GLUTEN ALLERGIES and skyrocketing celiac disease didn't "just happen." They EXPLODED starting in 2006.
That exact year marks the red line. Farmers began spraying GLYPHOSATE (Roundup) directly onto wheat crops as a DESICCANT right before harvest.
Sprayed on standing wheat to dry it out faster for easier combining. The chemical stays in the grain — the same grain turned into your bread, pasta, cereal, and baked goods.
Before 2006: gluten issues were rare.
After 2006: sudden, massive surge in celiac disease, wheat sensitivities, and gut destruction across the population.
This isn't coincidence. Glyphosate disrupts the gut microbiome — killing beneficial bacteria that help digest gluten and maintain intestinal integrity. It turns a once-harmless staple into a trigger for inflammation, leaky gut, autoimmune chaos, and lifelong sensitivities for millions.
Your "gluten problem" may actually be GLYPHOSATE RESIDUE poisoning your food supply. Daily exposure through conventional wheat products.
This is chemical contamination of the American food chain — hidden in plain sight on supermarket shelves.
Protect yourself:
- Switch to certified organic wheat products (no pre-harvest desiccant spraying)
- Choose imported European wheat/pasta when possible (stricter rules)
- Read labels and demand transparency
Our health crisis has a timeline. 2006 changed everything.
Share this if you've watched loved ones suffer mysterious gut issues after "normal" bread. The truth is in the timeline.
You literally just signed SB 73 before the LA mayoral election. This law prohibits unauthorized access, disruption, modification, or seizure of voter rolls, voter lists, or certified voting technology by law enforcement (including federal agents) without a court order or specific state election law investigation.
You are actively making laws to make it HARDER for there to be election integrity.
Time to take down the California Communist Party
A man spends 50 years teaching at MIT.
He knows his time is running out.
So he records one last lecture — everything he knows, distilled into a single hour.
He died 5 months later.
This is that lecture.
The most important hour you'll watch this week. 👇
Bookmark it for later
There are 46 vagrant fires every single day in LA…rubbish and encampment fires that destroy property, vehicles, kill pets, spread to vegetation, and compromise infrastructure. That’s 17,000+ fires per year. Until you clear vagrants from the streets, don’t pretend you’re serious about mitigating fire threats.
California gave ONE nonprofit $1 BILLION.
To put solar panels on poor people's roofs.
You know how much solar they actually installed?
$72 million.
That's it.
So where the FUCK is the other $928 MILLION?
I'll tell you exactly where.
The same nonprofit that WROTE the law that gave them the money ALSO got the contract to run "community outreach."
Same guy runs the nonprofit AND the program. Chris Walker. Two paychecks. Look it up.
And their SISTER organization — same building, same staff, same donors — is a 501(c)(4) that endorses Democrat candidates and runs door-knocking operations in the EXACT SAME NEIGHBORHOODS.
Connect the dots, idiot.
You pay $7.50 a gallon for gas.
Cap-and-trade takes a cut at the pump.
That money flows to "climate justice nonprofits."
Those nonprofits funnel it into Democrat get-out-the-vote machines.
You. Are. Funding. The. People. Who. Are. Robbing. You.
Every time you fill up your fucking tank, you're paying for a Democrat campaign volunteer to knock on a stranger's door and tell them how amazing Gavin Newsom is.
$928 MILLION.
GONE.
And not one journalist in this state asked a single question until @jennyraeca and CAL DOGE pulled the receipts.
You think this is the only one?
There's a hundred more like it.
This is how California works now.
This is how a "blue state" stays blue when only 48% of the voters are Democrats.
Wake the fuck up.
@patrickbetdavid@VincentOshana@FoxNews@WallStreetApes @CalDOGEgov @elonmusk@libsoftiktok
We're standing in front of the building right now.
https://t.co/bYQD11T69M
🔥 WOW - This one may be the BEST ONE YET! A NEW Campaign Ad was just released for Spencer Pratt running for Mayor to SAVE Los Angeles!
