Unpopular opinion: grok bot is a solution in search of a problem - no different to openclaw. I’ve been a cursor customer for many years and absolutely love everything they do, but i see zero reason to use it when I already have multiple harnesses and tools for coding and/or “work”.
Unpopular opinion: grok bot is a nothing burger. I get that it’s allegedly 100xed cursor employees’ lives, but we’re back to the same silly usecases with bookings etc. all of this is already achievable with cowork on Claude or ChatGPT. I get it runs on vms 24/7, but it feels awfully similar to openclaw - a solution in search of a problem
Few concerns:
- if I feed it a legal doc or a piece of work I need reviewing, is it going to treat it any differently?
- if I write code with it, is the output going to be worse because of the extra steps it has to make to watermark the work?
- is all the work I am getting it to do on my behalf, now the property of Anthropic?
Your nonchalant responses to some of the replies is worrying. You’re right, it’s ultimately a decision that we use their product and abide by it, but they sold me a tool which is meant to be an assistant. I didn’t agree to this. I just want it to do what I ask it to do without any fluff in between. This imo has nothing to do with eu laws and everything to do with anthropic detecting distillation.
Their approach is starting to lose me
@morganlinton Not so fast… I think gh will survive origin is. I’m really excited to see what it’s about, but fairly certain nothing short of a miracle will get me and my team off gh
@leanderriefel 3k engineers for Spotify is wild even if there’s more surface area we don’t see/associate with on the Spotify clients like podcasts, ads, etc