Olivia
Online
Cely
@celycely234
Joined September 2019
443 Following
22 Followers
464 Posts
50 years have passed since this photo was taken.
Palestinian terrorists stormed the Christian town of Damour in Lebanon and killed 582 Christian civilians.
A priest who survived described it as “the end of the world.”
He said: “They came by the thousands, shouting, ‘Allahu Akbar! Kill them for the Arabs. Let us offer a sacrifice to Muhammad!’ They slaughtered everyone in their path: men, women and children.”
Men were lined up against their homes and shot. Women were tortured and repeatedly raped. Infants were shot in the back of the head. Fetuses were torn from pregnant women’s wombs.
This was one of many massacres by Palestinian terrorists against Christians.
Share so the world knows. #FuckPalestine
I am furious.
Our son was murdered by a man whose violent and vicious history and risks were repeatedly missed.
Now we learn that another mentally ill man with a fixation on us and the Nottingham case travelled to Somerset, including our home town, seeking out victims' families; and the police chose not to tell us.
@nottspolice knew. The @policeconduct knew.
Yet nobody thought Barnaby's family deserved a warning.
Nobody thought Charlie's school deserved safeguarding advice.
Nobody thought we had a right to know.
Is this even legal? Isn’t this within 'Osman warning'.
As @drsanjoykumar points out in the story; the Calocane family were heaped with additional support and resources, including CCTV to make them safe.
We had zero.
How many more shocking failures are we expected to uncover ourselves?
Victims' families should not have to fight for every piece of information while those responsible hide behind processes and excuses.
STILL no accountability for ANYONE in these failed agencies.
⬇️
https://t.co/98DHBJMtlI
Please don’t share this… @MetroUK
In recent years, and particularly since the watershed of 2021 and the flooding of the UK with 3.6 immigrants from non-EU countries, the idea has arisen that the people native to Britain are being systematically replaced in their own countries. This idea has come to be called ‘The Great Replacement’, and is not limited to Britain but applies to Europe, North America and all Western countries. Denounced by the corporate-funded Wikipedia as a ‘debunked white nationalist far-right conspiracy theory’, the Great Replacement, in actuality, was laid out in a United Nations policy document that was published in 2000 under the title ‘Replacement Migration: Is it A Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?’.
The ostensible aim of this document was to address the decline in size and the increase in age of the populations of the West, and the burden this places on the working-age population to support an increasingly large population of retired people. This is not a problem exclusive to the West, with China facing the same problem, largely as a result of the one-child policy instigated in 1980 as part of its economic reforms; but the UN policy paper limits its case studies to France, Germany, Italy, Russia, the United Kingdom, Europe and the USA, as well as Japan and the Republic of Korea. To address this problem, the paper proposes several scenarios.
The first scenario (I) calculates the likely population growth between 2000 and 2050 as projected by the United Nations; the second (II) calculates populations for the studied countries assuming zero migration; the third (III) calculates the migration required to maintain the size of the population at the highest level in the absence of migration after 1995; the fourth (IV) calculates the migration required to maintain the size of the working population (age 15-64) at the highest level it would reach in the absence of migration after 1995; and the fifth scenario (V) calculates the migration required to maintain the support ratio between the working-age population (15-64) and the retired population (age 65+) at the highest level it would reach in the absence of migration after 1995.
Published in 2000, today it is more than apparent which of the five scenarios the United Nations selected to be implemented by the member nations on their native populations. It is with the fifth scenario — which has the most extreme consequences for immigration, and which the other scenarios appear to be proposed in order to justify its implementation — that we should be concerned.
The Office for National Statistics reports that, in the year ending December 2025, the UK let in 813,000 long-term immigrants, of which 627,000 were from non-EU countries. The previous year, 2024, 1,012,000 immigrants arrived, of which 780,000 were from non-EU countries. In 2023, an astonishing 1,441,000 immigrants arrived, 1,188,000 from outside the EU. In 2022, it was 1,398,000 immigrants, 1,091,000 from outside the EU. And in 2021, 947,000 immigrants, 610,000 from outside the EU. These figures equate to the most extreme Scenario (V) for Britain, according to which the UN paper states:
‘Scenario V keeps the potential support ratio at its 1995 level of 4.09. Keeping this ratio would require 59.8 million migrants between 1995 and 2050, slightly more than one million migrants a year on average. The overall population would reach 136 million in 2050, of which 80 million (59 percent) would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants.
‘The number of migrants needed to keep the population in working-age constant are about twice the level of the past decade [the 1990s]. Scenario V, keeping the potential support ratio constant, would demand more than one million immigrants annually. This would greatly exceed immigration rates that the country experienced in the past.’