Hopefully Los Angeles has WOKEN UP and can see that Socialist policies FAIL EVERY TIME. Don't make the same mistake NYC did with Mamdani! I don't think LA can afford ANY more mistakes!
Go @spencerpratt to SAVE LA!
This Campaign Add was created by Menace Studio, an AI Film studio.
Video posted by @charliebcurran on X.
@CAgovernor Newsom is demented. It took a 23-year-old journalist to uncover California's fraud. Nice try to make it sound like you and Bonta actually did something. You guys are a disgrace to the citizens of the great state of California. Take your BS somewhere else. We see right through you
This is precisely why we fucking ADORE President Trump.
The man is the undisputed GOAT...unapologetic, untouchable, and armed with a lethal sense of humor that cuts straight through the bullshit.
Some White House staffer drops a post, the woke outrage machine spins up because someone dared compare the Obamas to apes, and suddenly the “apes are upset.”
Trump doesn’t grovel.
He doesn’t issue some mealy-mouthed apology for something he didn’t even say or intend.
Instead, he steps in, owns the moment, and turns it into absolute comedic gold.
That’s not just funny.
That’s a masterclass in refusing to kneel to the perpetually offended mob while reminding everyone who’s actually in charge.
He sees the attempted trap, laughs in its face, and flips it into a rallying cry that exposes the absurdity of the critics.
Zero remorse, maximum dominance.
Pure, unfiltered Trump.
This is why we ride for him.
He fights like we fight: no retreat, no surrender, no fake contrition. Just raw, ferocious truth delivered with a grin.
We don’t want sanitized politicians.
We want the one who makes the left seethe and the rest of us cheer.
The snowflakes can cope and seeth.
🖤💀🖤
(for the stupid snowflakes... This is satire. Jesus fucking Christ get some goddamn humor)
The “So What” or “Why Calling It an Insurgency Actually Matters.”
In the first post I laid out the uncomfortable parallels: the Minneapolis Signal networks are not random protest coordination. They show structure, redundancy, OPSEC awareness, SALUTE-style reporting, dispatch roles, mobile intercepts, shared databases, and escalation protocols. This mirrors the early urban cells we tracked and eventually dismantled in Anbar and Helmand. The infrastructure exists. The cadre is adapting quickly. The violence has already turned lethal. The real question is not whether this qualifies as an insurgency. The real question is what changes when we finally name it one. Here is why the label matters and why refusing to use it (exactly as happened in 2003-2006 Iraq) hands the advantage to the other side.
1) Unity of Effort: From Siloed Bubbles to Cohesive Campaign
Right now, federal agencies operate in separate lanes. ICE and CBP concentrate on deportations and fugitive operations. Local police departments focus on public order. DOJ prosecutes through standard channels. Intelligence elements collect what they can without crossing domestic lines. Each group optimizes for its own narrow mission while the networked opposition exploits every seam between them.
We saw the same pattern in early Iraq. Units stayed inside their FOB bubbles with different chains of command, different rules of engagement, different priorities. Army elements hunted IED facilitators, Marines cleared Fallujah, intelligence agencies chased high-value targets, and civilian agencies worked reconstruction in isolation. Insurgents moved freely through the gaps and regenerated after every tactical defeat.
Once we acknowledged the insurgency (roughly 2006-2007 with the Surge and FM 3-24), the picture changed. We built unity of effort: joint task forces, fused intelligence cells, combined operations centers, and a shared understanding that this was no longer a collection of law enforcement actions plus military side projects. It became a synchronized campaign with security, governance, information, and economic lines of operation working together. Chains of command aligned. Resources flowed toward the decisive effort. Agencies that once competed now reinforced one another.
Apply the same logic here. Calling it an insurgency creates the doctrinal and legal foundation to stand up interagency fusion cells (DHS, DOJ, FBI, plus vetted local liaison where realistic), dedicate HUMINT and SIGINT assets against the actual networks instead of just street-level obstructors, and task-organize beyond agency silos. ICE and CBP by themselves cannot dismantle a distributed 1,000-member-per-zone command-and-control apparatus backed by local enablers. They need the full architecture of a counterinsurgency campaign where every element pulls in the same direction.
