This kind of high value woman in modernity ? Low chance 🤣
Nowadays they were just making excuses about gender, age gap, and being promiscuity without boundaries.
Wtf is going on...
• $1B extracted by trading bots
• $3B extracted by PumpFun
• $4B extracted by meme coins on Solana
• $0 given back, even from one single platform
Who do you think shuts down next?
> announces layoffs 2 days before earnings
> blames it all on AI
> earnings come out and they miss EPS by 4000%
> that is 4 followed by 3 0s
hyperliquid
If you traded on @Backpack in 2024 and did $10M volume you got ~$520 via $BP airdrop and that was the maximum you could get, even if you did everything perfect.
But if you were “this stupid” and traded on @HyperliquidX in 2024 with $10M in volume, you got ~3040 points (~$720k).
This aged well, mr Armani.
Centralization in crypto was exposed 🚨
Here’s what is happening:
More than $1,500,000,000 in funds have been frozen since 2025
across USDT, USDC and other tokens
By issuers
- Tether
- Circle
- centralized contracts
This is how it works:
- Stablecoins are not decentralized
- They are controlled by companies
- They include admin functions
- They can block any wallet at any time
Main mechanisms:
- blacklist addresses
- freeze balances instantly
- block transfers
- in some cases, destroy funds
Scale of what’s happening:
- 2025 → ~$900M+ frozen or affected
- 2026 → $500M+ already
- total → $1.5B+ across major cases
2025
Bybit hack → $1.5B involved, partial freezes
Cetus exploit → $200M, delayed response
GMX exploit → $9M not frozen
WLFI freezes Justin Sun’s tokens (~$9M+)
Circle criticized for inaction
~$420M not frozen across multiple cases
Tether takes opposite approach, freezes hundreds of millions proactively
2026
January
- Tether freezes $182M
March
- Circle freezes 16 wallets
- includes legitimate businesses
April 1
Drift hack → $280M
$232M in USDC not frozen in time
April 21
- Arbitrum freezes ~$71M linked to exploit
April 23
- Tether freezes $344M on Tron
largest single freeze ever
Reality is crypto ≠ fully decentralized
the infrastructure is decentralized
the assets are not
This doesn’t have to be a bad thing if there is consensus and it’s used to prevent a greater harm
But it’s worth paying attention to
Two weeks ago, when Drift was exploited for $280M, @aave founder Stani publicly mocked them, saying “this is not DeFi”
In a twist of irony, today AAVE has been hit for $280M+ with the same method, likely by the same attackers...
Karma is real. Grave dancing is bad. 🤯
A summary of the RAVE -95% price fluctuation from $26 to $1 over the past 24 hours.
RAVE Timeline: April 18, 2026
7:26 am UTC: I posted a call to action for Binance, Bitget, & Gate to investigate RAVE market manipulation and offered a $10K bounty.
10:56 am UTC: I posted an update increasing the bounty to $25K.
11:18 am UTC: Bitget publicly acknowledged the call to action.
2:08 pm UTC: Binance publicly acknowledged the call to action.
3:06 pm UTC: RaveDAO posted claiming they have no involvement.
4:19 pm UTC: Gate publicly acknowledged the call to action.
In the days leading up, on April 13 & 14, I confronted RaveDAO co-founder Yemu Xu (wildwoomoo) but have yet to receive an answer.
RAVE launched in Dec 2025 on Binance Alpha with a 1B total supply. The addresses below, linked to the initial distribution, control ~95% of the RAVE supply (h/t Mlm):
0x9831156F1a6E506Fca41503590b42F07c2e80f54
0x8Ed6245C3276307E1A9D9Dc872E98A0E770070fd
0x6020656d1EF182173E45D4Fc375BDD5a48c674B0
0x2664cB80a5ee7D8EC05fe7C752dD62E078056E6d
0x2D81F8AeBf3e58A5e638006c9fd8F38C5220ecab
0x31694d761A8e851cFFbCd286aC54D01e5Ce5aFe6
0x0A1F07993a51CcEb4f52CA67765AECeADDA790d7
0xEB74Df8588cFC1C179Df4bd96C0bB8B227B9bE92
0x53d7d52301366DC14E1916b14eFeC1aDD8F3487b
I found suspicious CEX activity in April 2026 tied to RaveDAO team addresses onchain, which potentially contradicts their recent statement:
Bitget
0x2dc20f2180582172f5450c5d71e23fa438a7031b
0xa3a02aeb97fc1737c66f50d07d024799c137891d
0x2d95eb42525e6087e0cb7869f98da6838ed2e743
Gate
0x31711246b05d71e9eda5e38a3abb654020ee3353
Given the supply concentration, the team at minimum knows who is responsible for this price action.