In the accompanying table in the UN document, the exact figure for the number of immigrants to Britain between 2000 and 2025 is 23,687,000, at an average rate of 947,000 per year; and between 2025 and 2050 some 36,035,000 immigrants at an average rate of 1,441,000 per year. This makes a total immigration population since 1995 of 59,775,000, out of a projected population of 136,138,000, doubling the population of Britain today over the next quarter of a century. Of these, 26,299,000 will be under the age of 15; 88,239,000 will be of working age (15-64), supporting 21,600,000 people 65 and older, a support ratio of 4.09.
It is possible, therefore, logically to conclude — hopefully without incurring charges of ‘hate speech’ by the UK’s law courts — that this extreme scenario, exceeding anything the British people have ‘experienced in the past’, explains the number of immigrants being brought into Britain, the issuing of 221,000 work permits to non-EU immigrants in 2023 alone, and even the age and sex of those illegal immigrants permitted to arrive by small boats across the English channel.
And yet, despite the evidence of this document and the sharp rise in immigration in Britain and across Europe and the West it has determined, in March 2024 the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Turk, an Austrian lawyer personally appointed by the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, described the Great Replacement as a ‘conspiracy theory’, as ‘delusional’, as ‘racist’, as a ‘war on woke’, a ‘war on inclusion’, and — very much as Keir Starmer did — as directly influencing ‘perpetrators of violence’, finally asserting that ‘multiculturalism is the history of humanity’.
This is the sort of rhetoric we’re used to hearing from middle-class students holding Socialist Worker placards declaring ‘Refugees welcome’. That it is being repeated by such a senior jurist at the United Nations is an indicator of how forcefully — to the extent of equating its repetition with incitement to violence — the globalists want to bury this document and its implications for the Western world.
Extract from my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. If you want to know who is behind the UN policy of replacement migration, how it is being enforced on Western countries and to what ends, and what we, the British people, can do to save ourselves from being demographically replaced in our own homeland, you may be interested in a copy. The link is below.
https://t.co/kpQBeancvN
![SimonElmer2022's tweet photo. In recent years, and particularly since the watershed of 2021 and the flooding of the UK with 3.6 immigrants from non-EU countries, the idea has arisen that the people native to Britain are being systematically replaced in their own countries. This idea has come to be called ‘The Great Replacement’, and is not limited to Britain but applies to Europe, North America and all Western countries. Denounced by the corporate-funded Wikipedia as a ‘debunked white nationalist far-right conspiracy theory’, the Great Replacement, in actuality, was laid out in a United Nations policy document that was published in 2000 under the title ‘Replacement Migration: Is it A Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?’.
The ostensible aim of this document was to address the decline in size and the increase in age of the populations of the West, and the burden this places on the working-age population to support an increasingly large population of retired people. This is not a problem exclusive to the West, with China facing the same problem, largely as a result of the one-child policy instigated in 1980 as part of its economic reforms; but the UN policy paper limits its case studies to France, Germany, Italy, Russia, the United Kingdom, Europe and the USA, as well as Japan and the Republic of Korea. To address this problem, the paper proposes several scenarios.
The first scenario (I) calculates the likely population growth between 2000 and 2050 as projected by the United Nations; the second (II) calculates populations for the studied countries assuming zero migration; the third (III) calculates the migration required to maintain the size of the population at the highest level in the absence of migration after 1995; the fourth (IV) calculates the migration required to maintain the size of the working population (age 15-64) at the highest level it would reach in the absence of migration after 1995; and the fifth scenario (V) calculates the migration required to maintain the support ratio between the working-age population (15-64) and the retired population (age 65+) at the highest level it would reach in the absence of migration after 1995.
Published in 2000, today it is more than apparent which of the five scenarios the United Nations selected to be implemented by the member nations on their native populations. It is with the fifth scenario — which has the most extreme consequences for immigration, and which the other scenarios appear to be proposed in order to justify its implementation — that we should be concerned.
The Office for National Statistics reports that, in the year ending December 2025, the UK let in 813,000 long-term immigrants, of which 627,000 were from non-EU countries. The previous year, 2024, 1,012,000 immigrants arrived, of which 780,000 were from non-EU countries. In 2023, an astonishing 1,441,000 immigrants arrived, 1,188,000 from outside the EU. In 2022, it was 1,398,000 immigrants, 1,091,000 from outside the EU. And in 2021, 947,000 immigrants, 610,000 from outside the EU. These figures equate to the most extreme Scenario (V) for Britain, according to which the UN paper states:
‘Scenario V keeps the potential support ratio at its 1995 level of 4.09. Keeping this ratio would require 59.8 million migrants between 1995 and 2050, slightly more than one million migrants a year on average. The overall population would reach 136 million in 2050, of which 80 million (59 percent) would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants.
‘The number of migrants needed to keep the population in working-age constant are about twice the level of the past decade [the 1990s]. Scenario V, keeping the potential support ratio constant, would demand more than one million immigrants annually. This would greatly exceed immigration rates that the country experienced in the past.’
