@raizada55 the player made an illegal move (his king is in check and he moved the rook). happens to anyone esp when in time trouble. even happens to grandmasters. 2 illegal moves in a game is a loss. 1 illegal then ur opponent gets 2 extra minutes. its a regular occurrence. not cheating.
Now they're even using chess for their racist propoganda. See how they distort facts to suit their narrative. And of course, as long as you're being racist, it will definitely get insane reach even if you are a small account. Look at how disgusting the comments and QTs are.
To make things clear, that's not cheating, it's an illegal move. The IM just didn't see the check in time trouble, he got penalized for it, fairly ordinary in chess.
Btw, that's a Canadian born IM, not even an indian national, but it doesn't matter of course as long as he's brown, poor fella is getting so much hate for absolutely no reason. It's disgusting.
हिंदुत्व और प्रचंड राष्ट्रवाद के नाम पर वोट देने वाले सामान्य वर्ग को - मिला एससी एसटी एक्ट में फ़र्ज़ी केस
जिन्हें सब कुछ दिया वो माँ बहन की गालियाँ दे रहे है और तख्तापलट की तैयारी करती 🪳 की भीड़ है।
जो अपनों का सम्मान नहीं करता उस का यही होता है।
#ReformScStAct#UgcRollBack
Please, do not stay silent for Anojan
Pray for him, stand with him, and help his story be heard
Raise your voice for Anojan Sivarasa
#SaveAnojanSivarasa#SaveAnojan
H'ble @nsitharaman , Below, you state that you haven't increased any taxes on the Equity, claiming the only hike was the STT on F&O
What about rise in LTCG & STCG?
Ma'am,
Before October 2004
Long-term gains on listed shares were taxed at 20% with indexation, or 10% without — whichever worked out lower. Short-term gains had no special treatment at all. They were simply added to your income and taxed at your slab, which meant 30% for anyone in the top bracket. There was no STT.
October 2004:
The Finance (No.2) Act 2004 made a trade. LTCG on listed equity went to zero under Section 10(38). STCG got a flat concessional rate of 10% under Section 111A. In exchange, a new levy was introduced — STT, collected at source on every trade, at 0.075% on both the buy and the sell of a delivery transaction.
The logic was elegant: instead of chasing capital gains through assessment, collect a small amount from everyone, automatically, at the exchange. Compliance went up, litigation went down.
2005: Delivery STT raised to 0.10%
2006: Raised again to 0.125%
2008: STCG raised from 10% to 15%
2012: Delivery STT cut back to 0.10% — where it still sits today
This is cruelty,
**2018: LTCG exemption withdrawn. Section 112A brings back 10% on gains above ₹1 lakh, with gains up to 31 January 2018 grandfathered**
**2024: LTCG raised to 12.5% above ₹1.25 lakh. STCG raised to 20%**
2026: Budget raises STT on futures and options only. Delivery untouched
Very Good.
LTCG was in lieu of STT. Why you retained & increasing both?
Please make LTCG 0 & STCG 10%. Please.🙏🙏
Anojan called us himself and said he had injuries in six places on his head," Mr. Rajeevkanth said Wednesday. "He was crying as he told us that he had been attacked with a sharp weapon."
In Parliament, Mr. Rasamanickam said the family had been told that Mr. Anojan was struck on the head with a knife and that his life had been in danger. According to the family, he said, Mr. Anojan had been moved from the prison where he was previously held to another prison, where he was attacked by a prisoner in the section for inmates under sentence of death.
Sivarasa Anojan, the Sri Lankan migrant worker facing execution in Saudi Arabia, told his family that he had been attacked with a sharp weapon in prison, according to a civil society activist working closely with his relatives. Sri Lanka's government, relying on information from Saudi prison authorities, told Parliament on Wednesday that his injuries had been caused by another inmate's fingernails.
https://t.co/XozaRFllM1
“Give us death if you can’t deliver justice,” says Amit Chaudhary, whose family is facing 14 cases under the SC/ST Act.
He had to face jail at the age of 14 because of this. Now, he faces 42 court hearings a month.
Full video: https://t.co/Gfw7MQgPfq
Anojan is facing execution in Saudi Arabia over a FB comment, over a video of a Muslim man kicking a dog following Hindu pilgrims in Sri Lanka. After a Muslim insulted a Hindu deity online, Anojan responded by insulting Prophet Muhammad. For that, he's been sentenced to death. Barbaric society.
देश की वैज्ञानिक क्षमता को बर्बाद करने के लिए 2022 में मोदी ने साइंटिफिक और तकनीकी क्षेत्रों में आरक्षण की व्यवस्था बनाई। किसी से पूछा नहीं, चुपके से लागू किया जैसा कि इस समाजविभाजक प्रधानमंत्री ने अपने भीम प्रेम में पहले भी किया है।
यह व्यक्ति यही कार्य प्राइवेट क्षेत्रों में भी आरक्षण के लिए 2028 के बजट सत्र में या उससे पूर्व ग्रुप डी से आरंभ करेगा। जबकि सत्य यह है कि जिसके लिए यह इतना झुक रहा है, वो इसे कहीं नहीं वोट करते।
@narendramodi इसी कारण 2047 का लक्ष्य रखा है कि तब किसको याद रहेगा?
Saudi Arabia is going to kill a man over a Facebook post they deem blasphemous.
One Facebook post, and a life is taken.
This is criminal and abhorrent.
🚨 BREAKING FAKE SC/ST ACT STING OPERATION BY DAINIK BHASKAR!
Wives file cases, husbands become witnesses, agents broker the deal!
The sting alleges a Bihar racket involving fake SC/ST cases and a ₹2.5 lakh package.😳
Watch the sting.
A dog used to follow pilgrims to a Hindu religious site in Sri Lanka, and videos of it were shared warmly in Sri Lankan Hindu circles.
In late June, offended by the videos, a Muslim man went to the pilgrimage site, located the dog, kicked it, and uploaded the video, sparking outrage. During one such argument, a Sri Lankan Muslim wrote a derogatory post against the Hindu deity.
Anojan Sivarasa, a Sri Lankan Hindu working as a laborer in Saudi Arabia, didn't like the comment and responded with a reply that was allegedly derogatory to the Prophet.
Anojan's well-wisher immediately warned him. He took down the comment and issued a video apology within five minutes in which he said he was responding to an insult to his faith. However, it was too late. Anojan's fellow Sri Lankan Muslims had already taken a screenshot and emailed it to his employer in Saudi Arabia. His employer promptly reported it to the authorities, who arrested Anojan and put him on trial. He has been sentenced to death.
Saudi Arabia rarely reverses a decision once it has made one, but there should be global outrage over this. Blasphemy laws or whatever, the man was only responding to an insult to his faith, deleted the comment, and issued an apology within minutes, yet he will still have to pay with his life while those who provoked him are rejoicing in Sri Lanka. This is unacceptable. Anyone calling themselves a free speech supporter and not opposing this is a hypocrite of the highest order.
BJP MLA Satyendra Nath Tiwari from Garhwa, Jharkhand, booked under the SC/ST Act.
An FIR has been filed against him by a supporter of Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren. Now they’re getting a taste of their own medicine.
One family filed 21 cases under the SC/ST Act, 14 against a single family, forcing them to face 42 court hearings every month.
Villagers told us that the ‘oppressed’ family received ₹46 lakh in compensation. People now fear speaking about it openly.
But off camera, everyone tells the same story about a ‘business model’ built around SC/ST cases.
How a law meant to prevent atrocities became a tool for profit. Watch @Keshavmalan93’s special investigation to find out.