A simple litmus test: $6B in market cap was wiped out on just $52M of 24hr liquidations (h/t CoinGlass). That ratio points to a manipulated and unsustainable valuation.
RAVE is not the only token with manipulation we have seen on major centralized exchanges. It's just the most blatant, reaching a top 15 market cap within 10 days before dropping 95% in hours.
Other projects with highly questionable price action recently include: SIREN, MYX, COAI, M, PIPPIN, RIVER.
Exchanges need faster intervention on manipulation. Detection at scale isn't easy, but each day of delay means retail traders absorb losses while platforms collect fees on the volume. The outcome is the same regardless of intent.
While it's good the exchanges responded, I find it unlikely this activity wasn't spotted internally before I raised it publicly.
I recognize how much this behavior takes from retail traders, and I plan to investigate similar movements in hopes of identifying the responsible parties.
I want to reiterate that I did not take a position. If I had, I would have been liquidated myself. I also could not anticipate if or when the exchanges would comment publicly.
My $25K bounty will remain active since the only DMs received were unverified claims rather than non-public information with supporting evidence as requested.
I typically ignore all these false claims attacks. But...
You can apologize now. I am officially divorced.
I won't post any legal docs online, as I respect privacy of my ex-wife, and I appreciate the time we spent together.
I am happy to bet $1 billion USD (or any number you choose) that: I am officially divorced (way before today).
If you agree to take the bet, we can get lawyers to validate my divorce agreement, which should be dead simple.
This bet offer is valid permanently, whenever you feel ready. But if you don't take it within 24hrs, it clearly shows who has been mis-representing to the public.
Moving on to better things to do.
CZ launched his book “Freedom of Money” today
The same day, Star Xu (the founder of OKX) called him a liar in public
Here’s what’s actually going on:
CZ’s book brings up a war that started in 2015 at OKCoin
He claims competitors spent years spreading FUD to slow Binance down
Star clearly didn’t like that
So he fired back with a personal accusation:
“CZ has been telling the public he’s divorced
but there’s no proof his Binance equity was legally separated from his ex-wife”
He pointed to a 2023 court letter where CZ was still listed as “husband”
CZ’s response: “I am officially divorced”
Said he wouldn’t post documents out of respect for his ex-wife.
Then offered a $1 billion bet to prove it
Gave Star 24 hours to accept
Star’s counter: produce a divorce agreement signed by both parties and I’ll apologize publicly
No agreement = lying to the public
Cobie watching all of this, asks: “Escrow needed?”
Two of the biggest names in crypto are arguing on X over a divorce claim…
On the same day CZ launched his book.
The 2015 Binance vs OKX beef never really died
It just went quiet
Book launch day just reignited it
The last time something like this happened, we all know how it ended
the point meta is the worst thing i've ever seen in crypto
for years the formula was simple:
> you use the app because it’s useful
> you’re useful to the project by generating revenue/tvl
> the project rewards you
now, it’s just legalized liquidity slavery
projects hint at a drop just to hold your capital hostage while they pump their metrics
just look at opensea, still hasn't launched a token after 2 fcking years!!!
instead of building a product, they’re just playing with "waves" to keep the tvl from bleeding
we aren't users anymore, we’re just unpaid interns helping founders close their next vc round
and then we act surprised that normies aren’t onboarding
why would anyone join this space if you have to grind for 6 months just to get dumped on?
if a product needs points to survive, it’s already dead, stop falling for it