In the accompanying table in the UN document, the exact figure for the number of immigrants to Britain between 2000 and 2025 is 23,687,000, at an average rate of 947,000 per year; and between 2025 and 2050 some 36,035,000 immigrants at an average rate of 1,441,000 per year. This makes a total immigration population since 1995 of 59,775,000, out of a projected population of 136,138,000, doubling the population of Britain today over the next quarter of a century. Of these, 26,299,000 will be under the age of 15; 88,239,000 will be of working age (15-64), supporting 21,600,000 people 65 and older, a support ratio of 4.09.
It is possible, therefore, logically to conclude — hopefully without incurring charges of ‘hate speech’ by the UK’s law courts — that this extreme scenario, exceeding anything the British people have ‘experienced in the past’, explains the number of immigrants being brought into Britain, the issuing of 221,000 work permits to non-EU immigrants in 2023 alone, and even the age and sex of those illegal immigrants permitted to arrive by small boats across the English channel.
And yet, despite the evidence of this document and the sharp rise in immigration in Britain and across Europe and the West it has determined, in March 2024 the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Turk, an Austrian lawyer personally appointed by the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, described the Great Replacement as a ‘conspiracy theory’, as ‘delusional’, as ‘racist’, as a ‘war on woke’, a ‘war on inclusion’, and — very much as Keir Starmer did — as directly influencing ‘perpetrators of violence’, finally asserting that ‘multiculturalism is the history of humanity’.
This is the sort of rhetoric we’re used to hearing from middle-class students holding Socialist Worker placards declaring ‘Refugees welcome’. That it is being repeated by such a senior jurist at the United Nations is an indicator of how forcefully — to the extent of equating its repetition with incitement to violence — the globalists want to bury this document and its implications for the Western world.
Extract from my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. If you want to know who is behind the UN policy of replacement migration, how it is being enforced on Western countries and to what ends, and what we, the British people, can do to save ourselves from being demographically replaced in our own homeland, you may be interested in a copy. The link is below.
https://t.co/kpQBeancvN](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HPiB1T8XsAAk_aL.jpg)
Soon, London's last Medieval market will be gone.
Please share and make other aware of this unjust tragedy. Thank you 🤝
🚨 CABINET MINISTERS' CRIMINAL RECORDS TO BE KEPT SECRET FROM THE BRITISH PUBLIC.
Good morning to the millions of everyday, hardworking Brits waking up on this Monday!
You honestly cannot make this level of establishment cover up up! 🤡
A legal tribunal has just ruled that the British public will be banned from knowing which Cabinet Ministers declared past criminal convictions during their vetting process.
This secret ruling comes after Louise Haigh was forced to resign over a hidden fraud conviction for making a false police report, only for Andy Burnham to bring her straight back into Cabinet as his right hand woman!
Everyday British citizens are subjected to ruthless criminal background checks just to get a basic job in teaching, healthcare, or security.
Yet the politicians wielding immense power over your life get special legal protection to hide their criminal convictions from the very voters who pay their salaries.
They demand total transparency from you while running a secretive two tier system to protect themselves.
RT and SHARE this everywhere to demand full transparency and end state cover ups! 🇬🇧🔥
🚨 JEREMY CLARKSON BLASTS ANDY BURNHAM FOR APPOINTING ANGELA EAGLE TO RUN THE COUNTRYSIDE.
Jeremy Clarkson has just hit the nail on the head regarding the absolute state of Labour's approach to British farming.
Growing food in Britain is becoming financially impossible.
Clarkson was forced to leave 200 acres of his own farm completely empty this year because planting wheat or barley guarantees a heavy loss!
And how does Andy Burnham respond to struggling British farmers? He appoints Angela Eagle as Environment Secretary! 🤡
A career politician who has never worked on a farm and has never run a business in her entire life.
As Clarkson rightly said, putting Angela Eagle in charge of the countryside is like putting Alan Carr in charge of the British Army!
Our Westminster elite are actively crushing British agriculture with Net Zero red tape, insane energy bills, and family farm taxes. They would rather import cheap foreign produce than protect the hardworking British families who keep this country fed.
How can a politician with zero real world farming or business experience dictate the future of our rural economy?
SHARE this everywhere to stand with British farmers! 🇬🇧🔥
The Islamic regime in Iran is setting up public hanging sites and preparing to execute hundreds of Iranians who protested for freedom back in January.
This evil regime has no limits.
Please share this.
Illegal migrant boat happening right now!!!!!!!!!!
