2 -o samples/record samples/record.c
here’s who does what:
→ Sonnet 5.5 ($2/$10) maps the binary into function_map.md
→ Opus 5.5 ($4/$20) rebuilds the tricky functions with 2 competing readings
→ the original binary runs the tests and logs them to evidence/
→ Fable 5.1 ($10/$50) only reviews a theory that already passed
the trap this catches:
→ Claude sees the checksum loop and calls it CRC32
→ the constants 2166136261 and 16777619 say FNV-1a
→ only a run against the binary proves which one
100K in + 10K out costs about $0.30 on Sonnet, $0.60 on Opus and $1.50 on Fable. Most people burn their Fable money on stuff Sonnet handles fine.
the full tree
CLAUDE.md sets the rules (OBSERVED / INFERRED / UNKNOWN)
Sonnet 5.5 maps the binary
Opus 5.5 writes the spec, 2 readings and minimum tests
the original binary runs the tests
Fable 5.1 reviews only if both readings survive
Sonnet 5.5 turns the proven spec into code
paste the tree and this prompt into Claude Code ↓
“Set up a reverse engineering workflow from this tree:
Create CLAUDE.md. Every claim follows CLAIM | EVIDENCE | CONFIDENCE | HOW TO VERIFY and is tagged OBSERVED, INFERRED or UNKNOWN.
On Sonnet 5.5, inventory [BINARY] into notes/function_map.md with ADDRESS | NAME | PROPOSED_ROLE | EVIDENCE | CONFIDENCE.
On Opus 5.5, reconstruct [FUNCTION] into notes/spec.md with two interpretations and the minimum tests that separate them.
Run the tests against the original binary and log every result in evidence/.
If both readings survive, ask Fable 5.1 for the 3 highest-impact ways the spec could be wrong.
Show me the function map first and wait for my go.”
bookmark this, you’ll need it later.
THIS IS F*CKING GOLD: 100 CLAUDE SKILLS ON 1 SCREEN
767K+ GITHUB STARS. ALL FREE. SAVE YOUR AI COURSE MONEY
a cheat sheet for everything you can teach Claude to do
10 categories covering collections, memory, workflow, marketing, design, data, security, docs, dev and automation
the skills worth grabbing first:
→ everything-claude-code, 219k stars, a giant pack of ready skills
→ ui-ux-pro-max-skill, 95k, for cleaner design
→ claude-mem, 84k, gives Claude a memory between chats
→ superpowers by obra, 42k, a full workflow for coding
→ obsidian-skills, 36k, connects Claude to your notes
→ marketingskills, 35k, for marketing work
→ planning-with-files, 24k, keeps plans in files so Claude does not lose track
the useful part:
only 14 of the 100 are official from Anthropic: docx, pdf, pptx, xlsx, skill-creator and more
the other 86 come from the community
start with the official ones for daily work
use community packs to explore what else Claude can do
the workflow:
pick a skill → read its SKILL.md → install it → give Claude a real task → keep it or delete it
the 3 i would try first:
→ skill-creator, so Claude builds new skills for you
→ claude-mem, so it stops forgetting you
→ superpowers, if you write code
save this, then pick 3 and test them this week
agent code sat on bare metal long enough
Perplexity open-sourced SPACE Oct 15. Millions of sandbox runs daily per Perplexity.
10 open-source GitHub repos that jail your agent's code:
96,151 stars, Oct 18. 9 Apache-2.0. All pushed since Oct 14.
JAIL THE PROCESS
01. sandbox-runtime ★5,577: https://t.co/zSI3arkjA6 → OS-level process limits
02. bubblewrap ★9,104: https://t.co/sICuAxgZdL → unprivileged namespace sandbox
03. gvisor ★19,702: https://t.co/h8MeMb2OUX → user-space kernel isolation
BOOT A DISPOSABLE VM
04. firecracker ★37,461: https://t.co/5ceaps6QlG → lightweight KVM microVMs
05. kata-containers ★8,960: https://t.co/kXiA15eZ8C → VM-isolated container runtime
06. libkrun ★2,794: https://t.co/aBgT3enVxz → embeddable in-process VM
07. smolvm ★6,759: https://t.co/8BcBuXA2K2 → branchable microVMs, sub-second (README)
SERVE SANDBOXES TO AGENTS
08. SPACE ★1,470: https://t.co/xE5roziPGa → Firecracker sandbox HTTP API
09. infra ★1,739: https://t.co/J2XHcjSWLT → E2B self-hosted runtime
10. boxlite ★2,585: https://t.co/zYK7v7DDW8 → five-language micro-VM SDK
the stack:
code → jail → kernel → microVM → API → fork → resume
egress and credentials need their own layer
not the model. the jail under it ⭣