@InternetH0F I suspect a code. "Cassie, here is your first pair of glasses." "Cassie, second pair for you. Attention." "Here is your third task, Cassandra.". The varied wording is suspicious.
@n00buntu@adamscochran In other words, the analogous question would be "IF you beat your wife, should you go to jail?" A person who did not beat their wife could still answer "yes" without conceding the wife-beating.
@n00buntu@adamscochran No, it's really not. A "when did you stop beating your wife" question assumes a fact you dispute in the part of the question you're not being asked. By contrast, "IF it is proven..." does not.
Skimming the Jack Smith filing, seems that Ken Chesebro (CC5 here, p. 53) was openly telling people his fake elector plan was a gambit to let Congressmen make false claims disputing the election. He seems to be clearly aware the votes were illegal. Not a good look. 1/
@PhilAndersUAE@JasonKPargin Maybe largest at the end, but if the model doesn't start the bump at the beginning it's assuming no effect during the convention, which seems a very odd assumption. The shape of a "bump" would still show the last night with a greater effect than the first.
@PhilAndersUAE@JasonKPargin I didn't specify whether I was measuring from the beginning or end of the convention. That said, shouldn't the bump measure from the beginning? I.e., wouldn't a campaign get a boost during their convention?
@LuckyDogHotSaus @GeorgePapa19 The economy, abortion rights, immigration, conflict zones... there was simply no way to know these kinds of topics would come up in a presidential debate in advance.