मैं आपसे कह रहा था कि पवन खेड़ा जी @Pawankhera को राज्यसभा भेजकर कांग्रेस ने संघ और बीजेपी का पूरा इंतजाम कर दिया है। सुनिए केवल 1 मिनट 59 सेकेंड में इन्होंने संघ की पूरी बखिया उधेड़ दी है। पवन जी का ग़ुस्सा वाजिब है। कैसे तुमने ठेकेदारी ले ली हिंदू धर्म की भाई? कौन हो तुम? सुनिए सुनिए और तेवर देखिए -
VIDEO | Delhi: During a press conference, Congress leader Pawan Khera (@Pawankhera) says, “BJP say they don’t need Muslim votes, and many have repeated this. If that’s the case, Muslims look at other parties, whether it’s Badruddin Ajmal’s party, Asaduddin Owaisi’s party, or a national secular party. Muslims rejected the BJP, and also rejected so-called Muslim parties, and chose a secular party instead. Yet there are still complaints about that. I don’t understand why votes are being given colors, saffron, green, blue. Even talking about the proportion of Hindu and Muslim MLAs makes me uncomfortable, but we are forced to discuss it in today’s time…Is this the language of the Constitution? Does this kind of political culture align with Ambedkar’s Constitution?”
(Full video available on PTI Videos - https://t.co/bIyFWTfmBd)
I travelled through Great Nicobar today.
These are the most extraordinary forests I have ever seen in my life. Trees older than memory. Forests that took generations to grow.
The people on this island are equally beautiful - both the adivasi communities and the settlers - but they are being robbed of what is rightfully theirs.
The government calls what it is doing here a “Project.” What I have seen is not a project. It is millions of trees marked for the axe. It is 160 square kilometres of rainforest condemned to die. It is communities that have been ignored while their homes have been snatched away.
This is not development. This is destruction dressed in development’s language.
So I will say it plainly, and I will keep saying it: what is being done in Great Nicobar is one of the biggest scams and gravest crimes against this country’s natural and tribal heritage in our lifetime.
It must be stopped. And it can be stopped - if Indians choose to see what I have seen.
@PsychoSainik@ChennaiIPL@BCCI Shame on you Chennai. From the land of Periyar its difficult to believe such a complaint alleging black magic. Rise up and play your natural game. Dont go behind these stuffs
From 2013 onwards, they launched a multi-million-dollar campaign to portray someone as Pappu and another as a hero. Karma had different plans. One single comedian became the David that pricked the Goliath!
Political battle must be fought on issues like anti-corruption drive, health facilities, right to education, industry, farmers welfare & protection,but its being fought on religion,caste,creed & division.Even after 79 years of Independence, we failed to rise above petty politics
Breaking 🔥
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala: On US-Israel-Iran war, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says,
"What Modi has done remains a historical blunder, you can't make friends with declining powers and expect India to go ahead. The global South is a reality, China, Russia and Pakistan are now more closer than ever."
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘶𝘦𝘻 𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘬𝘦 : 𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘕𝘦𝘩𝘳𝘶 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘕𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘳 𝘓𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘎𝘰𝘢
While current events highlight the diplomatic miscalculations that leave us vulnerable today, years ago, a Prime Minister who never claimed the title of 𝘝𝘪𝘴𝘸𝘢𝘨𝘶𝘳𝘶 played his cards with a precision that ultimately secured Goa.
The liberation of Goa in 1961 is often remembered as a swift 36-hour military strike, in reality, it was a diplomatic masterstroke executed in the waters of the Middle East. At its heart was a "brotherhood of defiance" between Indian PM Jawaharlal Nehru and Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser.
By 1961, Portugal’s dictator, António de Oliveira Salazar, refused to budge on Goa, Daman, and Diu, dismissively labeling them "overseas provinces." As India prepared Operation 𝘝𝘪𝘫𝘢𝘺, a massive strategic shadow loomed: Portugal was a NATO member. Had Lisbon rushed warships and reinforcements from Europe, a local liberation could have spiraled into a global maritime conflict.
The foundation for 1961 was laid during the 1956 Suez Crisis. When Western powers attacked Egypt to reclaim the canal, Nehru risked India’s ties with the UK to stand firmly with Nasser. Nehru viewed the 1956 invasion not merely as a local conflict, but as the "dying gasp of Western imperialism." He was blunt, stating,"It was Israel which attacked Egypt. The guilty party is the Israeli government and not Egypt." By championing Egypt’s sovereignty at the UN, Nehru cemented his role as the definitive voice of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). Nasser never forgot that when Egypt was under fire, India was its most vocal shield.
When India finally moved on Goa in December 1961, it was time for Nasser’s payback. The shortest route for Portuguese reinforcements was through the Suez Canal. Nehru reached out to Nasser, and the gates were effectively slammed shut. Under the guise of international protocols regarding "arms in conflict zones," Egypt denied passage to Portuguese ships carrying troops. Other vessels faced a gauntlet of endless administrative red tape and "technicalities." Without the Suez, Portugal’s reinforcements were forced to circumnavigate Africa,a journey far too slow to intercept India’s advance.
With the "back door" closed, the Indian Armed Forces moved with overwhelming speed. Lacking any hope of reinforcements, Governor General Vassalo e Silva signed the instrument of surrender on December 19, 1961. Thus, 451 years of Portuguese rule ended in less than two days.
Throughout this process, Nehru refused to bow to US President John F. Kennedy, British PM Harold Macmillan, or UN Secretary-General U Thant,all of whom had "advised" him to postpone action. The "Suez Blockade" remains a masterclass in foreign policy. Nehru’s defense of Egypt in 1956 wasn't just based on idealism; it was a long term strategic alignment. By cultivating deep ties with the Arab world, Nehru ensured that when India moved to complete its independence, it did so with the silent, decisive support of the world’s most vital waterway.
It is easy to belittle a figure like Nehru today, but it is far harder to emulate him. True leadership requires more than just chest-thumping; it requires the foresight to move the world's gears in your favor.
#JawaharlalNehru
Never supported Israel (20 marks)
Never believed Netanyahu (20 marks)
Never trusted Trump (20 marks)
Never supported wars (20 marks)
Always supported Palestine (20 marks)
What's your score out of 100? 🔥