2) Authorities, Funding, and Task Organization Finally Align
Without the insurgency label you remain locked in Title 8 / Title 18 law-enforcement mode: warrants, probable cause, case-by-case prosecutions. Insurgents thrive in that environment. They stay below the threshold, absorb the arrest of foot soldiers, and regenerate. Prosecutions get dropped or delayed when local prosecutors and judges are sympathetic or compromised. We watched exactly that cycle in Iraq: insurgents detained locally, released by captured courts, back on the street within days.
Recognizing an insurgency opens different tools: broader surveillance authorities (FISA, Title III with national-security nexus), dedicated funding lines instead of scraping from existing agency budgets, special courts, or procedures if necessary to bypass local capture, and task-organized units that blend federal, state, and (where feasible) vetted local personnel.
In Anbar we eventually had to bypass corrupt local structures and route detainees through Baghdad’s special courts to prevent immediate release. The long delay in calling it an insurgency meant we paid in blood for years before those mechanisms existed. The same dynamic applies here. ICE and CBP are outmatched against embedded networks that enjoy local government cover. A counterinsurgency posture lets you build the structure to target the leadership and support apparatus, not merely the visible chasers.
3) The Historical Lesson: Delay Equals Enemy Consolidation
Iraq 2003-2006 is the warning we cannot ignore. Ground commanders (Special Forces, intelligence, line units) flagged an emerging insurgency by mid-2003. Senior political leadership banned the word and insisted it was only “dead-enders,” “criminals,” or “foreign fighters.” Narrative control overrode reality. The result was three years of escalation, multiple deaths, hardened enemy structures, and eroded popular support. By the time we admitted the truth and surged (Petraeus, Odierno, FM 3-24), the enemy was far stronger, sectarian civil war had erupted, and recovery cost far more in lives and treasure.
We cannot afford that timeline on our own soil. These networks are already hardening. They learn from every disrupted ICE raid, refine their OPSEC, expand recruitment, and spread to other cities. Every day we pretend this remains “activism” or “civil disobedience,” they train, grow, and strengthen narrative dominance (“community defense” versus “federal overreach”). This is not about seeking escalation. It is about facing reality so the correct tools can be applied before the movement enters a more dangerous phase. History teaches one clear lesson: name the threat accurately, align the national effort, resource it properly, or watch it metastasize.
As a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops—both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations—I’ve seen organized resistance up close. From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.
What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t “protest.” It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook.
Signal groups at 1,000-member cap per zone. Dedicated roles: mobile chasers, plate checkers logging vehicle data into shared databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes vectoring assets, SALUTE-style reporting (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations and timed deletions to frustrate forensic recovery. Vetting processes for new joiners. Mutual aid from sympathetic locals (teachers providing cover, possible PD tip-offs on license plate lookups). Home-base coordination points. Rapid escalation from observation to physical obstruction—or worse.
This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a SF team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace “ICE agents” with “occupying coalition forces” and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s.
The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in. When your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid-response network against federal officers—complete with doxxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that’s already turned lethal—you’re no longer dealing with civil disobedience. You’re facing a distributed resistance that’s learned the lessons of successful insurgencies: stay below the kinetic threshold most of the time, force over-reaction when possible, maintain popular support through narrative, and never present a single center of gravity.
I spent years training partner forces to dismantle exactly this kind of apparatus. Now pieces of it are standing up in American cities, enabled by elements of local government and civil society. That should keep every thinking American awake at night.
Not because I want escalation. But because history shows these things don’t de-escalate on their own once the infrastructure exists and the cadre believe they’re winning the information war.
We either recognize what we’re actually looking at—or we pretend it’s still just “activism” until the structures harden and spread.
Your call, America. But from where I sit, this isn’t January 2026 politics anymore.
It’s phase one of something we’ve spent decades trying to keep off our own soil.