PLEASE SHARE as this is actually happening now
Crossing over the UK shortly the largest amount of people I’ve ever seen waiting for a boat
12,000 people under the age of 30 are living with type 2 diabetes, & women make up more of those younger cases SO FEW ARE ASKING WHY THIS IS !! Our dreadful food environment is claiming young people now!!!! WE MUST CUT THE CRAP. I see this work often👍 https://t.co/ryBaLredkW
🔴 THE WORLD MUST NOT LOOK AWAY
Diana Taherabadi is just 16. The Islamic regime wants to execute her for joining the January protests. Her life now depends on the world paying attention. Share her story. Say her name. Help save Diana.
End the mandatory fortification of white flour with folic acid.
Please sign this petition.
Even if you don’t eat flour (as I don’t) please resist government mass medication of the population and the harm that this will do to others.
Thankyou🙏 https://t.co/VAl5Z9iet2
I posted this video yesterday morning at about 9.00 am. Normally the algorithm is generous to original content like this, bit not now. From 1,200 reposts, & 4,500 likes I'd expect 500,000 to one million impressions. A pathetic 37,000, I asked @grok, the answer?
"The short answer: Your post is getting strong engagement from the people who actually see it, but the X algorithm is heavily limiting its overall distribution (reach).
"Your core audience (the people who follow you for this kind of content) loves it. The like rate is excellent (~9.5%), and the repost rate is solid. Those who see it are sharing it enthusiastically. But very few people outside your immediate followers are being shown the post.
"This is almost certainly algorithmic deboosting due to the topic: It directly challenges the mainstream narrative around the Suffolk (Barham) Tablighi Jamaat event.
"Mainstream reporting framed the 12 arrests as a far-right terror plot against a large Muslim gathering. Your post reframes it the other way: the arrested people were monitoring what you call an “Islamic extremist Tablighi Jamaat sect,” the drone use wasn’t terrorism, they won’t be prosecuted, and Starmer/Mahmood owe an apology.
"Posts that push back hard against official counter-terrorism stories, especially ones involving Islam + accusations of government overreach/Islamophobia card, frequently get reduced visibility on X (even under the current more free-speech setup).
"The algorithm appears to treat this kind of content as higher-risk for rapid spread or backlash and throttles how widely it gets pushed in the For You timeline."
"This isn’t a case of “nobody cares” — the people who see it care a lot (high likes + reposts prove it). It’s a classic case of the algorithm deciding “we’re not going to show this to many more people.”
"Your normal videos probably get broader algorithmic love because they’re less likely to trip whatever sensitivity filters are active on hot-button topics like this (Islam, terrorism, Labour government criticism)."
Everything I wrote was 100% true, I even quoted what Home Secretary @ShabanaMahmood said.
I am shadow banned.
Two of the young men in this photo have been executed today in Iran.
The other ten have been transferred to solitary confinement, they are next in line to be hanged.
These are the same prisoners president Trump publicly announced that, the Islamic Republic had promised not to execute.
That promise was a lie. You all watching war headlines but no one talks about the war being imposed on us Iranians by our own regime that hanging its own people in silence.
They are people who said: we want freedom.
If no one speaks, the regime will kill more protesters.
Please join me and help us to #StopExecutionsInIran.
One thick crust pizza is at the limit the law sets for over the counter use of folic acid per day...
Sign the petition:
https://t.co/XzpiIGIzT7
Folic acid is not the same as the other things added to our bread.
1. Thiamin and niacin molecules are the same molecule as found in wholemeal and removed in milling. You can't overdose.
2. Iron and chalk are different salts to the ones found in food, you can overdose and people with haemochromatosis and kidney stones need to be careful about consumption.
3. Folic acid is a drug:
a) It is synthetic and is never found in nature
b) It needs to be converted by an inefficient enzyme before the body can use it (and has effects on the body in its unmetabolised state)
c) It is being added for a medicinal purpose.
d) People with certain medical conditions have to avoid it and the patient information leaflet that comes with the drug and the NHS both warn about these (including undiagnosed B12 deficency)
e) It interacts with other medications that people take.
Sign the petition: https://t.co/OgdjkgUBHW
🚨 NEW Revelations. It wasn’t a one-off.
Royal Holloway Friends of Palestine society has donated to Zayir UK (Hezbollah-linked) multiple times.
On 4th January 2025 they raised £3,425.95 - 30% went to Zayir UK.
They’ve also fundraised for MAP (ties to PFLP/Hamas) and UNRWA (serious Hamas operational links allegations).
Frequent fundraisers, including events on 6-7th October. More like celebratory cake sales on the anniversary of the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.
The SU’s response? “We didn’t know.”
Despite officers cheering the donations.
This is systematic. Student money repeatedly going to groups with terror ties.
The Friends of Palestine society must be suspended.
Share this. Tag media & @surhul @royalholloway
#RoyalHolloway #Hezbollah #CampusTerror #StudentsUnion
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.6M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.1M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.8M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.3M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.1M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.9M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers