@soph8873@RapSheet It sounds like suppl. drafts arent a common thing. Its for extenuating circumstances. The league doesnt want top tier kids with college eligibility remaining to wait until after the traditional draft to declare so they can avoid the bad teams who have the top picks.
@JLK7299@AndyStaples The lockout would be illegal collusion. The leagues can only coordinate their employment/payment actions after there is a union to bargain against.
Thats one of many reasons why a union is a bad idea for blue chip players.
@GrandBeggar@hollowearthterf I didnt misunderstand. I'm explaining the same phenomenon that you are explaining.
"Healthy at any size" is a fringe movement on the left. Some on the right conflated this with the mainstream "body positivity" movement bc both forbid you calling an obese person unhealthy.
@hollowearthterf I loved that Obama did that. But I'm not a right-winger. You inaccurately lumped me in with them simply because I added nuance to your characterization.
Similarly, many on the right inaccurately lumped all of the left in with the "healthy at any size" contingent.
@devvvvsss@PeteThamel As an sdsu alum and season ticket holder, I say I hate that idea. I dont want home games at 10pm on a Tuesday. Football is for Saturdays.
Plus, fcs is still college football like it used to be. Its not as beholden to media $, and its not a professional league.
@gojacksdallas@_undertherock_ Minnesota is a hockey state. At my kids' HS more ppl go to hockey games than football.
I dont think its a zero sum game in terms of interest. SDSU basketball probably has more fans bc football is successful. However, its a bit of a zero sum game for NIL $. Hard to fund 2 sports.
@newcomeforgov Why would i bother? Reread your post. "So in my world, when you see something thatโs blatantly racist, or wrong, you call it out. But in the political world..."
Nobody in the non-politics real world calls out every morally wrong thing they see. This isn't The Scarlett Letter.
@newcomeforgov Wait, your platform as an independent candidate is that there is not ENOUGH name-calling in party politics? You're trying to reform the system by advocating for more meaningless accusations, with a special focus in guilt by association?
Bold strategy.