Cameron Fredman

Lawyer, political junkie, musician, dog-lover, and reluctant optimist.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

When your only tool is a laser pointer, every problem looks like a bored kitten.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

Extended version of the hypnosis scene in The Penguin finale. #ThePenguin #ThePenguinFinale

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

I used to think too much about apostrophes. I still do, but I used to, too.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@FVLAM

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@InternetH0F I suspect a code. "Cassie, here is your first pair of glasses." "Cassie, second pair for you. Attention." "Here is your third task, Cassandra.". The varied wording is suspicious.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@SJohnsdottire In a year the debt collectors will have no way to get at you, now that there are windows and doors blocking the openings.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@ProfRobAnderson Could be a load-bearing sticker.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@shotpianist @PersistentOne3 @rickhasen @hugolowell My bad! :)

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@shotpianist @PersistentOne3 @rickhasen @hugolowell The USC in 52 USC 10307(c) stands for United States Code, i.e., federal law.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@lewbryson @BadLegalTakes Same. I thought, "is he quoting from the dissent or something?" before finding the third image.

[The Figen @TheFigen_]

In case you've never heard the howl of an arctic wolf, here it is, it's worth it. 😂

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@n00buntu @adamscochran In other words, the analogous question would be "IF you beat your wife, should you go to jail?" A person who did not beat their wife could still answer "yes" without conceding the wife-beating.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@n00buntu @adamscochran No, it's really not. A "when did you stop beating your wife" question assumes a fact you dispute in the part of the question you're not being asked. By contrast, "IF it is proven..." does not.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

"No harm in it, legally at least" written by a lawyer in reference to *checks notes* staging a coup. https://t.co/MQN0fXdYhW

[capitolhunters @capitolhunters]

Skimming the Jack Smith filing, seems that Ken Chesebro (CC5 here, p. 53) was openly telling people his fake elector plan was a gambit to let Congressmen make false claims disputing the election. He seems to be clearly aware the votes were illegal. Not a good look. 1/

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@OrinKerr Had a crim law prof who famously started every class by yelling out the door, "Last call for a good time!"

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@PhilAndersUAE @JasonKPargin Maybe largest at the end, but if the model doesn't start the bump at the beginning it's assuming no effect during the convention, which seems a very odd assumption. The shape of a "bump" would still show the last night with a greater effect than the first.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@PhilAndersUAE @JasonKPargin I didn't specify whether I was measuring from the beginning or end of the convention. That said, shouldn't the bump measure from the beginning? I.e., wouldn't a campaign get a boost during their convention?

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@PhilAndersUAE @JasonKPargin That is not a plausible explanation a full month after the convention.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@LuckyDogHotSaus @GeorgePapa19 The economy, abortion rights, immigration, conflict zones... there was simply no way to know these kinds of topics would come up in a presidential debate in advance.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@SCOTUSPlaces Dude. That crossed a line.

[Cameron Fredman @cfredman]

@LuckyDogHotSaus @TheRickWilson https://t.co/38fnK0VzZX