@PUNTERIQ There is something completely incongruent about bookies advertising winning but restricting winners.
It's such a pity that the regulating bodies and media are 'in bed' with these bodies.
@TRGMikeWood@foxcatcherintel@Nic_Ashman That results in an 83c deduction on the $3 chance & a dividend of $0.51 or 49% loss which is wrong
What should happen is the 1st 33c deduction is halved to 16c after the 2nd scratching, & the total deductions move to 66c, which equals a $1 dividend / 100% refund which is correct
@foxcatcherintel High market percentages and small limits are destined to continue, when you have scenario's like Sheza Alibi suddenly deciding to run in a Doncaster.
It's really a product that has average punters competing against stable insiders and jockey managers.
@TheStraightonX@rowe_tim Lambasted by Austrac, lambasted by shareholders and lambasted by punters regarding this issue.
You almost have to feel sorry for TAB