@occupyXstreet @ComicDaveSmith@YouTube Maybe we should take the next step and round up everyone the world would be a better place without and place them in re-education camps?
@David_Khait@ComicDaveSmith@YouTube Brandenburg v. Ohio established the exemption, requiring the speech is both "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action" and is "likely to incite or produce such action."
Under your understanding speech that *criticizes* protected groups isn't covered under 1A.
@cenkuygur Cenk, you appeal to people to subscribe to support your "honest reporting". But it's impossible that, by now, you don't know that armies don't use AR-15s. So how is that "honest reporting"?
@MarktMatts@mcuban@Tim_Walz Mark appears to now be one of those people who knows the answer before he hears the question. That comes as a surprise to me.
@TeaPainUSA And don't even get me started about him not picking someone left-handed or someone really short or even someone with particularly bushy eyebrows.
Truly, the man is a monster.
@801formal_llama @metal_gear88 @AnaKasparian You kind of skipped a step there, Sparky. What is our "social conception of what a [woman]" is? If we set aside stereotypes, a woman is exactly and only what science says a woman is.
Anything other than that is linguistic legerdemain.