cerrepaco

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@ChakNorris93 @Laura01903971 ¿Has probado con Nauzet Morgade? Creo que hablar con él puede abrirte los ojos.

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@ChakNorris93 Te recomiendo que pongas las verdades oficiales en duda, como hiciste con otros temas. Te vas a sorprender. Antivacunas, chemtrailista y terraplanista no se nace, se hace a través del estudio.

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@RealAceFox1 @BGatesIsaPyscho No te conformes con una infografía. La propia nasa reconoce que usa el ciclo de saros. Si no me crees, busca esos complejos calculos geometricos que supuestamente usan, a ver si los encuentras. https://t.co/w6EmrAy3FL

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@RoundHoundOG That's not evidence; it's the principle of authority. You believe what others say without checking it. You still haven't provided a single piece of evidence for anything. You've had plenty of time. You're stupid and rude, so I'm not going to waste any more time on you.

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@juansgaviota @GabiPizarro12 @Pelacanyes_TGN Tremenda casualidad 🤔

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@RoundHoundOG https://t.co/HtF7984YsU

Dude, you're such a jerk. You said you could prove rotation, orbit, AND gravity. Obviously you can't so stop asking me for PROOFS.
Either come up with something or shut the fuck up.

[Round Hound @RoundHoundOG]

So, we can add science to the list of things you can't comprehend.
But hey... I'll give you benefit of the doubt. Show us your contract. Swearing to god aint gunna cut it.
Who ever is telling you that your credibility is being ruined, tell 'em they're full of it. Ya have to have some first.
For $10K, I'll give you rotation, orbit AND gravity.
Draw up a contract, or you're just another shit talking flerf, betting money he doesn't have.

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@_mario_boss Se explica igual que en tu modelo, la luna pasa por delante del sol. Al tener tamaños similares lo eclipsa. Resulta más raro en el modelo heliocéntrico, siendo supuestamente la luna 400 veces más pequeña que se pueda formar el "anillo".

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@RoundHoundOG Let's recap: your proof is asking the other person to take three proofs and test them on another model. Sorry, but that's not providing a proof.
By the way, I've done it with way more than three, I encourage you to give it a try.
If you decide to send something, I'll be waiting.

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@canariasdyu @FLMIRONES Os sigo, os respeto y os admiro, me encantaría si pudierais explicar el por qué no mirar el eclipse.

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@RoundHoundOG Why are you angry? You are the one claiming to have proofs

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@RoundHoundOG Dude, admit it, you have nothing.

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@RoundHoundOG @holisticnut33 Sorry, I don't understand what you say. Where is your evidence?

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@ChakNorris93 Terminarás por verlo, eres inteligente.

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@RoundHoundOG @holisticnut33 OK, you don't have the proof. There's no need to get so upset—nobody does.

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@apurioe @ecodiuku Pues ya sabes, a callar.

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@crismartinj https://t.co/dfyLdeUKGO

Otra casualidad...

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@RoundHoundOG @holisticnut33 Please, show the proofs

[cerrepaco @cerrepaco]

@javierellob0 Esto es de un diccionario de principios del siglo XX, espero que ayude a aclarar.
He visto otros "efectos Mandela", pero me temo que este no es uno de ellos.